[Ws2-jurisdiction] RES: RES: RES: ISSUE - unilateral jurisdiction of one country over ICANN

[parminder]

On Monday 21 August 2017 04:58 PM, Nigel Roberts wrote:
> I'm sure that formulation will go down well on the OFAC General
> License application form, and with Ted Cruz .  . .

Nigel, I will respectfully urge you to give up your cryptic one liners,
most of which we from the non english non-western world are unable to
understand. Neither does the sarcasm contained therein contribute to
what is a very serious exercise of global responsibility that we are
trying to undertake here. Please be very clear and explicit in whatever
you want to say, and try simple and plain english, with fewer idioms and
situated facts rooted in western culture.....

As for what I understand from your above remark, if your suggestion is
that we, of the non US world, play nice and deferential to every quirk
and detail of the US nation and state, let me make it very clear that I
have no such intention. I much respect the US nation and state, but then
so do I respect every other country, and the democratic rights of their
citizens.

parminder
>
>
>
> On 21/08/17 12:08, parminder wrote:
>>
>> On Monday 21 August 2017 04:29 PM, Nigel Roberts wrote:
>>> And what will ICANN then be immune from?
>>
>> Milton put it nicely, to quote, "...from the vagaries of U.S. foreign
>> policy or other laws and policies that would circumvent ICANN’s
>> accountability to its global MS community."
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Ws2-jurisdiction mailing list
>>> Ws2-jurisdiction at icann.org
>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ws2-jurisdiction mailing list
>> Ws2-jurisdiction at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Ws2-jurisdiction mailing list
> Ws2-jurisdiction at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction
>