[Ws2-jurisdiction] [Issue and Solution] Non-US Based Registrars and Following OFAC

[Raphaël BEAUREGARD-LACROIX]

This would make a nice side (but separate) recommendation to a main OFAC
recommendation that seems to be taking shape as of today's call. In any
case I would support it and I would like to bump it up for discussion since
the list is moving quickly these days.

Best,

2017-08-21 1:42 GMT+02:00 Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji at gmail.com>:

> For starters is there a reference on ICANN page of OFAC prohibited
> transactions in context of ICANN business?
>
> Cheers!
>
> Sent from my mobile
> Kindly excuse brevity and typos
>
> On Aug 20, 2017 3:41 PM, "Nigel Roberts" <nigel at channelisles.net> wrote:
>
>> A corrollary of this are companies applying OFAC  on a 'just in case'
>> basis, when the transactions in question are not prohibited transactions
>>
>> On 20/08/17 15:22, farzaneh badii wrote:
>>
>>> One of the jurisdictional issues that were discussed is that some non-US
>>> based registrars apply OFAC even when they are not obliged to and merely
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ws2-jurisdiction mailing list
>> Ws2-jurisdiction at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ws2-jurisdiction mailing list
> Ws2-jurisdiction at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction
>
>


-- 
Raphaël Beauregard-Lacroix
LinkedIn
<https://www.linkedin.com/in/rapha%C3%ABl-beauregard-lacroix-88733786/> -
@rbl0012 <https://twitter.com/rbl0112> - M: +33 7 86 39 18 15
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ws2-jurisdiction/attachments/20170824/3793b0b7/attachment.html>