[tz] strftime %s

[Paul Gilmartin]

On 1/12/24 16:17:07, Paul Eggert via tz wrote:
> On 2024-01-12 11:47, Steve Summit via tz wrote:
>  .
>> I hope that, in the absence of either of these admittedly radical
>> proposals, Posix is at least mandating tm_gmtoff, which we've
>> long needed anyway, and which would at least make the implicit
>> mktime call, necessitated by %s, a tractable problem.)
> 
> Yes, that's what draft POSIX is doing. 
> .
Is that draft publicly available?

But it may make things worse with a 3-way inconsistency:
o TZ at time of localtime()
o TZ at time of strftime()
o tm_gmtoff
o other fields in struct tm.
... any of which I can set from my wristwatch in struct tm.

-- 
gil