[tz] Issues with pre-1970 information in TZDB
eggert at cs.ucla.edu
Thu Sep 23 16:58:31 UTC 2021
On 9/22/21 12:34 PM, Tom Lane via tz wrote:
> 1. It's not possible to separate the new backzone zones from the old.
No, actually it is possible. I've done it, by using the patch I
That patch does exactly the separation you describe. It separates the
new backzone Zones from the old ones. When using it, I obtained
tzdata.zi and TZif files that exactly matched 2021a except for the
changes you're not objecting to. I verified the match by zdumping the
resulting TZif files and comparing the outputs. This all took quite a
bit of work, but it was work I was willing to undertake to avoid the (to
mind worse) alternative of forking tzdb.
> 2. This approach puts it on individual tzdb distributors to decide
> which of these two options to choose.
Yes, that problem is inherent to any fork or option-equivalent-to-fork.
That's one reason I recommended against using the patch. Another reason
- more important to my mind - is that sticking with 2021a's blueprint
would mean that its equity problems would remain present in whoever uses
More information about the tz