[CCWG-ACCT] Update on Board discussions on the CCWG Update

[Malcolm Hutty]

> On 25 Nov 2015, at 22:01, Bruce Tonkin <Bruce.Tonkin at melbourneit.com.au> wrote:
> 
> The point of the Board's comment was to help establish expected behaviour in advance, and then be able to take advantage of that clear expectation when establishing a rationale for the community to consider.  It was not meant to be a limitation on the rationale that could be  written, or the ability of the community to remove a director.

Thank you Bruce, that is very helpful. The Board's rationale is not always at all clear and it is too often difficult to understand reasoning other than sheer opposition even when the existence of such reasoning is asserted. This gives, in this case at least, a clear basis that might not have been obvious. Much appreciated. 

Malcolm.