[tz] Lebanon DST change internally disputed

Jad Baz jadbaz at gmail.com
Mon Mar 27 09:59:53 UTC 2023


I think that's a bit older
This article says otherwise
That the cabinet is actually meeting right now

https://www.aljadeed.tv/arabic/news/local/270320237

On Mon, Mar 27, 2023, 12:55 Rany Hany via tz <tz at iana.org> wrote:

> Issue of timezones postponed until next Thursday:
>
> https://www.lbcgroup.tv/news/lebanon/694101/%D9%88%D8%B2%D9%8A%D8%B1-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AB%D9%82%D8%A7%D9%81%D8%A9-%D9%85%D9%8A%D9%82%D8%A7%D8%AA%D9%8A-%D9%82%D8%AF-%D9%8A%D8%AF%D8%B9%D9%88-%D8%A5%D9%84%D9%89-%D8%AC%D9%84%D8%B3%D8%A9-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AE%D9%85%D9%8A%D8%B3-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D9%82%D8%A8%D9%84/ar
>
>
> On 2023-03-27 11:22, Jad Baz via tz wrote:
> > Lebanon's PM likely to reverse decision and stick to regular summer
> > time
> >
> > Kindly hold off on 2023b until this is resolved
> >
> > https://twitter.com/ALJADEEDNEWS/status/1640262642206998528
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 27, 2023, 01:57 Arthur David Olson
> > <arthurdavidolson at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> A mess indeed.
> >>
> >> If there is a decision reversal tomorrow that's effective tomorrow,
> >> there'll be a database decision on whether to record the
> >> less-than-week-long clock change.-S
> >>
> >> --ado
> >>
> >> On Sun, Mar 26, 2023 at 6:15 PM Paul Eggert via tz <tz at iana.org>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 2023-03-26 14:56, Jad Baz via tz wrote:
> >>>> Prime Minister Mikati calls for a cabinet session tomorrow
> >>> (Monday) noon
> >>>> and the issue of timing is the single item on the agenda
> >>>
> >>> Noon standard time, or noon daylight saving time? :-)
> >>>
> >>> Anyway, thank you for the heads-up. In the light of today's and
> >>> (likely)
> >>> tomorrow's developments I suggest that downstream distributors
> >>> stick
> >>> with tzdb 2023a for now. The only change in 2023b is this recent
> >>> controversial Lebanon adjustment, and if (as seems quite possible)
> >>> the
> >>> Lebanese government changes its rules again, we'll need a tzdb
> >>> 2023c
> >>> shortly, which will quite possibly be identical to 2023a except
> >>> for
> >>> commentary.
> >>>
> >>> In short: stick with 2023a for now, and tomorrow let's see.
> >>>
> >>> What a mess, huh?
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/tz/attachments/20230327/a2b4dd7e/attachment.htm>


More information about the tz mailing list