<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:"Segoe UI Emoji";
panose-1:2 11 5 2 4 2 4 2 2 3;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0cm;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle18
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
margin:72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body link="blue" vlink="purple" style="word-wrap:break-word">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB" style="mso-fareast-language:EN-US">There hasn’t been any info on the below in the last 10 days, is anything happening in the background which the list is not privy to? Or are we in a stalemate between the TZ coordinator
and the opponents of this change?<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="mso-fareast-language:EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span lang="EN-US">From:</span></b><span lang="EN-US"> tz <tz-bounces@iana.org>
<b>On Behalf Of </b>Deborah Goldsmith via tz<br>
<b>Sent:</b> 18 June 2021 00:09<br>
<b>To:</b> Mark Davis <mark@macchiato.com><br>
<b>Cc:</b> Time Zone Mailing List <tz@iana.org><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [tz] Undoing the effect of the new alike-since-1970 patch<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Agreed<o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Debbie<o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><br>
<br>
<o:p></o:p></p>
<blockquote style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On Jun 16, 2021, at 7:08 AM, Mark Davis <span style="font-family:"Segoe UI Emoji",sans-serif">
☕️</span> via tz <<a href="mailto:tz@iana.org">tz@iana.org</a>> wrote:<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt">Agreed<o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Mark (<span style="font-family:"Segoe UI Emoji",sans-serif">📱</span>)<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On Wed, Jun 16, 2021, 01:30 Jürgen Appel via tz <<a href="mailto:tz@iana.org">tz@iana.org</a>> wrote:<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<blockquote style="border:none;border-left:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0cm">
<p class="MsoNormal">Dear <a href="mailto:tz@iana.org" target="_blank">tz@iana.org</a>,<br>
<br>
On Tuesday, 15 June 2021 19:00:37 CEST Alois Treindl via tz wrote:<br>
<br>
agreed (3)<br>
<br>
> agreed (2)<br>
> <br>
> On 15.06.21 17:12, David Patte via tz wrote:<br>
> > agreed<br>
<br>
[...]<br>
<br>
> >> We seem to be at an impasse.<br>
> >> <br>
> >> I don't think there is any support from the mailing list for the<br>
> >> merging patch to remain in the repo. You've had many requests to<br>
> >> revert it, and no requests to retain it.<br>
> >> <br>
> >> There are technical solutions available to reduce the amount of data<br>
> >> published to downstream users, but the starting point must be a fully<br>
> >> populated database, not one that is logically broken. The next action<br>
> >> must be to revert. Then we can agree on any technical measures<br>
> >> necessary.<br>
> >> <br>
> >> Stephen<br>
<br>
Cheers,<br>
Jürgen<br>
<br>
<br>
-- <br>
Jürgen Appel<br>
Research Scientist<br>
Denmark's National Metrology Institute<br>
Dansk Fundamental Metrologi, DFM A/S (<a href="http://dfm.dk/" target="_blank">dfm.dk</a>)<br>
Kogle Allé 5<br>
DK-2970 Hørsholm<br>
Denmark<br>
<br>
Mobile: +45 25459049<br>
Email: <a href="mailto:jap@dfm.dk" target="_blank">jap@dfm.dk</a><br>
VAT: DK-29217939<o:p></o:p></p>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>