[CCWG-ACCT] Call(s) on Thursday
nigel at channelisles.net
Thu Jul 30 08:22:05 UTC 2015
In all good will, I'm genuinely puzzled. It seems to me that you are
being either naive or disingenuous in below statement.
I refer to Chris Lahatte's statement on a procedural point that is
anything but dull.
If there is a dearth of time for review, that is exactly when the major
changes are slipped in, that are often not noticed until after its too late.
So while I will 100% accept that the below description is possible, and
even very like to be correct, running the show in this way is
procedurally unfair as it excludes oversight and does not *ensure*, in a
transparent way that nothing is being sprung on anyone.
Put another way, I have to take your (or someone else's) word for it.
> I'll close with a quite dull procedural point - the documents that you are
> not getting much time to review for these calls are generally a) making
> tiny, incremental changes from previous versions, and b) have been
> substantially the same for weeks. Nothing is being "sprung" on anyone right
More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community