[Ws2-jurisdiction] Jurisdiction Questionnaire: RESPONSE REQUESTED

[Paul Rosenzweig]

What time is the call tomorrow?  I apologize, but I lost track of our scheduling decisions.

 

Paul

 

Paul Rosenzweig

 <mailto:paul.rosenzweig at redbranchconsulting.com> paul.rosenzweig at redbranchconsulting.com

O: +1 (202) 547-0660

M: +1 (202) 329-9650

VOIP: +1 (202) 738-1739

 <http://www.redbranchconsulting.com/> www.redbranchconsulting.com

My PGP Key:  <https://keys.mailvelope.com/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x9A830097CA066684> https://keys.mailvelope.com/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x9A830097CA066684

 

From: Phil Corwin [mailto:psc at vlaw-dc.com] 
Sent: Monday, January 9, 2017 3:16 PM
To: Paul Rosenzweig <paul.rosenzweig at redbranchconsulting.com>; 'Mueller, Milton L' <milton at gatech.edu>
Cc: ws2-jurisdiction at icann.org
Subject: RE: [Ws2-jurisdiction] Jurisdiction Questionnaire: RESPONSE REQUESTED

 

Whatever the WG’s decision, I certainly hope we can decide this with finality on tomorrow’s call. Because right now we are like a car spinning its tires and just sinking deeper into the mud. We have already spent far too much time on this questionnaire matter.

 

Philip S. Corwin, Founding Principal

Virtualaw LLC

1155 F Street, NW

Suite 1050

Washington, DC 20004

202-559-8597/Direct

202-559-8750/Fax

202-255-6172/Cell

 

Twitter: @VlawDC

 

"Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey

 

From: ws2-jurisdiction-bounces at icann.org <mailto:ws2-jurisdiction-bounces at icann.org>  [mailto:ws2-jurisdiction-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Paul Rosenzweig
Sent: Monday, January 09, 2017 3:02 PM
To: 'Mueller, Milton L'
Cc: ws2-jurisdiction at icann.org <mailto:ws2-jurisdiction at icann.org> 
Subject: Re: [Ws2-jurisdiction] Jurisdiction Questionnaire: RESPONSE REQUESTED

 

I gather, however, that some disagree and say “all now or none ever.”  If that is my choice I choose none.  If the idea of separation gains any traction, I’d be open to consideration but I fear it would not bet any better definition later and we would just be kicking the can down the road.

 

Paul

 

Paul Rosenzweig

 <mailto:paul.rosenzweig at redbranchconsulting.com> paul.rosenzweig at redbranchconsulting.com

O: +1 (202) 547-0660

M: +1 (202) 329-9650

VOIP: +1 (202) 738-1739

 <http://www.redbranchconsulting.com/> www.redbranchconsulting.com

My PGP Key:  <https://keys.mailvelope.com/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x9A830097CA066684> https://keys.mailvelope.com/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x9A830097CA066684

 

From: Mueller, Milton L [mailto:milton at gatech.edu] 
Sent: Monday, January 9, 2017 2:28 PM
To: Paul Rosenzweig <paul.rosenzweig at redbranchconsulting.com <mailto:paul.rosenzweig at redbranchconsulting.com> >
Cc: ws2-jurisdiction at icann.org <mailto:ws2-jurisdiction at icann.org> 
Subject: RE: [Ws2-jurisdiction] Jurisdiction Questionnaire: RESPONSE REQUESTED

 

Paul

 

Others in the group feel strongly that question 4 should go out.  Some feel so strongly that they are of the view that it is all or nothing.  While I don’t agree with them and while I certainly don’t agree with the idea that saying “all or nothing” is respectful of other people, I am not going to try any longer to change their minds.

 

MM: Those who suggest that we should not send out a fact-finding missive at all because of Q4 also seem to be taking an “all or nothing approach” are they not? 

The reasonable solution, as I have said before, is to separate Q4 from the others and work on it some more to make it take a form that is acceptable to a broader range of WG participants. 

 

  _____  

No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com/email-signature> 
Version: 2016.0.7996 / Virus Database: 4749/13706 - Release Date: 01/04/17

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ws2-jurisdiction/attachments/20170109/5100b78f/attachment.html>