[CCWG-ACCT] Clarification of the 60% for Board Rejection of GAC Consensus Advice
Dr Eberhard W Lisse
el at lisse.NA
Tue Feb 2 08:51:31 UTC 2016
I would also allow for Paper Ballot by absent members.
On 2016-02-02 10:49, Dr Eberhard W Lisse wrote:
> so they could not chicken out and at least have to abstain.
> Makes sense.
> On 2016-02-02 10:47, Nigel Roberts wrote:
>> It means 60% of those Board members entitled to vote, present and
>> actually voting.
>> On 02/02/16 08:45, Dr Eberhard W Lisse wrote:
>>> Just so to be sure
>>> 60% means 60% of those Board Members entitled to vote, currently 10.8
>>> (11) of 18, right? In other words not 12.6 (13) of 21.
>>> greetings, el
Dr. Eberhard W. Lisse \ / Obstetrician & Gynaecologist (Saar)
el at lisse.NA / * | Telephone: +264 81 124 6733 (cell)
PO Box 8421 \ /
Bachbrecht, Namibia ;____/
More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community