[CCWG-ACCT] Aresteh proposal to resolve Recommendation 1 and 11 issu

[Kavouss Arasteh]

Dear James,
Certainly I agree with you that we should not rush.
However, you very rightly said
*"Please allow our lawyers do prepare what they are able to do for the call
and Im sure that formal written opinion will come when it is available.*
*Also recognise that this is the weekend and full teams may not be
available"*
.That is a valid approach which was missing in Holly's mail and you did
kindly pick it up for which I am grateful to you.
Yr statement is very valid and logique
Kavouss

2016-02-07 15:33 GMT+01:00 James Gannon <james at cyberinvasion.net>:

> Legal analysis cannot be rushed or it is of no value to any of us.
> Please allow our lawyers do prepare what they are able to do for the call
> and Im sure that formal written opinion will come when it is available.
> Also recognise that this is the weekend and full teams may not be
> available.
>
> -james
>
> From: <accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of
> Kavouss Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com>
> Date: Sunday 7 February 2016 at 2:19 p.m.
> To: "Gregory, Holly" <holly.gregory at sidley.com>
> Cc: "ICANN at adlercolvin.com" <ICANN at adlercolvin.com>, Thomas Rickert <
> thomas at rickert.net>, Accountability Cross Community <
> accountability-cross-community at icann.org>, ACCT-Staff <
> acct-staff at icann.org>, Sidley ICANN CCWG <sidleyicannccwg at sidley.com>
> Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Aresteh proposal to resolve Recommendation 1 and
> 11 issu
>
> Dear Holly,
> Thank you very much.
> But the issue is too delicate, complex and sensitive.
> We do not accept only verbal explanation
> as said by you
> Quote
> *" we will try to be prepared to address on the call."*
> *Unquote*
> We need a memo describing t various aspects of the matter.
> Pls kindly parepare a MEMO
> i HEREBY REQUEST THE cO-Chair to urge our legal Council to prepare a
> formal MEMO.
> Failure to do so, considerable delay may  be caused.to the entire process.
> GAC MEMBERS WOULD CERTAINLY NOT HAPPY FOR ANY VERBAL EXPLANATION AND
> PERHAPS gnso too
> Regards
> Kavouss
>
>
> 2016-02-07 14:46 GMT+01:00 Gregory, Holly <holly.gregory at sidley.com>:
>
>> Hi Thomas, we will try to be prepared to address on the call.  Holly
>>
>>
>>
>> Sent with Good (www.good.com)
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> *From:* Thomas Rickert
>> *Sent:* Saturday, February 06, 2016 03:03:45 PM
>> *To:* Rosemary E. Fei; Gregory, Holly; Sidley ICANN CCWG;
>> ICANN at adlercolvin.com
>> *Cc:* León Felipe Sánchez Ambía; Mathieu Weill; ACCT-Staff;
>> Accountability Cross Community
>> *Subject:* Fwd: [CCWG-ACCT] Aresteh proposal to resolve Recommendation 1
>> and 11 issu
>>
>> Dear Rosemary and Holly,
>> This is to certify the review of the questions in the e-mail below. We do
>> know this is extremely short notice, but it would be great if the answers
>> could inform our discussion on this very topic next Monday, February 8th,
>> 12.00 UTC. We do appreciate that time is too short for a written memo, but
>> maybe one of you or team could offer initial answers during the call.
>>
>> I hope to be correct in assuming that you have seen the compromise
>> proposal under consideration with input primarily from Kavouss and Becky.
>> Also, you may find Rafael's previous questions and the answers offered by
>> Becky informative. Should these not be known, please send a note to staff
>> so they can forward them to you.
>>
>> Thank you very much.
>>
>> Kind regards,
>> Thomas
>>
>> ---
>> rickert.net
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__rickert.net&d=CwMFaQ&c=Od00qP2XTg0tXf_H69-T2w&r=AKn_gzAS4ANpCEqx2GjPwjUkqYPHaN7m0NQNyfQXAgk&m=2VntNON2N-hgYmty4_4QIqVgiZeRrHKjrgphT3EAyW4&s=kiNCMtKfY_G6S-Qgf_Ze05oQGPlo7GeaNSrd6DUERI0&e=>
>>
>>
>> Anfang der weitergeleiteten E‑Mail:
>>
>> *Von:* "Perez Galindo, Rafael" <RPEREZGA at minetur.es>
>> *Datum:* 6. Februar 2016 um 11:32:55 MEZ
>> *An:* James Gannon <james at cyberinvasion.net>, "
>> Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch" <Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch>, "
>> kdrazek at verisign.com" <kdrazek at verisign.com>
>> *Kopie:* "thomas at rickert.net" <thomas at rickert.net>, "
>> accountability-cross-community at icann.org" <
>> accountability-cross-community at icann.org>
>> *Betreff:* *RE: [CCWG-ACCT] Aresteh proposal to resolve Recommendation 1
>> and 11 issues*
>>
>> Dear Co-chairs,
>>
>> Det me draw your attention to the latest developments in the discussions
>> regarding Rec 11 (former ST 18), namely the carve-out system put forward by
>> Becky and backed by the GNSO.
>>
>> While thanking Becky for this proposal, I believe we can all agree to
>> acknowledge that the carve-out is not a mere adjustment, nor a tweak to
>> complete or shape a package of measures, but it constitutes a major
>> essential change, for it actually regulates the functioning of the EC with
>> regards to the GAC, and could raise important political and legal concerns.
>>
>> Hence, and prior to any possible endorsement, I kindly ask that a
>> detailed legal analisys of the proposed text be commissioned to the Legal
>> assistance by the Co-Chairs:
>>
>> - who would decide whether the carve-out is applicable to a certain issue
>> to be subject to a community decision
>>
>> - according to what standard would that decision be taken? For instance:
>> is it enough if Board mentions GAC Advice in its rationale as a source for
>> its decision. Or would a substantial test be applied, i.e. checked whether
>> the Board decision follows GAC Advice? In the latter case, would the
>> carve-out also apply if the GAC Advice is only partially followed?
