[UA-discuss] SAC095 - SSAC Advisory on the Use of Emojiin Domain

Stuart Stuple stuartst at microsoft.com
Mon May 29 21:39:05 UTC 2017

Thought I had. <grin>

I continue to believe - despite the excellent clarity of opinions presented - that emoji should be considered approprIate for indentifiers. I don't see any of the points raised in the article as compelling.

But I am completely willing to accept that is my ignorance.


The smaller keyboard and use of voice recognition may increase my incoherence. Apologies. Feel free to ask for clarification of my word choices.

Get Outlook<https://aka.ms/qtex0l> for iOS

On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 2:18 PM -0700, "Asmus Freytag" <asmusf at ix.netcom.com<mailto:asmusf at ix.netcom.com>> wrote:

On 5/29/2017 9:12 AM, Stuart Stuple via UA-discuss wrote:

I understand the perspective that emoji are more variable than text as the emotional impact of the variations of emoji.

The "emo" in "emoji" has absolutely nothing to do with the word (or the concept of) "emotion".

This was rather cleanly summarized in the SSAC paper, which immediately leads to the question of whether anyone in this discussion has read more than the headline on that paper....

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ua-discuss/attachments/20170529/0e75c285/attachment.html>

More information about the UA-discuss mailing list