[Ws2-transparency] WS2 Transparency Subgroup First Draft Doc

[McAuley, David]

Thank you Michael,

I plan to remotely attend the plenary meeting Nov. 2 starting in about 12+ hours.

In case for some reason I don’t make it I suggest two modifications to the latest draft.
 
First, no change to current DIDP access to root zone or L root information should be made absent express, written buy-in by the SSAC and RSSAC. 
 
And second, non-disclosure agreements and other legitimate confidential handling obligations undertaken by ICANN for the benefit of other parties should not be made subject to overriding policy-based disclosure requirements except to the extent required by applicable law, nor should other party confidential information be disclosed if it would harm that party.  

Thank you and best regards,

David

David McAuley
International Policy Manager
Verisign Inc.
703-948-4154

-----Original Message-----
From: ws2-transparency-bounces at icann.org [mailto:ws2-transparency-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Michael Karanicolas
Sent: Monday, October 24, 2016 5:10 PM
To: Thomas Rickert (thomas at rickert.net); leonfelipe at sanchez.mx; mathieu.weill at afnic.fr
Cc: ws2-transparency at icann.org
Subject: [Ws2-transparency] WS2 Transparency Subgroup First Draft Doc

Hi all,

Please find attached a first draft of the Report from the WS2 Transparency Subgroup.

I'll note that, in each section, there are one or two "Questions raised for further consideration". These generally relate to issues that were raised by the participants in our call on Friday, and which we haven't been able to resolve yet. We aim to build these into the document as discussions move forward, hopefully with input from the broader community.

Best wishes - and we look forward to taking this conversation forward,

Michael Karanicolas