[CCWG-ACCT] Board comments on Recommendation 6 - Human Rights
nigel at channelisles.net
Thu Feb 4 12:03:31 UTC 2016
Trust me, that is exactly what it it says. It says, "ICANN will respect
the law, but will do no more".
Under the proposed wording, it is perfectly legal for ICANN to adopting
binding policies that require property rights to override free
expression rights in every case. There is no applicable law that
I can see where the discontinuity is here. You are conflating the
requirement to follow domestic law, with a committment to respect human
rights. You are just afraid that someone will one day ask ICANN to
honour such a committment, and you want to be able to fall back on
"well, we only follow California law".
The law against murder is not a law requiring ICANN to respect the right
to life. The law against murder is a State respecting the right to life,
not ICANN. The same for any other laws that apply to ICANN.
It's entirely otiose to say "ICANN will follow the law". That's inherent
in ICANN's incorporation and structure.
In the UK there is a fairly detailed legal provision that sets out out
human rights obligations work (the Human Rights Act 1998 which I studied
in detail in law school).
Yet even there it is clear from the statute that human rights
obligations does not apply to private companies unless they adopt them
The wording chosen, on a strict construction, EXCLUDES all human rights
obligations -- it does not adopt any at all.
If you don't believe me, let's ask Mrs Clooney for her opinion.
On 04/02/16 09:02, Bruce Tonkin wrote:
> Hello Nigel,
>>> and clearly says "human rights are NOT part of our core values".
> I don't think that is quite right.
> Applicable law actually covers some human rights (e.g. slavery, torture) - it just may not cover all the human rights that you would like to be considered by ICANN.
> There are some human rights that clearly don't apply to ICANN - ie we don't have arrest powers so arbitrary arrest clearly doesn't apply, nor do we charge people with penal offences, or confer nationality on people.
> It is determining the relevant human rights that should apply to ICANN beyond the basic set that is in applicable law that is the subject for work stream 2.
> Bruce Tonkin
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community