[Ws2-jurisdiction] first draft of fact solicitation questions

[Kavouss Arasteh]

Dear Milton
THESE ARE DRAFT QUESTIONS WHICH MUST BE DISCUSSED AT sub group and APPROVED
BY CCWG.
No single or any little group are maters of others .
We are equal and free to suggest any thing that we think appropriate .
We are not here to directly or indirectly defend or offend any specific
arrangements
We must work together in a collaborative manner
Regards
Kavouss

2016-11-26 9:25 GMT+01:00 Mueller, Milton L <milton at gatech.edu>:

> Sorry, Parminder, I see this as a request for opinions, not facts. The
> whole point of this exercise is to gain specific factual cases that show
> actual issues, not to provide people with an excuse to complain about what
> the “think are the problems.” I would reject adding such a question to the
> list
>
>
>
> *From:* ws2-jurisdiction-bounces at icann.org [mailto:ws2-jurisdiction-
> bounces at icann.org] *On Behalf Of *parminder
> *Sent:* Wednesday, November 23, 2016 11:54 PM
> *To:* ws2-jurisdiction at icann.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Ws2-jurisdiction] first draft of fact solicitation
> questions
>
>
>
> I will like to add a general question to the below:
>
> What do you think are the problems, if any, with continued jurisdiction of
> the US state over ICANN, as a US non-profit? Please justify your response
> with appropriate examples, analysis, etc. Especially, if there are existing
> and past instances that highlight such problems please indicate them.
>
> parminder
>
>
>
> On Wednesday 23 November 2016 09:50 PM, Mike Rodenbaugh wrote:
>
> These seem well-stated, except perhaps they should not be looking only for
> personal experience, but broaden the request to seek any experience the
> responder is aware of?  So I suggest something like:
>
>
>
> 1.       Are you aware of any instance in which anyone's business,
> privacy, or ability to use or purchase DNS-related services, has been
> affected by ICANN's jurisdiction in any way?
>
> If the answer is Yes, please describe specific cases or incidents,
> including the date, the parties involved, and links to any relevant
> documents.
>
> 2.       Are you aware of any instance in which ICANN's jurisdiction
> affected any dispute resolution process or litigation related to domain
> names?
>
> If the answer is Yes, please describe specific cases or incidents,
> including the date, the parties involved, and links to any relevant
> documents.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Mike Rodenbaugh
>
> RODENBAUGH LAW
>
> tel/fax:  +1.415.738.8087
>
> http://rodenbaugh.com
>
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 6:47 AM, Mueller, Milton L <milton at gatech.edu>
> wrote:
>
> CW and I have agreed on the following draft:
>
>
>
>
>
> *Request for stakeholder input on jurisdiction issues*
>
>
>
> The Jurisdiction subgroup of the CCWG Accountability is asking for the
> community to provide factual input on the following questions:
>
>
>
> 1.       Has your business, your privacy or your ability to use or
> purchase DNS-related services, been affected by ICANN's jurisdiction in any
> way?
>
> If the answer is Yes, please describe specific cases or incidents,
> including the date, the parties involved, and links to any relevant
> documents.
>
>
>
> 2.       Has ICANN's jurisdiction affected any dispute resolution process
> or litigation related to domain names you have been involved in?
>
> If the answer is Yes, please describe specific cases or incidents,
> including the date, the parties involved, and links to any relevant
> documents.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Dr. Milton L. Mueller
>
> Professor, School of Public Policy
>
> Georgia Institute of Technology
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ws2-jurisdiction mailing list
> Ws2-jurisdiction at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Ws2-jurisdiction mailing list
>
> Ws2-jurisdiction at icann.org
>
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ws2-jurisdiction mailing list
> Ws2-jurisdiction at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ws2-jurisdiction/attachments/20161126/52920e90/attachment.html>