[CCWG-ACCT] SIDE BY SIDE on Regulation/Contract language
Mueller, Milton L
milton at gatech.edu
Tue Nov 17 18:35:15 UTC 2015
I am fine with replacing "covered by" the RAA/RA with "provided by parties to" the RAA/RA as Malcolm suggests below
--MM
> -----Original Message-----
> I'm afraid "covered by" is unacceptably broad; it could be read as including
> anything mentioned within those contracts, which woud enable those that
> agree such contracts to defeat the previous clause.
>
> I am not clear on the underlying rationale, but I am guessing that the RA/RAA
> contracts may impose requirements on the information services (e.g. web
> sites) provided by Registries and Registrars, and so a carve-out is needed so
> that this may continue. If this understanding is correct, I would suggest
>
> "other than information services provided by parties to
> the Registrar Accreditation Agreement (RAA) or the Registry
> Agreement (RA)"
>
> I hope that helps.
>
More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community
mailing list