[tz] make traditional_tarballs fails on macOS for 2022b
Paul Eggert
eggert at cs.ucla.edu
Fri Aug 12 01:28:17 UTC 2022
On 8/11/22 16:40, Deborah Goldsmith wrote:
> Is it possible you built with something other than onetrueawk?
I looked into that, and it turns out I made a different mistake: on
FreeBSD 13 I accidentally tested with 2020b not 2022b. So you're right,
2022b's make_traditional_tarballs also fails on FreeBSD 13. Sorry about
that mistake.
> We don’t modify the source. We do make the rearguard tarballs, which suffer from the same awk problem, and which can’t be downloaded.
Oh, I thought you were running "make traditional_tarballs" (the subject
line of this thread). If you're running "make rearguard_tarballs" I
think I now see why it's needed.
One worry is that if we release a new version 2022c right away with the
installed patch, we'll run into some other issue on macOS that would
mean we'd need to release 2022d, 2022e, etc. To prevent that, can you
please try running the rest of your build procedure with the rearguard
tarball? If that works, we can release 2022c with more confidence.
To help you try that out, I built the rearguard tarball and you can pick
it up here temporarily:
https://www.cs.ucla.edu/~eggert/tz/tzdata2022b-rearguard.tar.gz
Here's the output of 'sha512sum' on it:
e9470bdf35349080143c5c36bd6460d45ad506b2b3bd6ce192df1cae1739a945dbf4d4b128ae0f8026e4187dcd2e25a0b3cb2a74be820406f99e4a895d31e3ed
tzdata2022b-rearguard.tar.gz
and you can find the GPG signed checksum here:
https://www.cs.ucla.edu/~eggert/tz/tzdata2022b-rearguard.tar.gz.asc
More information about the tz
mailing list