[Ws2-jurisdiction] MEMBER POLL ON PROPOSED QUESTIONS FOR QUESTIONNAIRE

[Kavouss Arasteh]

Dear All,
I do not understand the usefulness of such poll when the majority are those
who attend every and all meetings mostly from one country.
This does not represent multi stakeholder but single stakeholder.
The  approach much conform to the CCWG charter  .
It is important to know the affiliation of those participating in the poll.
We need to know the rules of the game.
If a simple majority is involve that majorité from a single country that is
not multistakeholder at all
Regards
Kavouss

2016-12-12 22:11 GMT+01:00 Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc at gmail.com>:

> Kavouss,
>
> I believe you are incorrect with regard to how subgroups work.  In the
> subgroups, all participants are equal.  Since members and participants were
> allowed to choose their own subgroups, there is no "proper representation"
> in or for any subgroup.  All subgroup participants have an equal voice, in
> the group and in the poll.
>
> However, since you have included the co-chairs, I'm sure they can weigh in
> as well.
>
> Greg
>
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 3:44 PM, Kavouss Arasteh <
> kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Grec,
>> I do not understnd your statement.
>> In order to maintain the  proper representation of various responder ,we
>> need to know their affiliation as only those official Members of CCWG WS 2
>> should be counted as they were nominated by chartering organizations .
>> PLS KINDLY RESPECT THE PRINCIPLES GOVERNING THE POLL APPROACH
>> Regards
>> Kavouss
>>
>> 2016-12-12 21:00 GMT+01:00 Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc at gmail.com>:
>>
>>> Kavouss,
>>>
>>> I will take this as a request to provide the record of who participated
>>> in the poll and what their answers were.  This seems appropriate since this
>>> is available when we do "checks and crosses."
>>>
>>> We did not collect information on the responders' "affiliation" or who
>>> they "represent," so I would have no basis to give this information.
>>>  (Note: I don't think we have any responder who represents "the global
>>> community [of] multistakeholders.")
>>>
>>> In any event, each member has equal standing in the subgroup and their
>>> response will therefore count equally.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>>
>>> Greg
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 2:27 PM, Kavouss Arasteh <
>>> kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Grec,
>>>> I understand that you may discuss or at least inform the sub group of
>>>> the results of POLL.
>>>> In that case ,Please kindly indicate for each reply the persons and its
>>>> affiliation as it is important to know to what extent the responders are
>>>> representing the  global community multistakeholder and NOT stakeholder of
>>>> a handful number of countries mostly
>>>> Regards
>>>> Kavouss
>>>>
>>>> 2016-12-12 3:58 GMT+01:00 Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc at gmail.com>:
>>>>
>>>>> All Members:
>>>>>
>>>>> Here is the link to the poll to determine support for each of the
>>>>> proposed questions for the questionnaire discussed on our last two calls.
>>>>>
>>>>> https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScaMJ8CKRafytThamnj
>>>>> 7YcmgdHB0Kpe9-8x34LkUIdLjD4H6Q/viewform
>>>>>
>>>>> The poll is very short and should only take a few minutes of your
>>>>> time.  Please complete the poll before our call on Tuesday, December 13 at
>>>>> 13:00 UTC.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you.
>>>>>
>>>>> Greg Shatan
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Ws2-jurisdiction mailing list
>>>>> Ws2-jurisdiction at icann.org
>>>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ws2-jurisdiction/attachments/20161212/1c46ff7b/attachment.html>