>>
>> - what means of redress would be available for any party not in agreement
>> with such a decision?
>>
>> - would the GAC, according to this wording, be able to participate fully
>> in the decision-making of the community mechanism on the following topics?:
>>
>> 1. Any Board decision on policies or implementation of delegation and
>> redelegation of ccTLDs, which would be taken. having regard, among others,
>> general standing advice on the matter. There is standing Advice from the
>> GAC on such issues (e.g. GAC principles on delegation and redelegation of
>> ccTLDs)
>>
>> 2. Any Board decision on policy or implementation of new gTLDs, which
>> would also take into consideration, among others, general standing advice
>> on the matter. There is standing Advice from the GAC on such issues (e.g.
>> GAC principles on new gTLDs)
>>
>>
>> Thank you and best regards
>>
>> Rafael
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ________________________________________
>> From: accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org [
>> accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org] on behalf of James
>> Gannon [james at cyberinvasion.net]
>> Sent: 05 February 2016 21:15
>> To: Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch; kdrazek at verisign.com
>> Cc: thomas at rickert.net; accountability-cross-community at icann.org
>> Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Aresteh proposal to resolve Recommendation 1 and
>> 11 issues
>>
>> Jorge,
>> I think at this point the GAC needs to go back and consider the
>> proposition that is on the table the the GNSO appears to be in a position
>> to support.
>>
>> We do not have the timelines available to us to continue to argue over
>> this, the GNSO has come to rough support on a position now, I feel its time
>> for the GAC to go back to its own processes with this proposition to
>> evaluate it. We are all aware of the GACs wants in this, but that does not
>> mean that the GNSO community will agree to them as we have laid out in our
>> comments to the 3rd Draft proposal.
>>
>> I feel that if we keep going around in circles over what the GNSO and GAC
>> are potentially able to negotiate we will never end this process, and I
>> think we all want to attempt to bring this to a close ASAP. I hope that the
>> GAC can continue to show its flexibility and ability to compromise and work
>> together with the broad community on this, no-one is setting out to
>> disenfranchise any stakeholder group here, we are all trying to make this
>> the least bad solution that we can all agree on. On this point no-one is
>> winning and no-one is losing.
>>
>> -James
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 05/02/2016, 8:03 p.m., "
>> accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org on behalf of
>> Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch" <
>> accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org on behalf of
>> Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch> wrote:
>>
>> Dear Keith
>>
>>
>> Thank you very much for this full text of the gnso input.
>>
>>
>> I'm aware if the concerns expressed by the gnso, and as I have said
>> several times, I consider them legitimate and relevant, although we may
>> have different opinions on their degree of impact or the means to address
>> them.
>>
>>
>> At the same time we all know that the GAC came a long way to reach a
>> consensus input on the then ST18, now rec11. And such difficulties were
>> based on concerns from a relevant number of governments whose concerns I
>> feel we should also consider legitimate and worth consideration.
>>
>>
>> Rec11 was then based on a compromise, which still raised concerns from
>> sectors of the gnso and from a number of governments.
>>
>>
>> I think the solution is not to privilege parts of the community in
>> reaching a solution.
>>
>>
>> We need to take on board as many stakeholders and constituencies as
>> possible.
>>
>>
>> In the last weeks we agreed, we all agreed, to take up important points
>> made by the gnso on rec11: clarify that the Board has no new obligations,
>> the obligation of a clear rationale, the clarification that Board decisions
>> always have to be consistent with Bylaws, irrespective of the source of the
>> advice on which such a decision is based.
>>
>>
>> On rec10 we also made additions to address concerns expressed around the
>> accountability review of the GAC.
>>
>>
>> And again on rec11 -as I also said- I felt that Becky's initial proposal
>> (at least as some of us understood it) was one possible means. And I think
>> that if we narrow it down to the community IRP it could work.
>>
>>
>> But to word it in such broad terms as it is now has the effect I have
>> repeatedly described. Our lawyers could analyze the scooe of such an
>> exception and advise us.
>>
>>
>> If we agree that the GAC is a legitimate participant in the community
>> mechanism, as we habe repeatedly and consistently agreed, then we cannot
>> favour an overbroad carve-out, because the GAC would not be able to
>> participate on an equal footing in the community mechanism.
>>
>>
>> In such case we need to clarify and word the carve-out in such terms that
>> it is clear that we just want a very narrow carve-out and that this will
>> not prevent the GAC from normally participating in the community mechanism,
>> with a few exceptions.
>>
>>
>> If the intention is to have a broad carve-out, then we would not be able
>> to agree.
>>
>>
>> But I hope that we are in the first case.
>>
>>
>> best
>>
>>
>> Jorge
>>
>>
>> Von meinem iPhone gesendet
>>
>>
>> Am 05.02.2016 um 20:40 schrieb Drazek, Keith <kdrazek at verisign.com>:
>>
>>
>> Thanks Jorge,
>>
>>
>> A majority of the GNSO's constituent groups view the combination of
>> Rec-1, Rec-10 and Rec-11 as "interlinked." The majority of GNSO groups
>> (sufficient to reject) view ANY change of Board voting threshold for GAC
>> consensus advice to be highly problematic. The GNSO's willingness to
>> consider and accept Kavouss' suggested compromise of 60% is entirely
>> dependent upon the further clarifications suggested by Becky in the
>> Arasteh/Burr proposal.
