[CCWG-ACCT] The 60 percent solution

Dr Eberhard W Lisse epilisse at gmail.com
Tue Feb 2 04:50:39 UTC 2016


Let's just poll on the 2/3 then this morning...

el

-- 
Sent from Dr Lisse's iPad mini 4

> On 2 Feb 2016, at 02:00, Andrew Sullivan <ajs at anvilwalrusden.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
>> On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 09:41:07PM +0000, Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch wrote:
>> 
>> I guess other GAC colleagues may confirm that the 2/3 were part of a package deal agreed in Dublin by consensus. A package deal which contained other elements different to the 2/3.
> 
> Do you know of somewhere this agreement was communicated?  I do not
> recall an agreement in the CCWG about such a package; what I recall is
> a lot of discussion about the idea, and I'm unable to find a consensus
> determination to this effect in the CCWG materials.  Similarly, it
> doesn't seem to be (as Greg outlined and as I noticed the other day)
> in the GAC communiqué from Dublin.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> A
> 
> -- 
> Andrew Sullivan
> ajs at anvilwalrusden.com
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community


More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list