[Ws2-jurisdiction] More Volunteers Needed: Litigation Review Team, Questionnaire Response Review Team

[CW Mail]

Dear Greg:

1.	Litigation Review: I shall abstain for lack of legal competence. I assume the team will review DCA and Karl Auerbach's original case, among others.

2.	Questionnaires Review: In principle, I would volunteer. However i would first like to be reassured as to whom the questionnaire has been addressed. e.g.

	-	I believe that a request to respond has not yet been addressed proactively to all the participants in any of the Lists  to which I subscribe.

	-	I recall suggesting that the questionnaire should be addressed, proactively by iCANN, to all the Registries and Registrars and other parties that were addressed during the CCT Studies.
		Has that been done?

This is important because responses from a limited group of CCWG faithful will hardly contribute to the relevance of the enquiry.
Also, the relevant community is mostly not in the United Staters.

Regarding EU Privacy law, ICANN has been informed frequently and authoritatively, over the years, that ICANN policy and US jurisdiction (which?) are inconsistent with all EU-based gTLD Registrars and Registrants respecting EU law.

I assume that the review team is not expecting to receive individual responses from all of them to this effect!

Best regards

CW


On 03 Mar 2017, at 23:38, Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc at gmail.com> wrote:

> All, 
> 
> On this week's call, we discussed two small teams to be populated by volunteers from the Subgroup.  We have some volunteers, but we need more.
> 
> 1.  Litigation Review Team.  Mathieu Weill, David McAuley, myself, Avri Doria and Vidushi Marda are in this team, reviewing and summarizing the litigations that ICANN has been involved in.  We need a few more volunteers.  Please respond if you can review -- even one review will be helpful.
> 
> 2.  Questionnaire Response Review Team.  We need a team to (a) develop a proposal for how the team will review and evaluate responses to the questionnaire (for the approval of the Subgroup), (b) carry out the review and evaluation of the responses (both individually and in the aggregate, to the extent contemplated by the proposal approved by the Subgroup, and (c) recommend how the responses be applied to our work and documents.  Please respond if you can join this team (and if you are interested in coordinating it).
> 
> Initial volunteers are Mathieu, David, Vidushi, Kavouss, Parminder and myself.  If you can join this group, please respond.
> 
> While either group can be joined at any time (but sooner than later), those joining the Questionnaire team now/soon will be there to participate in the development of the proposal described in 2(a) above.
> 
> I want to thank Mathieu, David and Vidushi for doing "double duty" by joining both teams.  However, given the number of participants in this Subgroup, that really should not be necessary.  Please consider volunteering for one of these groups if you haven't done so already.
> 
> Thank you!
> 
> Greg
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Greg Shatan
> C: 917-816-6428
> S: gsshatan
> Phone-to-Skype: 646-845-9428
> gregshatanipc at gmail.com
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ws2-jurisdiction mailing list
> Ws2-jurisdiction at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ws2-jurisdiction/attachments/20170304/f7ca5e0c/attachment.html>