[Ws2-jurisdiction] first draft of fact solicitation questions

CW Mail mail at christopherwilkinson.eu
Wed Nov 23 18:04:05 UTC 2016


Mike: I might see the point of broadening, if possible, the scope and catchment of the questions, but perhaps not in that way.

We should be dealing with Principals (in the sense of directly with those responsible for the entities concerned). Not their surrogates or other third parties.
Otherwise we risk receiving second hand information with which the Principals may not agree, and inviting 'bulk' replies from interested organisations.

We should also be cautious about receiving anonymous hearsay.

Just a thought

CW




On 23 Nov 2016, at 17:20, Mike Rodenbaugh <mike at rodenbaugh.com> wrote:

> These seem well-stated, except perhaps they should not be looking only for personal experience, but broaden the request to seek any experience the responder is aware of?  So I suggest something like:
> 
> 1.       Are you aware of any instance in which anyone's business, privacy, or ability to use or purchase DNS-related services, has been affected by ICANN's jurisdiction in any way?
> 
> If the answer is Yes, please describe specific cases or incidents, including the date, the parties involved, and links to any relevant documents.
> 
> 2.       Are you aware of any instance in which ICANN's jurisdiction affected any dispute resolution process or litigation related to domain names?
> 
> If the answer is Yes, please describe specific cases or incidents, including the date, the parties involved, and links to any relevant documents.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Mike Rodenbaugh
> RODENBAUGH LAW
> tel/fax:  +1.415.738.8087
> http://rodenbaugh.com 
> 
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 6:47 AM, Mueller, Milton L <milton at gatech.edu> wrote:
> CW and I have agreed on the following draft:
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> Request for stakeholder input on jurisdiction issues
> 
>  
> 
> The Jurisdiction subgroup of the CCWG Accountability is asking for the community to provide factual input on the following questions:
> 
>  
> 
> 1.       Has your business, your privacy or your ability to use or purchase DNS-related services, been affected by ICANN's jurisdiction in any way?
> 
> If the answer is Yes, please describe specific cases or incidents, including the date, the parties involved, and links to any relevant documents.
> 
>  
> 
> 2.       Has ICANN's jurisdiction affected any dispute resolution process or litigation related to domain names you have been involved in?
> 
> If the answer is Yes, please describe specific cases or incidents, including the date, the parties involved, and links to any relevant documents.
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> Dr. Milton L. Mueller
> 
> Professor, School of Public Policy
> 
> Georgia Institute of Technology
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ws2-jurisdiction mailing list
> Ws2-jurisdiction at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ws2-jurisdiction mailing list
> Ws2-jurisdiction at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ws2-jurisdiction/attachments/20161123/76b9f6fb/attachment.html>


More information about the Ws2-jurisdiction mailing list