[UA-discuss] interesting to note about emoji in mailbox name.

Asmus Freytag asmusf at ix.netcom.com
Tue Apr 16 18:11:48 UTC 2019

On 4/16/2019 8:24 AM, John Levine wrote:
>> So, instead, what of defining good mailbox naming practice for just 
>> one of the orthography categories? This could serve to illustrate 
>> both good practice (Universal Acceptance) and bad practice 
>> (Uncritical Acceptance).
> Sorry, what do you mean by "orthography categories"?  There's plenty 
> of advice about scripts and character classes and confusables that we 
> can build on.

I think this is intended to cover what I would call "modern, everyday 
general use", or the letters that people learn in school, as opposed to 
arcane, outdated, specialized code points for the same languages and 
scripts that are also in Unicode for use by scholars and other 
specialized and expert users.

The proposal is apparently to pick an example for didactic purposes.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ua-discuss/attachments/20190416/22018d0f/attachment.html>

More information about the UA-discuss mailing list