>>
>>
>> I've attached the GNSO Council comments, which are a summary of the GNSO
>> groups comments, for your further review. Here are the relevant texts:
>>
>>
>> From the GNSO Comments on Rec-1:
>>
>>
>>   "Some in the GNSO have identified a clear link with Recommendations #10
>> & #11 and are of the view that the current balance between SO/ACs needs to
>> be preserved in the Empowered Community,    especially with respect to the
>> GAC." [This means the status quo should be maintained -- the GAC should
>> remain advisory and not have a decisional role.]
>>
>>
>> From the GNSO Comment on Rec-10:
>>
>>
>>   "There are some concerns within the GNSO with the top down nature of
>> accountability reviews, and the exemption of the GAC from this community
>> requirement. It is also troubling that the GAC, further    empowered if
>> Recommendations #1 and #11 are adopted, would be exempted from the same
>> periodic reviews as the other SO/ACs. All participants in the Community
>> Mechanism should be subject to    equivalent accountability reviews."
>>
>>
>> From the GNSO Comment on Rec-11:
>>
>>
>>   "There is broad opposition to this recommendation as written. Most
>> SG/Cs do not support the proposal to raise the threshold for a Board vote
>> to reject GAC advice. All expressed serious concerns over the
>>
>>   lack of specificity in the recommendation in relation to the
>> requirements for GAC advice (such as the provision of rationale) and the
>> possibility that this recommendation, if adopted, could unduly change
>>    the nature of the Board-GAC relationship and/or the position of the GAC
>> vis-à-vis other SO/ACs. Several SG/Cs also believe that any CCWG
>> recommendation on this topic should retain the current flexibility    in
>> the Bylaws where the Board is not required to undertake a formal vote in
>> order to reject GAC advice."
>>
>>
>>   "IPC, NCSG and the Registrars SG expressly objected to changing and
>> specifying the threshold for Board action; the Registries SG and ISPCP
>> Constituency did not object expressly but highlighted significant
>>    concerns about the implications of such a change. The Registries SG
>> stated it was unlikely to support the 2/3 threshold for Board action unless
>> three additional requirements (provision of a rationale,        consistency
>> with ICANN bylaws and within GAC scope, and defined consensus) applied to
>> such GAC Advice. While BC and NPOC supported the change, both nevertheless
>> also noted concerns over the    implications, with the BC's support
>> expressly conditioned upon certain qualifications being made to the
>> proposal."
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Keith
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>>
>> From: Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch [mailto:Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch
>> <Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch>]
>>
>> Sent: Friday, February 05, 2016 2:16 PM
>>
>> To: Drazek, Keith
>>
>> Cc: RPEREZGA at minetur.es; jbladel at godaddy.com; thomas at rickert.net;
>> accountability-cross-community at icann.org
>>
>> Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Aresteh proposal to resolve Recommendation 1 and
>> 11 issues
>>
>>
>> Dear Keith
>>
>>
>> I thought that the gnso council had supported recs 1&2. But I may have a
>> bad memory and you may point to different gnso statements?
>>
>>
>> The "limited support and strong opposition" was on rec11, right?
>>
>>
>> Best
>>
>>
>> Jorge
>>
>>
>> Von meinem iPhone gesendet
>>
>>
>> Am 05.02.2016 um 20:12 schrieb Drazek, Keith <kdrazek at verisign.com>:
>>
>>
>> Dear Jorge,
>>
>>
>> Actually, what we have on the table is the 3rd draft report AND the
>> public comments submitted, including comments from the Chartering
>> Organizations.
>>
>>
>> The public comments and discussions in the GNSO made clear that the 3rd
>> draft report was not acceptable as written. The CCWG is now working to
>> ensure that no Chartering Organization will oppose or reject the final
>> report, or any of its 12 recommendations. Based on our recent discussions,
>> this is what I believe the Arasteh/Burr proposal will deliver, and it does
>> not appear to me that any Chartering Organization will formally oppose it.
>>
>>
>> If anyone believes their Chartering Organization will reach consensus to
>> object to the current proposal, now is the time to say so. We are at the
>> 11th hour and 57th minute.
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Keith
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>>
>> From: Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch [mailto:Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch
>> <Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch>]
>>
>> Sent: Friday, February 05, 2016 1:57 PM
>>
>> To: Drazek, Keith
>>
>> Cc: RPEREZGA at minetur.es; jbladel at godaddy.com; thomas at rickert.net;
>>
>> accountability-cross-community at icann.org
>>
>> Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Aresteh proposal to resolve Recommendation 1
>>
>> and 11 issues
>>
>>
>> Dear Keith
>>
>>
>> This is an interesting question.
>>
>>
>> But what we have on the table is the third draft report.
>>
>>
>> This proposal is being discussed in the ccwg -with a view to achieve a
>>
>> higher degree of consensus- but it does not seem the improve the
>>
>> consensus level - although there might be some vocal support from some
>>
>> gnso members (who have proposed this)
>>
>>
>> best
>>
>>
>> Jorge
>>
>>
>> Von meinem iPhone gesendet
>>
>>
>> Am 05.02.2016 um 19:36 schrieb Drazek, Keith <kdrazek at verisign.com<
>> mailto:kdrazek at verisign.com <kdrazek at verisign.com>>>:
>>
>>
>> We should remember that the CCWG proposal will move forward if there is
>> no formal objection from the Chartering Organizations. As such, the better
>> question is, "Will any Chartering Organization reach consensus to object to
>> the Arasteh/Burr proposal, or to the CCWG proposal as a whole?" Based on
>> our discussions of the last several days, it appears to me that the
>> Chartering Organizations may support or remain silent.  Multiple GAC
>> members have expressed a willingness to consider/accept the compromise as
>> clarified by Becky's emails. If the GAC can't reach a consensus position
>> either way, it will not formally oppose as a Chartering Organization. Will
>> the GAC reach consensus to object?
