[CCWG-ACCT] The 60 percent solution

Cheryl Langdon-Orr langdonorr at gmail.com
Mon Feb 1 00:31:38 UTC 2016


That would indeed be desirable Keith...
On 1 Feb 2016 11:30, "Drazek, Keith" <kdrazek at verisign.com> wrote:

> Thanks to Kavouss for this suggestion, and to Greg for highlighting it. I
> hope we can all consider this as a possible further compromise solution
> that might bring us to resolution. I know we are all committed to the
> successful completion of our work in a timely manner. Let's not miss this
> opportunity to reach consensus and finish our work in a collaborative
> manner.
>
> Regards to all.
> Keith
>
>
> On Jan 31, 2016, at 6:49 PM, Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> All,
>
> I wanted to pluck this suggestion out of the email swamp.
>
> Kavouss made an alternative proposal concerning another threshold between
> Simple Majority and 2/3 -- the alternative threshold is 60%.
>
> Speaking only for myself, this could be a simple but creative way out of
> the current situation.  It is a literally a middle ground between the
> current majority threshold and the previously proposed 2/3 threshold:
>
> *Votes*
>
> *Percentage*
>
> *Result*
>
> 8/16
>
> 50%
>
> No
>
> 9/16
>
> 56.25%
>
> Yes, by majority
>
> 10/16
>
> 62.50%
>
> Yes, if by 60%
>
> 11/16
>
> 68.75%
>
> Yes, if by 2/3
>
> This would require one more vote than the current threshold and one less
> vote than the 2/3 threshold.  Win/win?
>
> Greg
>
> On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 5:41 AM, Kavouss Arasteh <
> kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Dear Co-Chairs
>> Pls kindly confirm that you have received my last alternative proposal
>> concerning another threshold between Simple Majority and 2/3. This
>> alternative threshould is *60%*
>> *There has been many cases considered with that level of threshold*
>> *Pls confirm its recption and confirm actions to be taken before you go
>> to poll*
>> *Awaiting for your reply*
>> *Kavouss *
>>
>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20160201/00ca9476/attachment.html>


More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list