[UA-Measurement] Action required: please review ICANN79 UASG Plan and Governance Slides

Fariz Ahmadi farizahmadi at protonmail.com
Tue Feb 27 13:24:40 UTC 2024


Hi

In light of the Multistakeholder model's commitment by ICANN and its groups, why are decisions taken in the Universal Acceptance Steering Group (UASG) not inclusive and transparent? In particular, with reference to the recent notion of UASG leadership implementing a Statement of Intent (SOI) without seeking community consensus?
Is it not the case that UASG should have asked for community agreement, assembled a small group to determine the specifics of the SOI implementation, presented the results to the community for approval, and then made the announcement?

@Anil Given that these actions help to guarantee that democratic procedures are followed within the organization, is it justifiable for you as the chair of the UASG to authorize them? The community has no objections to have SOI but will not accept the SOI implementation procedure adopted by UASG, and its timliness will embarrass the UASG leadership.

Fariz Ahmadi

On Tuesday, February 27th, 2024 at 6:19 PM, Seda Akbulut via UA-Measurement <ua-measurement at icann.org> wrote:

> Dear Measurement WG members,
>
> Please find the Draft slide deck for ICANN79 5-year plan and governance session.
>
> Each WG will share their 5-year action plan. Kindly review the action plan of your WG and share your input on the document.
>
> Slide: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1qvHcSeOj7O-3k6oEsxWtYkygKXaOQ9eC/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=105070594727628493745&rtpof=true&sd=true
>
> Also please find it in pdf attached.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Seda Akbulut
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ua-measurement/attachments/20240227/88f76298/attachment.html>


More information about the UA-Measurement mailing list