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Keith
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> From: Perez Galindo, Rafael [mailto:RPEREZGA at minetur.es
>> <RPEREZGA at minetur.es>]
>>
>> Sent: Friday, February 05, 2016 12:54 PM
>>
>> To: James M. Bladel;
>>
>> Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch<mailto:Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch
>> <Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch>>;
>>
>> Drazek, Keith
>>
>> Cc: thomas at rickert.net<mailto:thomas at rickert.net <thomas at rickert.net>>;
>>
>> accountability-cross-community at icann.org<mailto:accountability-cross-c
>>
>> ommunity at icann.org>
>>
>> Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Aresteh proposal to resolve Recommendation 1
>>
>> and 11 issues
>>
>>
>> It is always difficult to make predictions, James, but taking into
>> account that the 3rd draft proposal did not get support from many in the
>> GAC, one could assume that this new package containing an extremely high
>> sensitive adding, namely the "expanded carve out" system that in practice
>> would exclude the GAC from participating in the EC in almost all cases,
>> will not get much traction either.
>>
>>
>> Best
>>
>> Rafael
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Sent from a mobile device. Please excuse any typos.
>>
>>
>> -------- Original message --------
>>
>> From: "James M. Bladel"
>>
>> Date:05/02/2016 18:25 (GMT+01:00)
>>
>> To: Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch<mailto:Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch
>> <Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch>>,
>>
>> kdrazek at verisign.com<mailto:kdrazek at verisign.com <kdrazek at verisign.com>>
>>
>> Cc: thomas at rickert.net<mailto:thomas at rickert.net <thomas at rickert.net>>,
>>
>> accountability-cross-community at icann.org<mailto:accountability-cross-c
>>
>> ommunity at icann.org>
>>
>> Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Aresteh proposal to resolve Recommendation 1
>>
>> and 11 issues
>>
>>
>> Hello Jorge -
>>
>>
>> Do you believe this position is widely held in the GAC?
>>
>>
>> Thanks-
>>
>>
>> J.
>>
>>
>>
>> On 2/5/16, 11:06 , "accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org on
>> behalf of Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch<
>> mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org
>> <accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org>%20on%0bbehalf%20of%
>> 20Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch>"
>>
>> <accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org on behalf of
>> Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch<
>> mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org
>> <accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org>%20on%20behalf%20of%
>> 0bJorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> A rise in 10% on the voting threshold in exchange for a
>>
>> discriminatory and overbroad exclusion. Sounds like a weird deal and
>>
>> little of a serious compromise
>>
>>
>> best
>>
>>
>> Jorge
>>
>>
>> Von meinem iPhone gesendet
>>
>>
>> Am 05.02.2016 um 18:01 schrieb Drazek, Keith
>>
>> <kdrazek at verisign.com<mailto:kdrazek at verisign.com <kdrazek at verisign.com><
>> mailto:kdrazek at verisign.com <kdrazek at verisign.com>%3cmailto:kdrazek@
>> <kdrazek@>verisign.com
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__verisign.com&d=CwMFaQ&c=Od00qP2XTg0tXf_H69-T2w&r=AKn_gzAS4ANpCEqx2GjPwjUkqYPHaN7m0NQNyfQXAgk&m=2VntNON2N-hgYmty4_4QIqVgiZeRrHKjrgphT3EAyW4&s=x-VQJVnOKEttRNXDaGtjg0qBUkOPFRCcWRuO7Pchyco&e=>
>> >>>:
>>
>>
>> The Arasteh/Burr proposal does not disenfranchise anyone. It gives
>>
>> the GAC more than it has today in requiring a higher Board threshold
>>
>> to reject consensus GAC advice. The current proposal creates
>>
>> appropriate checks and balances, and it's likely to be the only way
>>
>> forward to a successful and timely resolution of Rec-1 and Rec-11.
>>
>> Let's not undo the progress we've collectively made over the last several
>> days.
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Keith
>>
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>>
>> On Feb 5, 2016, at 11:47 AM, Seun Ojedeji
>>
>> <seun.ojedeji at gmail.com<mailto:seun.ojedeji at gmail.com
>> <seun.ojedeji at gmail.com><mailto:seun.ojedeji at gmail.com
>> <seun.ojedeji at gmail.com>%3cmailto:seun.ojedeji@ <seun.ojedeji@>gmail.com
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gmail.com&d=CwMFaQ&c=Od00qP2XTg0tXf_H69-T2w&r=AKn_gzAS4ANpCEqx2GjPwjUkqYPHaN7m0NQNyfQXAgk&m=2VntNON2N-hgYmty4_4QIqVgiZeRrHKjrgphT3EAyW4&s=UmPkKYwhHfx6pw_GQWWzAlA9kUvy2SRRKkqprAmO5BQ&e=>>>>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi Paul,
>>
>>
>> You say this as if you already know the outcome of the vote ;-).
>>
>> While I am not a member of this working group and so have no voting
>>
>> right, I will say that adequate care should be taken here.
>>
>>
>> I don't think the intent should be to disenfranchise any part of the
>>
>> community; Yes there has been perceived higher power that GAC has and
>>
>> that is what is being fixed, and such fix should put them at same
>>
>> level with other part of the community as much as possible.
>>
>>
>> As a typical end user who lacks adequate resources (who to some
>>
>> extent would rely/hope on GAC's ability to defend my right in certain
>>
>> situation). I don't think I would support any process that does not
>>
>> give a fair play ground and anyone that reduces the decision making
>>
>> power of GAC below that of other participating SO/AC.
>>
>>
>> I don't think it is right for other parts of the community to veto
>>
>> GAC's "consensus" advice that has not achieved some combination of
>>
>> the
>>
>> following:
>>
>>
>> 1. Rejected by board
>>
>> 2. Determined by board to be out of its mission and/OR determined by
>>
>> an IRP to be out of ICANN's mission.
