[CCWG-ACCT] A path to Dublin and beyond

[Jonathan Zuck]

We have ALWAYS described WS1 as the first step in a longer process of continuous improvement. Nothing nefarious there.

Sent from my Windows Phone
________________________________
From: Alan Greenberg<mailto:alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca>
Sent: ‎10/‎4/‎2015 7:28 PM
To: Jordan Carter<mailto:jordan at internetnz.net.nz>
Cc: Accountability Cross Community<mailto:accountability-cross-community at icann.org>
Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] A path to Dublin and beyond

One could  interpret such a position in a more nefarious way.
Specifically, "We are presenting this proposal to you because we
think you will like it. As soon as you accept it and the transition
happens, we will change it all to something we didn't think you would
have liked."

Clearly not a strategy for success.

Alan

At 04/10/2015 06:01 PM, Jordan Carter wrote:

>If I was a decision-maker on this proposal - either the ICANN Board,
>NTIA or indeed the Congress itself, or even an ICANN SO or AC - I
>would be very uncomfortable at anything which suggested "we will
>reevaluate the model after the transition, because we aren't sure
>this is a durable accountability settlement".

_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20151004/e80b12ba/attachment.html>