[tz] Proposal: Sections for different kinds of backward links
Paul Eggert
eggert at cs.ucla.edu
Sun Nov 14 21:17:42 UTC 2021
On 11/14/21 04:16, Stephen Colebourne via tz wrote:
> The distinction between `obsolescent` and `other` seems unnecessary -
> they are all IDs no longer suitable for use.
We could merge the two into a single category 'obsolescent'.
> I need to be able to indicate which spelling users
> should use.
That info is already in zone.tab's column 3. Although that file is
marked "deprecated", perhaps we can undeprecate it.
More information about the tz
mailing list