[Ws2-jurisdiction] WRITTEN ANSWERS TO THE QUESTIONS RAISED DURING THE CALL

[Cheryl Langdon-Orr]

I agree with you (on this ☺️) Paul

On 2 Aug. 2017 09:33, "Paul Rosenzweig" <
paul.rosenzweig at redbranchconsulting.com> wrote:

> Dear Subgroup members
>
>
>
> I want to respectfully note my full support for Greg’s process here.  We
> act as a subgroup.  No individual member has any right that I am aware of
> to demand action from ICANN, from the CCWG or from the Subgroup.
>
>
>
> In particular, I want to publicly defend Greg against any claim that he is
> “not acting properly” or that his behavior is either “unprecedented” or
> “unacceptable” or “unfair.”  I also disagree that Greg is “wasting . . .
> time” or that he needs to “behave” or that there are “motivations”
> (presumably nefarious) “behind his actions.”  Quite to the contrary Greg
> has been a model of decorum and neutrality in a difficult position and any
> suggestion otherwise is without factual foundation.
>
>
>
> Regards to all
>
> Paul
>
>
>
> Paul Rosenzweig
>
> paul.rosenzweig at redbranchconsulting.com
>
> O: +1 (202) 547-0660 <+1%20202-547-0660>
>
> M: +1 (202) 329-9650 <+1%20202-329-9650>
>
> VOIP: +1 (202) 738-1739 <+1%20202-738-1739>
>
> www.redbranchconsulting.com
>
> My PGP Key: https://keys.mailvelope.com/pks/lookup?op=get&search=
> 0x9A830097CA066684
>
>
>
> *From:* ws2-jurisdiction-bounces at icann.org [mailto:ws2-jurisdiction-
> bounces at icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Arasteh
> *Sent:* Tuesday, August 1, 2017 5:36 PM
> *To:* Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc at gmail.com>
> *Cc:* ws2-jurisdiction <ws2-jurisdiction at icann.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [Ws2-jurisdiction] WRITTEN ANSWERS TO THE QUESTIONS RAISED
> DURING THE CALL
>
>
>
> Greg
>
> What do you mean by sub group decides
>
> You  are blocking all my roquets
>
> I raised questions they were answered incomplete or not answered at all
>
> This  us my  right to ask written answer and gas nothing to do with the
> approval if the group
>
> I am tired of thus sort of
>
> blacking.
>
> You are not acting properly and I formally register complaint for such
> unfair tressent.
>
> Your behaviour is not acceptable and categorically rejected
>
> I do not agree that you treat a member of the group so aggressively
>
> You have interrupted me with an unprecedented behaviour
>
> Pls explain.
>
> You act negatively to all my proposal
>
> You di not want to find a solution for these problems
>
> You just wasting our time
>
> We disagree with your working method.
>
> Either behave or .....
>
> Reply. Explain
>
> There are motivation behind your
>
>  unfair actions
>
> Kavouss
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>
> On 1 Aug 2017, at 21:55, Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Kavouss,
>
>
>
> Kindly direct your request to the Subgroup, and not to Sam.  This is a
> matter for the Subgroup to consider, rather than any individual
> participant.  The Subgroup can take up your request and decide whether to
> ask for written responses to questions (and if so, which questions).  Thank
> you.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
>
>
> Greg
>
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Kavouss Arasteh <
> kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Dear Sam, With tks to your presentation, pls kindly note that I nned
> written answers to the questions raised before the meeting and those during
> the meeing either as intervention or in the chat.
>
> Regards
>
> Kavouss
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ws2-jurisdiction mailing list
> Ws2-jurisdiction at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ws2-jurisdiction/attachments/20170802/37bc0458/attachment.html>