[Ws2-jurisdiction] [Ws2-hr] .cat

[farzaneh badii]

Farzaneh

On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 6:24 AM, Nigel Roberts <nigel at channelisles.net>
wrote:

>
>
> I think this all clearly proves Paul Rosenzweig's point that ICANN's
> jurisdiction is irrelevant as national police forces and judicial
> authorities can apply national law to particular registries.
>
> Under the Treaty of Rome, incidentally, the .CAT registry has the complete
> right to move it's operations to any of the other 27 Member states (soon to
> be 26) of the Union.  If it did that, would ICANN itself then come in the
> firing line from the Spanish courts, perhaps?
>
>
>
> ​
I disagree. ICANN's jurisdiction is the most relevant when it comes to
delegation-redelegation of ccTLDs and accreditation of regirars and
approval of registries. This case does not prove the point that ICANN's
jurisdiction is totally irrelenat under all circumstances.​ As we clearly
demonstrated at the jurisdiction group.




>
> On 20/09/17 09:58, Thomas Rickert wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>> you might find this article interesting.
>>
>> https://www.internetnews.me/2017/09/20/dotcat-registry-offic
>> es-raided-spanish-police/
>>
>> Best,
>> Thomas
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ws2-jurisdiction mailing list
>> Ws2-jurisdiction at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction
>>
>> _______________________________________________
> Ws2-hr mailing list
> Ws2-hr at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-hr
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ws2-jurisdiction/attachments/20170920/2033a026/attachment.html>