[UA-discuss] Fun with Unicode

[Peter Saint-Andre]

With my Mozilla hat on, yes, bug reports are always welcome. Migrating
from IDNA2003 to IDNA2008 is, of course, a big effort...

On 11/9/18 5:21 PM, Mark Svancarek (CELA) via UA-discuss wrote:
> Should we file bugs against browsers with these behaviors?
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs at anvilwalrusden.com> 
> Sent: Friday, November 9, 2018 4:19 PM
> To: Mark Svancarek (CELA) <marksv at microsoft.com>; ua-discuss at icann.org
> Subject: Re: [UA-discuss] Fun with Unicode
> 
> Many of these are invalid under 2008.  Yet another example where sticking to the old protocol or UTS#46 hurts us.
> 
> A
> 
> --
> Please excuse my clumbsy thums
> ----------
> On November 10, 2018 04:19:35 "Mark Svancarek \(CELA\) via UA-discuss" 
> <ua-discuss at icann.org> wrote:
> 
>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fshksp
>> r.mobi%2Fblog%2F2018%2F11%2Fdomain-hacks-with-unusual-unicode-characte
>> rs%2F&data=02%7C01%7Cmarksv%40microsoft.com%7C25ef81dd6f7c415d3fb0
>> 08d646a22738%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C636774059725
>> 382049&sdata=4tKv6zQWKCHBTTMrwz24D4d90iom%2B%2BRcFrWk00uclew%3D&am
>> p;reserved=0
>>
>> Actually, the remapping by browsers seems bad
> 
> 
>