[Ws2-jurisdiction] RES: mandate re ccTLD issues
Alan Greenberg
alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca
Fri Sep 15 22:23:11 UTC 2017
Although not important to this discussion, the Board does have the
authority to initiate a GNSO PDP.
Alan
At 15/09/2017 04:25 PM, Mueller, Milton L wrote:
>
>>The most that the CCWG would have the scope and competence to do
>>with any such recommendation would be to make it as a suggestion to
>>the ccNSO to consider. Neither the Board nor any other party can
>>require the ccNSO to conduct a PDP, and without such a PDP, no
>>policy affecting ccTLD matters can be made.
>That's fine. The same is true of the GNSO and the ASO for that
>matter. This subgroup identifies problems and recommends solutions.
>It's up to others to develop policies to implement the solutions.
>
>Dr. Milton Mueller
>Professor, School of Public Policy
>Georgia Institute of Technology
More information about the Ws2-jurisdiction
mailing list