[Ws2-staff_acct] Draft SubGroup report for Hyderabad.

[Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez G.]

Thanks Avri!

example:

1. while some staff collect money from Registries for ICANN budget
2. other staff look for compliance performance of the very same 
Registries
3. and even other staff works together with the same Registries to make 
changes in the policies that affect both, fees and compliance

<Question>

Are all this functions performed by staff working at arms length form 
each other, so as to avoid conflicts???? Are each of these staff groups 
free to make their own best decisions without interference from the 
others?

What do you think?

Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez
+506 8837 7176
Skype: carlos.raulg
Current UTC offset: -6.00 (Costa Rica)
On 21 Oct 2016, at 8:02, avri doria wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Thanks for the comment.
>
> I have no clarity on what you mean by :
>
>> down to earth “organizational conditions”
>
> And what question are you suggesting?  Can you suggest text for a new
> question, either as a new question or suggest and edit to an existing
> question.
>
> thanks
>
> avri
>
> On 21-Oct-16 08:43, Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez G. wrote:
>> Thank you Avri.
>>
>> I still miss the down to earth “organizational conditions” in 
>> which
>> Staff works, and the fact that some parts or divisions of ICANN may
>> come to different conclusions of what the best interest of the whole
>> community is. ICANN has different roles and one of the areas of
>> possible conflict i still miss in the document is conflicts of
>> interested “between” those area of ICANN and how they will be 
>> solved
>> so part of the Staff does not fall into those conflicts.
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez
>> +506 8837 7176
>> Skype: carlos.raulg
>> Current UTC offset: -6.00 (Costa Rica)
>> On 21 Oct 2016, at 1:26, avri doria wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> This is coming to you at the last minute.
>>>
>>> We are required to submit a status report, according to a template, 
>>> for
>>> the Hyderabad meeting.
>>>
>>> Jordan and I have put one together.  We need to submit by end of
>>> business Friday 21 Oct  in CA headquarters time (i.e. today).
>>>
>>> The draft, open to comment, can be found in:
>>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1e-YsDmDg8lYB0Fn3oq4yUDhe8WOzgKTlg9YgVx88d_w/edit?usp=sharing
>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> A pdf is attached.
>>>
>>> I plan to finalize the report later today.
>>>
>>> thanks
>>>
>>> avri
>>>
>>> ---
>>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
>>> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Ws2-staff_acct mailing list
>>> Ws2-staff_acct at icann.org
>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-staff_acct
>>
>
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ws2-staff_acct mailing list
> Ws2-staff_acct at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-staff_acct
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ws2-staff_acct/attachments/20161021/20bf2586/attachment.html>