[CCWG-ACCT] Clarification of the 60% for Board Rejection of GAC Consensus Advice

Dr Eberhard W Lisse el at lisse.NA
Tue Feb 2 08:49:59 UTC 2016


Right,

so they could not chicken out and at least have to abstain.

Makes sense.

el

On 2016-02-02 10:47, Nigel Roberts wrote:
> NO
> 
> It means 60% of those Board members entitled to vote, present and
> actually voting.
> 
> 
> On 02/02/16 08:45, Dr Eberhard W Lisse wrote:
>> Just so to be sure
>>
>> 60% means 60% of those Board Members entitled to vote, currently 10.8
>> (11) of 18, right? In other words not 12.6 (13) of 21.
>>
>> greetings, el
>>
>>

-- 
Dr. Eberhard W. Lisse  \        / Obstetrician & Gynaecologist (Saar)
el at lisse.NA            / *     |   Telephone: +264 81 124 6733 (cell)
PO Box 8421             \     /
Bachbrecht, Namibia     ;____/


More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list