[CCWG-ACCT] Fwd: Timing and agenda Thursday's call and options to be discussed?

[Mark Carvell]

Dear Jorge and Kavouss

As you may recall, there was this very helpful response from Thomas when I
raised this question in the chat during CCWG meeting 82:

*Mark Carvell  GAC - UK Govt: (01:40) REC 11  Sorry to go back to previous
agenda item 2 on Rec 11. Can you confirm that the upcoming focus issue
call(s) will consider only the two proposals by Becky and Kavouss and that
no WHOLLY  new propoal will be considered. I think it is imporrtant to make
this clear if we are to achieve closure by next week - which everyone wants
I'm sure!*

*  Thomas Rickert, CCWG Co-Chair: (01:41) Mark, we do not have indications
for other proposals than those from Kavouss and Becky.*

*  jorge cancio (GAC Switzerland): (01:41) +1 Mark*.

Kind regards

Mark

Mark Carvell
​United Kingdom Representative on the Governmental Advisory Committee of
ICANN​

Global Internet Governance Policy
Department for Culture, Media and Sport
mark.carvell at culture.gov.uk
tel +44 (0) 20 7211 6062

On 3 February 2016 at 09:16, Kavouss Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Dear Jorge
> Yes I agree with you.
> If these two devoted calls are opened to new or old multiple proposals we
> will get no results
> The Co-Chairs need to clarify the matter
> Regards
> Kavouss
>
>
> 2016-02-03 10:10 GMT+01:00 <Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch>:
>
>> Dear Kavouss
>>
>>
>>
>> I fully understand your point.
>>
>>
>>
>> The more reason that the co-chairs should clarify what will be discussed
>> exactly on the Thursday and Monday calls.
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards
>>
>>
>>
>> Jorge
>>
>>
>>
>> *Von:* Kavouss Arasteh [mailto:kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com]
>> *Gesendet:* Mittwoch, 3. Februar 2016 10:07
>> *An:* Cancio Jorge BAKOM <Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch>
>> *Cc:* Thomas Rickert <thomas at rickert.net>; Mathieu Weill <
>> mathieu.weill at afnic.fr>; León Felipe Sánchez Ambía <leonfelipe at sanchez.mx>;
>> accountability-cross-community at icann.org
>> *Betreff:* Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Fwd: Timing and agenda Thursday's call and
>> options to be discussed?
>>
>>
>>
>> Dear Jorge,
>>
>> Thank you for your message.
>>
>> You may have noted that,* as participant to CCWGat call 81.*I made a
>> compromise proposal,strictly limited to two option in Annex 11 of Rec
>> 11,NAMELY 2/3  AND SIMPLE MAJORITY, witzh a view to get out of dreadlocks.
>>
>> Later on I have noted that after Beckie made her proposal in regard with
>> Rec.1 ( disabling GAC  in regard with exercising its community power, in
>> case that other community innvoked IRP regading Board's action with respect
>> to GAC advice, claiming 8 alleging that the Board's actions exceeded it
>> mission,
>>
>> Surprisingly I have noted that those 5 persons  very offen speaking  of
>> the need to exclude GAC TO EXERCISE ANY POWER AND ARE PARTISANS OF st 18
>> AND 50% SIMPLE MAJORITY FOR GAC ADVICE, ATTEMPTING TO COMBINE bECJKIE'S
>> SO-XALLED "INNOVATIVE PROPOSAL "WITH 60% .
>>
>> Last night I formally withdrew that proposal which I made as *CCWG
>> PARTICIPANT.*
>>
>> *Consequently, no proposal should be associated to me in that regard*
>>
>> *Best wishes*
>>
>> *Kavouss *
>>
>>
>>
>> 2016-02-03 7:01 GMT+01:00 <Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch>:
>>
>> Hello co-chairs
>>
>> Could you please respond to the email below?
>>
>> Consultations in our constituencies are quite difficult whithout a clear
>> process and timeline and agenda from your side.
>>
>> Please answer this in full and do not point to general information:
>>
>>
>> We would also be grateful for an agenda, including a clear identification
>> (and the text) of the options to be discussed, as was requested during this
>> morning's call in the chat.
>>
>> thanks and regards
>>
>> Jorge
>>
>> Von meinem iPhone gesendet
>>
>> Anfang der weitergeleiteten E‑Mail:
>>
>> Von: <Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch<mailto:Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch>>
>> Datum: 2. Februar 2016 um 18:51:55 MEZ
>> An: "accountability-cross-community at icann.org<mailto:
>> accountability-cross-community at icann.org>" <
>> accountability-cross-community at icann.org<mailto:
>> accountability-cross-community at icann.org>>
>> Betreff: Timing and agenda Thursday's call and options to be discussed?
>>
>>
>> Dear co-chairs and staff
>>
>> Have you already sent the invites for the call on Thursday?
>>
>> We would also be grateful for an agenda, including a clear identification
>> (and the text) of the options to be discussed, as was requested during this
>> morning's call in the chat.
>>
>> Thanks and regards
>>
>> Jorge
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20160203/7d73d52c/attachment.html>