>>
>> 3. Board's action/inaction on the advice is determined to be out of
>>
>> ICANN mission. (Which can be ultimately determined from the  outcome
>>
>> of an IRP)
>>
>>
>> I don't think Becky's proposed edit will ensure such fair play ground
>>
>> and I apologise in advance if it indeed does (and I perhaps did not
>>
>> see
>>
>> it)
>>
>>
>> Regards
>>
>>
>> On 5 Feb 2016 5:27 p.m., "Paul Rosenzweig"
>>
>> <paul.rosenzweig at redbranchconsulting.com<mailto:paul.rosenzweig at redbr
>>
>> an
>>
>> chc
>>
>> <mailto:paul.rosenzweig at redbranchconsulting.com
>> <paul.rosenzweig at redbranchconsulting.com>%3c
>> mailto:paul.rosenzweig at redbranchc%0b> <paul.rosenzweig at redbranchc%0b%3E>>
>> onsulting.com
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__onsulting.com&d=CwMFaQ&c=Od00qP2XTg0tXf_H69-T2w&r=AKn_gzAS4ANpCEqx2GjPwjUkqYPHaN7m0NQNyfQXAgk&m=2VntNON2N-hgYmty4_4QIqVgiZeRrHKjrgphT3EAyW4&s=5KHnoAhrAjr7fAxFcnt_UZe1YtILpdAqVarvKqTo3pE&e=>
>> <http://onsulting.com
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__onsulting.com&d=CwMFaQ&c=Od00qP2XTg0tXf_H69-T2w&r=AKn_gzAS4ANpCEqx2GjPwjUkqYPHaN7m0NQNyfQXAgk&m=2VntNON2N-hgYmty4_4QIqVgiZeRrHKjrgphT3EAyW4&s=5KHnoAhrAjr7fAxFcnt_UZe1YtILpdAqVarvKqTo3pE&e=>>>>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Agree completely.  The compromise outlined on the call yesterday is
>>
>> the last, best final offer.  If the GAC won't accept it, let's have a
>>
>> real vote of the members and move on.
>>
>>
>> Paul
>>
>>
>> Paul Rosenzweig
>>
>> paul.rosenzweig at redbranchconsulting.com<mailto:paul.rosenzweig at redbra
>>
>> nc
>>
>> hco<mailto:paul.rosenzweig at redbranchconsulting.com
>> <paul.rosenzweig at redbranchconsulting.com>%3cmailto:paul.rose <paul.rose>
>>
>> nz
>>
>> weig at redbranchco>
>>
>> nsulting.com
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__nsulting.com&d=CwMFaQ&c=Od00qP2XTg0tXf_H69-T2w&r=AKn_gzAS4ANpCEqx2GjPwjUkqYPHaN7m0NQNyfQXAgk&m=2VntNON2N-hgYmty4_4QIqVgiZeRrHKjrgphT3EAyW4&s=MWcLj9QiWa6FkG9XkRKeXbvFGGWMKuSdoJZOVx0uFBM&e=>
>> <http://nsulting.com
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__nsulting.com&d=CwMFaQ&c=Od00qP2XTg0tXf_H69-T2w&r=AKn_gzAS4ANpCEqx2GjPwjUkqYPHaN7m0NQNyfQXAgk&m=2VntNON2N-hgYmty4_4QIqVgiZeRrHKjrgphT3EAyW4&s=MWcLj9QiWa6FkG9XkRKeXbvFGGWMKuSdoJZOVx0uFBM&e=>
>> >>
>>
>> O: +1 (202) 547-0660<tel:%2B1%20%28202%29%20547-0660
>> <%2B1%20%28202%29%20547-0660>>
>>
>> M: +1 (202) 329-9650<tel:%2B1%20%28202%29%20329-9650
>> <%2B1%20%28202%29%20329-9650>>
>>
>> VOIP: +1 (202) 738-1739<tel:%2B1%20%28202%29%20738-1739
>> <%2B1%20%28202%29%20738-1739>>
>>
>> Skype: paul.rosenzweig1066
>>
>> Link to my PGP Key
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>>
>> From: Burr, Becky
>>
>> [mailto:Becky.Burr at neustar.biz <Becky.Burr at neustar.biz><
>> mailto:Becky.Burr at neustar.biz <Becky.Burr at neustar.biz><mailto:B
>>
>> ec ky.Burr at neustar.biz%3cmailto:Becky.Burr@ <Becky.Burr@>neustar.biz
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__neustar.biz&d=CwMFaQ&c=Od00qP2XTg0tXf_H69-T2w&r=AKn_gzAS4ANpCEqx2GjPwjUkqYPHaN7m0NQNyfQXAgk&m=2VntNON2N-hgYmty4_4QIqVgiZeRrHKjrgphT3EAyW4&s=rQRIrYHFr92nZagvPWY21acWkBCOVd7l7qpHjMxMuts&e=>
>> >>]
>>
>> Sent: Friday, February 5, 2016 10:51 AM
>>
>> To: Olga Cavalli
>>
>> <olgacavalli at gmail.com<mailto:olgacavalli at gmail.com
>> <olgacavalli at gmail.com><mailto:olgacavall
>>
>> i@ gmail.com
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gmail.com&d=CwMFaQ&c=Od00qP2XTg0tXf_H69-T2w&r=AKn_gzAS4ANpCEqx2GjPwjUkqYPHaN7m0NQNyfQXAgk&m=2VntNON2N-hgYmty4_4QIqVgiZeRrHKjrgphT3EAyW4&s=UmPkKYwhHfx6pw_GQWWzAlA9kUvy2SRRKkqprAmO5BQ&e=>
>> %3cmailto:olgacavalli@ <olgacavalli@>gmail.com
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gmail.com&d=CwMFaQ&c=Od00qP2XTg0tXf_H69-T2w&r=AKn_gzAS4ANpCEqx2GjPwjUkqYPHaN7m0NQNyfQXAgk&m=2VntNON2N-hgYmty4_4QIqVgiZeRrHKjrgphT3EAyW4&s=UmPkKYwhHfx6pw_GQWWzAlA9kUvy2SRRKkqprAmO5BQ&e=>
>> >>>;
>>
>> Schaefer, Brett
>>
>> <Brett.Schaefer at heritage.org<mailto:Brett.Schaefer at heritage.org
