[UA-comms] Following up on the BRG

[Kuan Ting]

Well mentioned Lars, I can reminisce that to my best of the acquaintance I
never see such concern of lack of knowledge with Brand Registry Group about
UA and the UASG.

It appendage my point that current Individuals are just eyeing vested
interest in such opportunities of being travelling funded and not conveying
plentiful what is essential.

Kuan Ting

On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 12:50 PM Lars Steffen <lars.steffen at eco.de> wrote:

> Don and I have been in touch with the Brand Registry Group before and I
> shared events with Martin Sutton where I gave presentations about UA. They
> know about UA and the UASG.
>
> If the Brand Registry Group is having the impression that the UASG is
> focussing on IDNs, I can´t blame them. The balance between IDNs and new
> gTLDs in UASG´s strategy and comms has been discussed several times in the
> past.
>
> All the best,
>
> Lars
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *Von:* UA-comms <ua-comms-bounces at icann.org> *Im Auftrag von *Kuan Ting
> *Gesendet:* Mittwoch, 11. März 2020 06:15
> *An:* Mark W. Datysgeld <mark at governanceprimer.com>
> *Cc:* ua-comms at icann.org
> *Betreff:* Re: [UA-comms] Following up on the BRG
>
>
>
> Mark
>
>
>
> Candidly I be at variance, you revealed that after engaging with the Brand
> Registry Group (BRG) during their session you got aware of how little they
> understand the importance of UA and its operations, this display show much
> our ambassadors and comms team is lacking in spreading awareness. Your
> statement is bit surprising why we need to wait for next F2F at an ICANN
> meeting, is knowledge transfer depended on F2F meetings only and you mean
> that it can’t be done on remote. Comms team should just be open for
> opportunities to engage with them even is its on remote and share the
> information most primitively. who knows next ICANN will also be on remote
> in given circumstances.
>
>
>
> Sorry but i believe that Individuals have a duty to move yonder
> self-centeredness or eyeing vested interest in such opportunities  of being
> travelling funded for such activities if it can be done over remote.
>
>
> Kuan Ting
>
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 2:50 AM Mark W. Datysgeld <
> mark at governanceprimer.com> wrote:
>
> After having engaged with the Brand Registry Group (BRG) during their
> session yesterday, I have grown very aware of how little they understand
> the importance of UA for their operations. They seem to be under the
> impression that our work only involves IDNs or some variation of this idea.
>
> Moving forward, I propose that we engage more strongly with this group.
> I will make sure to be present to talk about UA during their next F2F at
> an ICANN meeting, whenever this whole remote phase passes. On the
> meantime, please keep your eyes open for opportunities to engage with them.
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Mark W. Datysgeld from Governance Primer [www.markwd.website]
> In partnership with AR-TARC and the Brazilian Association of Software
> Companies (ABES)
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your
> personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance
> with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and
> the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can
> visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or
> configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or
> disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ua-comms/attachments/20200311/41c5b2f9/attachment-0001.html>