[UA-discuss] First Draft: UASG024 - UA Readiness of Command Line Tools

[Dušan Stojičević]

Looks good to me also, but I would change only one thing -  Readiness status, first paragraph, “and then do something with them” – it looks to me like a magic J 

We can use something more precise like “and then do processing them” or something similar.

Also, I think this report can be published as a blog… 

 

Dusan

 

From: UA-discuss [mailto:ua-discuss-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Mark Svancarek (CELA) via UA-discuss
Sent: 23. април 2019. 20:26
To: don.hollander <don.hollander at icann.org>; ua-discuss at icann.org
Subject: Re: [UA-discuss] First Draft: UASG024 - UA Readiness of Command Line Tools

 

Looks good to me.

 

From: UA-discuss <ua-discuss-bounces at icann.org <mailto:ua-discuss-bounces at icann.org> > On Behalf Of Don Hollander
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2019 21:30
To: ua-discuss at icann.org <mailto:ua-discuss at icann.org> 
Subject: [UA-discuss] First Draft: UASG024 - UA Readiness of Command Line Tools

 

One of the requests that came out of the Barcelona meeting was to do a review of the UA Readiness of Command Line Tools.

 

Here’s a draft of the report https://1drv.ms/w/s!Aq2WU6G5jDZ5grIaNq1p5JhSusI26A <https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/ap/w-59584e83/?url=https%3A%2F%2F1drv.ms%2Fw%2Fs!Aq2WU6G5jDZ5grIaNq1p5JhSusI26A&data=02%7C01%7Cmarksv%40microsoft.com%7Cd26ba46bf27b46dc057b08d6c7a48615%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C636915906777083656&sdata=I8BRs%2B%2Bxm5fLWitSDyKzzqamP74D2WVkjFIzVibQCUU%3D&reserved=0> 

 

Can I please have comments before the end of the month?

 

Thanks.

 

Don

 

 

 

 

Don Hollander

Secretary General – UASG

Skype: Don_Hollander

 



---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ua-discuss/attachments/20190423/a117fdb0/attachment.html>