[tz] Tzdb and the Sunshine Protection Act

[Eliot Lear]

On 04.03.23 22:12, Pete Resnick wrote:
>>
>
> To be perfectly clear, even though the syntax was called "obsolete" in 
> 2822 and 5322, we are clarifying in the full Standard (being completed 
> soon) that it would probably have been better to call it "legacy": The 
> elements in that section are not going away in any meaningful way, but 
> rather they exist in archives of email and are generated by legacy 
> systems from time to time, as Steffen rightly (though perhaps 
> indelicately) points out. 


Right.  The point I'm making is that there is really nothing to do on 
the standards front in this case.  We all know that email lives forever.

Eliot

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/tz/attachments/20230305/47e3c792/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OpenPGP_signature
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 495 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/tz/attachments/20230305/47e3c792/attachment.sig>