[Ws2-jurisdiction] RES: mandate re ccTLD issues

Alan Greenberg alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca
Fri Sep 15 22:23:11 UTC 2017


Although not important to this discussion, the Board does have the 
authority to initiate a GNSO PDP.

Alan

At 15/09/2017 04:25 PM, Mueller, Milton L wrote:
>
>>The most that the CCWG would have the scope and competence to do 
>>with any such recommendation would be to make it as a suggestion to 
>>the ccNSO to consider. Neither the Board nor any other party can 
>>require the ccNSO to conduct a PDP, and without such a PDP, no 
>>policy affecting ccTLD matters can be made.
>That's fine. The same is true of the GNSO and the ASO for that 
>matter. This subgroup identifies problems and recommends solutions.
>It's up to others to develop policies to implement the solutions.
>
>Dr. Milton Mueller
>Professor, School of Public Policy
>Georgia Institute of Technology



More information about the Ws2-jurisdiction mailing list