[UA-discuss] . ευ

Asmus Freytag asmusf at ix.netcom.com
Fri Sep 13 03:15:14 UTC 2019

On 9/12/2019 6:40 PM, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 06:27:49PM -0700, Asmus Freytag wrote:
>> Which would be a proper concern, but not if EURID applied for both.
> Why?  The mere fact that the same operator operates two TLDs does not
> imply that they are actually or reasonably related in any way.  For
> instance, com and net are both operated by Verisign, but they have
> nothing to do with each other and there is no reason to suppose that a
> given label in .com has anything to do with the identical label in
> .net.  The fact that two strings are merely visually similar to one
> another similarly does not give us reason to suppose the policies in
> one will be affected by decisions in the other (nor, for that matter,
> that they should be).  And it's quite clear that "bundling" of names
> has been roundly rejected by the market except maybe in a couple quite
> specific cases.

Well, if that's the case we categorically shouldn't allow any 
allocatable variants
for TLDs, but the procedure you authored contemplates precisely that.

Confused !?!


> Best regards,
> A

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ua-discuss/attachments/20190912/c03480e0/attachment.html>

More information about the UA-discuss mailing list