[CCWG-ACCT] 4.2 Appeals Mechanisms - Reconsideration

[Izumi Okutani]

Becky,


I noticed my suggestion to reflect the same language as the IRP on Reconsideration is not reflected here.

Perhaps it wasn't obvious as it wasn't under the reconsideration thred.

 https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/52888740/28%20July%20Annotated%20Recon%20Enhancements%20Section.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1438115397000&api=v2

It may be too late to be reflected considering the freezing time - if that's the case would you please confirm that it will be reflected in the final proposal for the submission.


Thanks,
Izumi


My comment to WP2 list: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/wp2/2015-July/000379.html

CURRENT:
In case of including the global number resources policy in its scope, further considerations
should be made of its implications. The bottom up policy development process and its
forum for the number resources is outside the ICANN, even though the ICANN Board
approves its global policies, and the same mechanisms as the names related policies may
not be applicable.

SUGGESTED: (suggested earlier to WP2- the same language as IRP)
Disputes related to Internet number resources are out of scope of the IRP.