[CCWG-ACCT] work plan and next steps

Rudolph Daniel rudi.daniel at gmail.com
Fri Apr 17 13:03:46 UTC 2015


I an generally in agreement with the suggested approach.

The freeze period is I think, necessary if only to consolidate and make
good sense of all the inputs as a quality control procedure.

On Apr 16, 2015 12:57 PM, "Thomas Rickert" <thomas at rickert.net> wrote:

> All,
> this is to respond briefly to concerns that have been raised and questions
> that were asked on the mailing list.
> We had suggested during the last call that we would adjust our approach to
> make it easier for the group to work and contribute to our discussion by
> - installing a freeze period during which no updates to documents would be
> made to give the group time to go through and digest papers that have been
> produced so far
> - compiling an interim version of the report as well as an inventory of
> all documents in one place to make it easier to find all of the latest
> documents
> and
> - holding two intense work days (following the example of the CWG, which
> has conducted such intense two work days already twice.
> We intend to follow this approach as discussed during the call on Tuesday
> (see Notes and transcript here :
> https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=52895728).
> We would like to keep the momentum and work on preliminary recommendations
> so that the group get the opportunity to have an informed discussion during
> the intense work days.
> Later, we should conduct the public comment period together with executing
> an engagement plan. As some of you have mentioned, we need to get this
> right.
> Even if our group reaches consensus, we need to ensure that there
> community consensus on our recommendations. This is why - in our view - it
> is imperative that we present what we have to the community and get
> feedback from the community whether we are on the right track or whether we
> need to adjust. Getting such input and also the community’s feedback on
> potential legal implementation models is one aspect of our efforts to be as
> inclusive as possible.
> We will provide you with further information shortly.
> Kind regards,
> León, Mathieu and Thomas
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20150417/9d3038f0/attachment.html>

More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list