[Ws2-so_ac] Draft transparency review for SOAC Subgroup Meeting # 18, on 26-Jan-2017

Steve DelBianco sdelbianco at netchoice.org
Thu Jan 26 01:30:46 UTC 2017


On our 19-Jan-2017 call, I offered to draft a review of one aspect of accountability — Transparency:
Steve DelBianco: Once we have described best practices, our "review" could identify AC/SOs coudl benefit from moving towards the best practices.   THAT could be our "recommendation. that is, we compare each AC/SO against the Best Practices, and not against each other
Kavouss suggests a linear approach, ie take one question at a time in our next calls and analyze the responses to test the methodology,
If we do that, let's start with an easier question, e.g. Transparency.

Attached is my 3-page draft review and recommendations for transparency of each SOAC and subgroups that provided responses.
Hope we can discuss on our next call.
—Steve

—
Steve DelBianco
Executive Director
NetChoice
http://www.NetChoice.org<http://www.netchoice.org/>
+1.703.615.6206






-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ws2-so_ac/attachments/20170126/f0db2172/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: SOAC transparency.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 77417 bytes
Desc: SOAC transparency.pdf
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ws2-so_ac/attachments/20170126/f0db2172/SOACtransparency-0001.pdf>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: SOAC transparency.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 141126 bytes
Desc: SOAC transparency.docx
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ws2-so_ac/attachments/20170126/f0db2172/SOACtransparency-0001.docx>


More information about the Ws2-so_ac mailing list