[Ws2-jurisdiction] CCWG-Accountability-WS2-Jurisdiction-Questionnaire-SummaryofResponses

[Greg Shatan]

For purposes of review and evaluation of the individual responses in our
upcoming meetings, it probably makes sense to go to the individual text of
each response, rather than the "review tool."

Greg


*Greg Shatan *C: 917-816-6428
S: gsshatan
Phone-to-Skype: 646-845-9428
gregshatanipc at gmail.com


On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 10:17 AM, <Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch> wrote:

> Dear all
>
>
>
> In addition to the former: the summary does not reflect the answer from
> the “.swiss” registry – in particular the answer to Q1 is (apart from the
> translation issues) not summarized but cut off after the initial general
> paras – leaving out the substance of the answer which deals with specific
> jurisdictional issues.
>
>
>
> Hence, please complete the summary, especially on Q1 and disregard this
> first summary at least as what “.swiss” is concerned.
>
>
>
> Thanks and regards
>
>
>
> Jorge
>
>
>
> *Von:* Cancio Jorge BAKOM
> *Gesendet:* Mittwoch, 3. Mai 2017 16:11
> *An:* 'Bernard Turcotte' <turcotte.bernard at gmail.com>; ws2-jurisdiction <
> ws2-jurisdiction at icann.org>; ACCT-Staff (acct-staff at icann.org) <
> acct-staff at icann.org>
> *Betreff:* AW: [Ws2-jurisdiction] CCWG-Accountability-WS2-
> Jurisdiction-Questionnaire-SummaryofResponses
>
>
>
> Dear all
>
>
>
> Although I have not the time to revise the translation of the „.swiss“
> contribution I note that it is not fully accurate.
>
>
>
> For instance, the response to question 1 is more nuanced (its French
> original says amongst other things, that “it was not evident” for the Swiss
> Government to determine itself to enter into a contract – not that it “was
> not readily determined”…) –
>
>
>
> Hence, a word of caution, a reminder that only the original is “official”,
> and a request to check the translation again.
>
>
>
> Kind regards
>
>
>
> Jorge
>
>
>
> *Von:* ws2-jurisdiction-bounces at icann.org [mailto:ws2-jurisdiction-
> bounces at icann.org <ws2-jurisdiction-bounces at icann.org>] *Im Auftrag von *Bernard
> Turcotte
> *Gesendet:* Dienstag, 2. Mai 2017 22:29
> *An:* ws2-jurisdiction <ws2-jurisdiction at icann.org>; ACCT-Staff (
> acct-staff at icann.org) <acct-staff at icann.org>
> *Betreff:* [Ws2-jurisdiction] CCWG-Accountability-WS2-
> Jurisdiction-Questionnaire-SummaryofResponses
>
>
>
> All,
>
>
>
> As requested at the meeting today please find attached the staff summary
> of the responses to the jurisdiction questionnaire in both Excel and PDF.
>
>
>
> The format should be fairly simple to understand except for the second
> column which is a staff suggestion as to IF the response should be analyzed
> (Yes, No, ?)
>
>
>
> If a response was overly long for this format a part of it is included as
> well as the mention "(long response - see submission)".
>
>
>
> This summary now includes the three translated replies which are also
> attached to this email.
>
>
>
> Please advise if you have any questions.
>
>
>
> Bernard Turcotte
>
> ICANN Staff Support to the CCWG-Accountability WS2
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ws2-jurisdiction mailing list
> Ws2-jurisdiction at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ws2-jurisdiction/attachments/20170503/f236a1c1/attachment.html>