[Ws2-jurisdiction] OFAC Application , Sanction on the use of DNS

[Greg Shatan]

Here's a copy of the PDF of the document Bernie mentioned.

Greg

On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 1:59 PM, Bernard Turcotte <
turcotte.bernard at gmail.com> wrote:

> All,
>
> ICANN legal has pointed out that the GAO of the USG has published a report
> which deals with this and may be useful to the Jurisdiction sub-group:
>
> http://www.gao.gov/products/B-327398.
>
> Cheers
>
> B.
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 11:18 AM
> Subject: Re: [Ws2-jurisdiction] OFAC Application , Sanction on the use of
> DNS
> To: "McAuley, David" <dmcauley at verisign.com>
> Cc: "RPEREZGA at minetur.es" <RPEREZGA at minetur.es>, "occ at mrecic.gov.ar" <
> occ at mrecic.gov.ar>, "ws2-jurisdiction at icann.org" <
> ws2-jurisdiction at icann.org>, "alice at dotafrica.org" <alice at dotafrica.org>
>
>
> Dear David
> Thanks for initial thoughts which is quite helpful.
> One point to bring to your kind attention is we need with the help of
> Jones Day and Mathieu Weil to investigate is whether DNS , and in
> particular, is an asset of any country or it is a common resource available
> to every and all countries for use under certain specific rules and
> conditions since if it does not fulfill those rules or conditions of use
> certain other actions would be applied.
> Should we conclude that it is not an asset attributed or belong to any
> country then we would be in a better position to express our views in
> relation to the corresponding jurisdiction
> Kavouss
>
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On 23 Jan 2017, at 14:52, McAuley, David <dmcauley at verisign.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks Greg for getting this underway.
>
>
>
> I meant to volunteer to help but I will be unable to lead this effort due
> to commitments elsewhere.
>
>
>
> I also think this idea (reviewing ICANN litigation) would benefit from a
> presentation by Jones Day, the common element through much of this. That,
> of course, is easier said than done and would require ICANN’s client
> permission.
>
>
>
> I also want to note to prospective volunteers that ICANN, IMO, does a nice
> job of indicating the nature of each link in each case compilation under
> its litigation list.
>
>
>
> For example, a link to an order from the court is listed as ‘Order’; a
> court decision is listed as a ‘decision’ and describes the court (trial
> court, appellate court); briefs are listed as ‘briefs’ and described as
> opening, responsive, amicus, etc.
>
>
>
> Thus it ought to be fairly easy to navigate to the most important bits
> first – it is not necessarily an exercise in wading through all courts
> documents – seems less daunting to me than it might have been.
>
>
>
> One more point – to those of us volunteering to review this litigation
> list we ought to start mailing among ourselves as to which cases we are
> reviewing so as to avoid duplication of effort. We may find cases that need
> more than one set of eyes and that would be fine but maybe going in we can
> keep each other apprised of what we are doing.
>
>
>
> David
>
>
>
> David McAuley
>
> International Policy Manager
>
> Verisign Inc.
>
> 703-948-4154 <(703)%20948-4154>
>
>
>
> *From:* Greg Shatan [mailto:gregshatanipc at gmail.com
> <gregshatanipc at gmail.com>]
> *Sent:* Saturday, January 21, 2017 8:33 PM
> *To:* Kavouss Arasteh
> *Cc:* ws2-jurisdiction; McAuley, David; Mathieu.Weill at afnic.fr; León
> Felipe Sánchez Ambía; Thomas Rickert; Perez Galindo, Rafael; Alice Munyua;
> Olga Cavalli; Manal Ismail; DE SALINS Ghislain; Pedro Ivo Ferraz da Silva;
> parminder
> *Subject:* [EXTERNAL] Re: OFAC Application , Sanction on the use of DNS
>
>
>
> I want to clarify that David is a volunteer, but not the
> coordinator/rapporteur for the small group that is preparing litigation
> summaries (unless David wants to be...).  I've just sent an email to the
> list describing the project and seeking more volunteers (including someone
>  to be coordinator/facilitator for the group).
>
>
>
> Also, the small group's task is limited to preparing summaries of ICANN's
> prior and current litigation matters.  Since the article does not deal with
> litigation, it is not germane to the small group's work.
>
>
>
> FYI, the article (by Farzaneh Badii) was originally published (in a less
> colorful form) here: http://www.internetgover
> nance.org/2017/01/13/icanns-jurisdiction-sanctions-and-domain-names/.
>
>
>
> Greg
>
>
>
> On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 2:47 AM, Kavouss Arasteh <
> kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Dear David,
>
> As the rapporteur of small group in sub group WS2 dealing with ICANN
> Litigation, pls find attached an article appreas on the Internet on the
> matter.
>
> We need to seriously address the issue.-
>
> Kavouss
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ws2-jurisdiction mailing list
> Ws2-jurisdiction at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ws2-jurisdiction mailing list
> Ws2-jurisdiction at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ws2-jurisdiction/attachments/20170123/e6952032/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Property Implications of Proposed IANA Transition.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 511667 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ws2-jurisdiction/attachments/20170123/e6952032/PropertyImplicationsofProposedIANATransition-0001.pdf>