[CCWG-ACCT] SIDE BY SIDE on Regulation/Contract language

[Mueller, Milton L]

I am fine with replacing "covered by" the RAA/RA with "provided by parties to" the RAA/RA  as Malcolm suggests below
--MM

> -----Original Message-----
> I'm afraid "covered by" is unacceptably broad; it could be read as including
> anything mentioned within those contracts, which woud enable those that
> agree such contracts to defeat the previous clause.
> 
> I am not clear on the underlying rationale, but I am guessing that the RA/RAA
> contracts may impose requirements on the information services (e.g. web
> sites) provided by Registries and Registrars, and so a carve-out is needed so
> that this may continue. If this understanding is correct, I would suggest
> 
>        "other than information services provided by parties to
>        the Registrar Accreditation Agreement (RAA) or the Registry
>        Agreement (RA)"
> 
> I hope that helps.
>