[Ws2-jurisdiction] Third Draft of Experience Solicitation Questions

[Kavouss Arasteh]

Grec,
What happened to the question 3 that was on the mailing list last night?
Did you totally suppress that because two or three persons objected?
We are a group of some 40 persons and should be influenced by the views of
some people
Pls put the question back into the list and try to soften that so as does
not give the impression that we are attempting to move from
Multistakeholder Approach  to different Approach
Regards
Kavouss



2016-12-05 3:58 GMT+01:00 Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc at gmail.com>:

> All:
>
> Based on discussions on our last call and the list, I've revised these
> questions as follows (added text underlined).  Please reply to this email
> with any comments or suggested changes.
>
> Greg
>
> 1.       Has your business, your privacy or your ability to use or
> purchase DNS-related services been affected by ICANN's jurisdiction* in any
> way?
>
> If the answer is Yes, please describe specific cases, situations or
> incidents, including the date, the parties involved, and links to any
> relevant documents.  Please note that *“affected”* may *refer to *positive
> *and/*or negative *effects*.
>
> 2.       Has ICANN's jurisdiction* affected any dispute resolution process
> or litigation related to domain names you have been involved in?
>
> If the answer is Yes, please describe specific cases, situations or
> incidents, including the date, the parties involved, and links to any
> relevant documents.    Please note that *“affected”* may *refer to*
> positive *and/*or negative *effects*.
>
> 3.       Do you have copies of and/or links to any *verifiable* reports
> of experiences of other parties that would be responsive to the questions
> above?
>
> If the answer is yes, please provide these copies and/or links.
>
> _____________________________
>
> *  For these questions, “ICANN’s jurisdiction” refers to (a) ICANN being
> subject to U.S. and California law as a result of its incorporation and
> location in California, (b) ICANN being subject to the laws of any other
> country as a result of its location or contacts with that country, or (c)
> any “choice of law” or venue provisions in agreements with ICANN.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ws2-jurisdiction mailing list
> Ws2-jurisdiction at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ws2-jurisdiction/attachments/20161205/f2d72ce8/attachment.html>