>> <Brett.Schaefer at heritage.org><mailto:
>>
>> Brett.Schaefer at heritage.org%3cmailto:Brett.Schaefer@ <Brett.Schaefer@>
>> heritage.org
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__heritage.org&d=CwMFaQ&c=Od00qP2XTg0tXf_H69-T2w&r=AKn_gzAS4ANpCEqx2GjPwjUkqYPHaN7m0NQNyfQXAgk&m=2VntNON2N-hgYmty4_4QIqVgiZeRrHKjrgphT3EAyW4&s=GtIfwGU7uMwS_Cpqc1KP7GG4gGXTy4XFz2ep6WZzvKU&e=>
>> >>>
>>
>> Cc:
>>
>> <thomas at rickert.net<mailto:thomas at rickert.net <thomas at rickert.net><
>> mailto:thomas at rickert.n <thomas at rickert.n>
>>
>> et
>>
>> %3cmailto:thomas@ <thomas@>rickert.net
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__rickert.net&d=CwMFaQ&c=Od00qP2XTg0tXf_H69-T2w&r=AKn_gzAS4ANpCEqx2GjPwjUkqYPHaN7m0NQNyfQXAgk&m=2VntNON2N-hgYmty4_4QIqVgiZeRrHKjrgphT3EAyW4&s=kiNCMtKfY_G6S-Qgf_Ze05oQGPlo7GeaNSrd6DUERI0&e=>
>> >>>
>>
>> <thomas at rickert.net<mailto:thomas at rickert.net <thomas at rickert.net><
>> mailto:thomas at rickert.n <thomas at rickert.n>
>>
>> et
>>
>> %3cmailto:thomas@ <thomas@>rickert.net
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__rickert.net&d=CwMFaQ&c=Od00qP2XTg0tXf_H69-T2w&r=AKn_gzAS4ANpCEqx2GjPwjUkqYPHaN7m0NQNyfQXAgk&m=2VntNON2N-hgYmty4_4QIqVgiZeRrHKjrgphT3EAyW4&s=kiNCMtKfY_G6S-Qgf_Ze05oQGPlo7GeaNSrd6DUERI0&e=>
>> >>>;
>>
>> <accountability-cross-community at icann.org<mailto:accountability-cross
>>
>> -c
>>
>> omm
>>
>> <mailto:accountability-cross-community at icann.org
>> <accountability-cross-community at icann.org>%3cmailto:accountabili
>> <accountabili>
>>
>> ty-cross-comm%0b>>unity at icann.org<mailto:unity at icann.org
>> <unity at icann.org>>>>
>>
>> <accountability-cross-community at icann.org<mailto:accountability-cross
>>
>> -c
>>
>> omm
>>
>> <mailto:accountability-cross-community at icann.org
>> <accountability-cross-community at icann.org>%3cmailto:accountabili
>> <accountabili>
>>
>> ty-cross-comm%0b>>unity at icann.org<mailto:unity at icann.org
>> <unity at icann.org>>>>
>>
>> Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Aresteh proposal to resolve Recommendation 1
>>
>> and
>>
>> 11
>>
>> issues
>>
>>
>> Sorry guys - I did not change my proposal - which has always been
>>
>> that the "GAC cannot act in a decision-making role with respect to an
>>
>> exercise of community power designed to challenge the Board¹s
>>
>> implementation of GAC Advice.²  That is clearly stated in the note
>>
>> Jorge copied below.  I see no principled basis for further
>>
>> restricting my proposed compromise to limit this to the IRP.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> J. Beckwith Burr
>>
>> Neustar, Inc. / Deputy
>>
>> General Counsel & Chief Privacy Officer
>>
>> 1775 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington D.C. 20006
>>
>> Office: +1.202.533.2932<tel:%2B1.202.533.2932 <%2B1.202.533.2932>>
>>  Mobile:
>>
>> +1.202.352.6367<tel:%2B1.202.352.6367 <%2B1.202.352.6367>> /
>>
>> +neustar.biz
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__neustar.biz&d=CwMFaQ&c=Od00qP2XTg0tXf_H69-T2w&r=AKn_gzAS4ANpCEqx2GjPwjUkqYPHaN7m0NQNyfQXAgk&m=2VntNON2N-hgYmty4_4QIqVgiZeRrHKjrgphT3EAyW4&s=rQRIrYHFr92nZagvPWY21acWkBCOVd7l7qpHjMxMuts&e=>
>> <http://neustar.biz
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__neustar.biz&d=CwMFaQ&c=Od00qP2XTg0tXf_H69-T2w&r=AKn_gzAS4ANpCEqx2GjPwjUkqYPHaN7m0NQNyfQXAgk&m=2VntNON2N-hgYmty4_4QIqVgiZeRrHKjrgphT3EAyW4&s=rQRIrYHFr92nZagvPWY21acWkBCOVd7l7qpHjMxMuts&e=>
>> ><http://neustar.biz
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__neustar.biz&d=CwMFaQ&c=Od00qP2XTg0tXf_H69-T2w&r=AKn_gzAS4ANpCEqx2GjPwjUkqYPHaN7m0NQNyfQXAgk&m=2VntNON2N-hgYmty4_4QIqVgiZeRrHKjrgphT3EAyW4&s=rQRIrYHFr92nZagvPWY21acWkBCOVd7l7qpHjMxMuts&e=>
>> >
>>
>> <http://www.neustar.biz
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.neustar.biz&d=CwMFaQ&c=Od00qP2XTg0tXf_H69-T2w&r=AKn_gzAS4ANpCEqx2GjPwjUkqYPHaN7m0NQNyfQXAgk&m=2VntNON2N-hgYmty4_4QIqVgiZeRrHKjrgphT3EAyW4&s=HrdlbmWrCO5JBFBy01CZkxzYffOEnj734nbsz6rmC3w&e=>
