[Ws2-jurisdiction] Jurisdiction Questionnaire: Next Steps

[CW Mail]

Good evening:

Thankyou Greg. Glad we are now getting to the practical phase of this enquiry. I recall already pointing out that it would be necessary to address the questions to as wide a spectrum as possible of potentially interested parties, globally.

1.	I would not favour a passive publication on ICANN or IANA sites. Nor a public comment request, which it is not.

2.	If the questionnaire is published as a survey, which would be more appropriate, then it would be desirable to send a 'push' message to all relevant addresses.

	Here, I think we need some guidance from ICANN staff. How does ICANN collect and maintain the data bases of addresses for all members of the relevant communities?
	For instance, I recall that the studies conducted for the CCT ('competition and consumer trust') WG collected information and statistics from a large number of respondents. How was that done?

3.	In any event, the questionnaire should be translated into all the ICANN working languages before publication. We could be getting on with that whilst the other issues are being addressed.

Regards 

CW


On 19 Jan 2017, at 07:04, Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc at gmail.com> wrote:

> All,
> 
> As you probably know by now, the Questionnaire was approved without objection by the CCWG Plenary.  A copy of the final version is attached.
> 
> We now need to work on the next steps of publishing and announcing the Questionnaire.
> 
> The time period the questionnaire will be open is under discussion in a different thread in the CCWG-Accountability mailing list.  I urge you to contribute to that discussion.
> 
> The method of publication of the Questionnaire needs to be finalized, as does the method (or methods) of submission of responses.
> 
> Method:
> 
> The Questionnaire could be published on a webpage of the ICANN site in text and  submissions could be made by email (with the response either in email text or in attachments).
> 
> Alternatively, the Questionnaire could be published as a survey, using www.surveymonkey.com or Google Forms or some other application.  Survey/form inputs can help the process of aggregating the answers (e.g., Google Forms puts the answers on a spreadsheet).  However, since the answers will be free text fields and links, and could include documentary attachments, a survey form may not be ideal.
> 
> If we publish the Questionnaire on the ICANN website, the next question is where and how will it be published?  
> 
> 1.  One possibility is the ICANN Public Comment page.  The Public Comment page found at https://www.icann.org/public-comments describes Public Comments as follows: 
> 
> Public Comment is a vital element in ICANN's decision-making process whereby the community is given an opportunity to comment upon proposals initiated by a working group or staff department.  
> 
> This is not a Public Comment, since we are not asking for comment on a proposal. It might be misleading to announce the questionnaire on the Public Comment page and to publish it on a page formatted like a Public Comment and under the public comment taxonomy.  The Public Comment pages contain a lot of additional explanatory text that is not appropriate here.
> 
> 2.  Another possibility is to announce the questionnaire on the IANA Stewardship & Accountability home page at https://www.icann.org/stewardship-accountability.  This page is in the home page menu on https://www.icann.org/ (as is the Public Comment page).  The questionnaire can then be published under the stewardship-accountability taxonomy, and simply present the Questionnaire without other text.
> 
> There may be other possibilities.
> 
> Regardless, the Questionnaire can be publicized through the usual ICANN methods (e.g., News and Announcements on home page and News page (https://www.icann.org/news), ICANN Daily Digest, annouincements sent to SOAC contacts, etc.)
> 
> Please reply with any comments you may have.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Greg
> 
> <Final Jurisdiction Subqroup Questionnaire.doc><Final Jurisdiction Subqroup Questionnaire.pdf>_______________________________________________
> Ws2-jurisdiction mailing list
> Ws2-jurisdiction at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ws2-jurisdiction/attachments/20170119/e3ac238a/attachment-0001.html>