[CCWG-ACCT] Notes-Recordings-Transcript links for STRESS TESTS Meeting #5 - 29 April

[Jacob Malthouse]

Hi Malcolm,

Thanks for taking the time to respond. I don't think most of the measures
you identify will make a difference, but I do agree ICANN (or someone)
should be able to decide the size of the panel based on the number of cases
expected. Furthermore, a larger pool of accredited panelists would allow
the IRP to scale quickly if needed.

Unfortunately, the same solution is not available for the Board and the
reconsideration request process. That strikes me as the weakest link
currently.

Best regards,

Jacob.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20150429/2661e7b6/attachment.html>