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 2/5/16, 10:18 AM, "Olga Cavalli"
>>
>> <olgacavalli at gmail.com<mailto:olgacavalli at gmail.com
>> <olgacavalli at gmail.com><mailto:olgacavalli at gmail.com
>> <olgacavalli at gmail.com>%3cmailto:olgacavalli@ <olgacavalli@>gmail.com
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gmail.com&d=CwMFaQ&c=Od00qP2XTg0tXf_H69-T2w&r=AKn_gzAS4ANpCEqx2GjPwjUkqYPHaN7m0NQNyfQXAgk&m=2VntNON2N-hgYmty4_4QIqVgiZeRrHKjrgphT3EAyW4&s=UmPkKYwhHfx6pw_GQWWzAlA9kUvy2SRRKkqprAmO5BQ&e=>>>>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Brett
>>
>> there was no vote on the call yesteday best Olga
>>
>>
>> El 5 feb 2016, a las 11:43 a.m., Schaefer, Brett
>>
>> <Brett.Schaefer at heritage.org<mailto:Brett.Schaefer at heritage.org
>> <Brett.Schaefer at heritage.org><mai
>>
>> lt
>>
>> o:Brett.Schaefer at heritage.org
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__heritage.org&d=CwMFaQ&c=Od00qP2XTg0tXf_H69-T2w&r=AKn_gzAS4ANpCEqx2GjPwjUkqYPHaN7m0NQNyfQXAgk&m=2VntNON2N-hgYmty4_4QIqVgiZeRrHKjrgphT3EAyW4&s=GtIfwGU7uMwS_Cpqc1KP7GG4gGXTy4XFz2ep6WZzvKU&e=>
>> %3cmailto:Brett.Schaefer@ <Brett.Schaefer@>heritage.org
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__heritage.org&d=CwMFaQ&c=Od00qP2XTg0tXf_H69-T2w&r=AKn_gzAS4ANpCEqx2GjPwjUkqYPHaN7m0NQNyfQXAgk&m=2VntNON2N-hgYmty4_4QIqVgiZeRrHKjrgphT3EAyW4&s=GtIfwGU7uMwS_Cpqc1KP7GG4gGXTy4XFz2ep6WZzvKU&e=>
>> >
>>
>> escribió:
>>
>>
>> Kavouss,
>>
>>
>> Becky responded to this yesterday:
>>
>>
>> Julia ­ I inadvertently narrowed the proposal that was on the table
>>
>> when I typed this up.  My proposal from the beginning related to
>>
>> Board action on GAC Advice.  I will resend my original email
>>
>> demonstrating this.
>>
>>
>> I expect she will follow up soon.
>>
>>
>> Speaking for myself, I do not support language the restricts the
>>
>> GAC carve out to IRP.
>>
>>
>> I am willing to support the compromise, including the 60 percent,
>>
>> but it has to be as a package including the most recent version of
>>
>> Becky's text which we discussed and "voted" on in the call yesterday.
>>
>>
>> If we are opening the package back up, I doubt we would resolve
>>
>> this by Tuesday or the next Tuesday or the one after that. We have
>>
>> arrived at a tentative agreement, I suggest we not abandon it.
>>
>>
>> Best,
>>
>>
>> Brett
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Feb 5, 2016, at 3:41 AM, Kavouss Arasteh
>>
>> <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com<mailto:kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com
>> <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com><mailto:
>>
>> ka
>>
>> vouss.arasteh at gmail.com%3cmailto:kavouss.arasteh@ <kavouss.arasteh@>
>> gmail.com
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gmail.com&d=CwMFaQ&c=Od00qP2XTg0tXf_H69-T2w&r=AKn_gzAS4ANpCEqx2GjPwjUkqYPHaN7m0NQNyfQXAgk&m=2VntNON2N-hgYmty4_4QIqVgiZeRrHKjrgphT3EAyW4&s=UmPkKYwhHfx6pw_GQWWzAlA9kUvy2SRRKkqprAmO5BQ&e=>
>> >><mailto
>>
>> :k
>>
>> avo
>>
>> <mailto:kavo%0b>>>>uss.arasteh at gmail.com<mailto:kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com
>> <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com><mailto:uss.arasteh at gmail.com
>> <uss.arasteh at gmail.com>%3cmailto:kavouss.arasteh@ <kavouss.arasteh@>
>> gmail.com
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gmail.com&d=CwMFaQ&c=Od00qP2XTg0tXf_H69-T2w&r=AKn_gzAS4ANpCEqx2GjPwjUkqYPHaN7m0NQNyfQXAgk&m=2VntNON2N-hgYmty4_4QIqVgiZeRrHKjrgphT3EAyW4&s=UmPkKYwhHfx6pw_GQWWzAlA9kUvy2SRRKkqprAmO5BQ&e=>>>>>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Dear Beckie
>>
>> As I mentioned in my earlier message, my GAC colleagues have
>>
>> serious concerns about your revised text as currently contained in
>>
>> the Package,  Jorge has kindly picked up your initial proposal and
>>
>> send it to us  May I request you to kindly replace your current
>>
>> text with your initial one as reproduced by Jorge and PUT A REVISED
>>
>> TEXT for the package on the mailing list for our Monday discussion.
>>
>> As far as I understand, at least those GAC members spoken could be
>>
>> more comfortable to your initial text due to the fact the yr
>>
>> revised text went much beyond your the objectives of your initial
>>
>> text the concept if which if combined with 60% was acceptable to many
>> people.
>>
>> Awaiting your action , I remain
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Kavousd
>>
>>
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>>
>> On 5 Feb 2016, at 12:10,
>>
>> <Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch<mailto:Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch
>> <Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch><mailto:Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch
>> <Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch>%3cmailto:Jorge.Cancio@ <Jorge.Cancio@>
>> bakom.admin.ch
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__bakom.admin.ch&d=CwMFaQ&c=Od00qP2XTg0tXf_H69-T2w&r=AKn_gzAS4ANpCEqx2GjPwjUkqYPHaN7m0NQNyfQXAgk&m=2VntNON2N-hgYmty4_4QIqVgiZeRrHKjrgphT3EAyW4&s=u_vrHu5q3VDoLxmEdlEXBJ3qye2N0aq98rCkW39cKjM&e=>
>> >><mailto:
>>
>> <mailto:%0b>>> <%0b%3E%3E%3E>>Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch<
>> mailto:Jorge.Cancio at bakom.a <Jorge.Cancio at bakom.a>
>>
>> dmin.ch
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__dmin.ch&d=CwMFaQ&c=Od00qP2XTg0tXf_H69-T2w&r=AKn_gzAS4ANpCEqx2GjPwjUkqYPHaN7m0NQNyfQXAgk&m=2VntNON2N-hgYmty4_4QIqVgiZeRrHKjrgphT3EAyW4&s=saRH955v0czKVpdm6JaN9KQMEwt0QIaj_Ztce4Z8yCk&e=>
>> <mailto:Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch <Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch>%3c
>> mailto:Jorge.Cancio at bakom <Jorge.Cancio at bakom>
>>
>> .admin.ch
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__admin.ch&d=CwMFaQ&c=Od00qP2XTg0tXf_H69-T2w&r=AKn_gzAS4ANpCEqx2GjPwjUkqYPHaN7m0NQNyfQXAgk&m=2VntNON2N-hgYmty4_4QIqVgiZeRrHKjrgphT3EAyW4&s=IAeGfA5JxEo947Vu4e0to5nrOd03mNQnJzmDc4WrG6U&e=>
>> >>>>
>>
>> <Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch<mailto:Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch
>> <Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch><mailto:Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch
>> <Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch>%3cmailto:Jorge.Cancio@ <Jorge.Cancio@>
>> bakom.admin.ch
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__bakom.admin.ch&d=CwMFaQ&c=Od00qP2XTg0tXf_H69-T2w&r=AKn_gzAS4ANpCEqx2GjPwjUkqYPHaN7m0NQNyfQXAgk&m=2VntNON2N-hgYmty4_4QIqVgiZeRrHKjrgphT3EAyW4&s=u_vrHu5q3VDoLxmEdlEXBJ3qye2N0aq98rCkW39cKjM&e=>
>> >><mailto:
>>
>> <mailto:%0b>>> <%0b%3E%3E%3E>>Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch<
>> mailto:Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch <Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch><
>> mailto:Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch <Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch>%3c
>> mailto:Jorge.Cancio@ <Jorge.Cancio@>bakom.admin.ch
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__bakom.admin.ch&d=CwMFaQ&c=Od00qP2XTg0tXf_H69-T2w&r=AKn_gzAS4ANpCEqx2GjPwjUkqYPHaN7m0NQNyfQXAgk&m=2VntNON2N-hgYmty4_4QIqVgiZeRrHKjrgphT3EAyW4&s=u_vrHu5q3VDoLxmEdlEXBJ3qye2N0aq98rCkW39cKjM&e=>>>>>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Dear Kavouss, Julia and Becky
>>
>>
>> This is the original proposal by Becky we were referring to
>>
>> (highlights are mine, but text is unchanged):
>>
>>
>> ==
>>
>>
>> Von:
>>
>> accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org<mailto:accountabil
>>
>> it
>>
>> y-c<mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org
>> <accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org>%3cmailto:
>>
>> accountability-c>
>>
>> ross-community-bounces at icann.org><mailto:accountability-cr<mailto:a
>>
>> cc
>>
>> oun<mailto:ross-community-bounces at icann.org
>> <ross-community-bounces at icann.org>%3e%3cmailto:accountabil <accountabil>
>>
>> it
>>
>> y-cr%3cmailto:accoun <accoun>>
>>
>> tability-cr>
>>
>> oss-community-bounces at icann.org<mailto:oss-community-bounces at icann.
>>
>> or
>>
>> g<mailto:oss-community-bounces at icann.org
>> <oss-community-bounces at icann.org>%3cmailto:oss-community-bou
>> <oss-community-bou>
>>
>> nc
>>
>> es at icann.org>>>
>>
>> [mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org
>> <accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org><mailto:acc
>>
>> ou
>>
>> nta
>>
>> bility-cross-community-bounces at icann.org><mailto:accountability-cro
>>
>> ss
>>
>> -community-bounces at icann.org%3cmailto:accounta%0b%3e%3e%3ebility-cr
>> <accounta%0b%3e%3e%3ebility-cr>
>>
>> os s-community-bounces at icann.org%3e>] Im Auftrag von Burr, Becky
>>
>> Gesendet: Freitag, 29. Januar 2016 21:05
>>
>> An: Greg Shatan
>>
>> <gregshatanipc at gmail.com<mailto:gregshatanipc at gmail.com
>> <gregshatanipc at gmail.com><mailto:greg
>>
>> sh
>>
>> atanipc at gmail.com%3cmailto:gregshatanipc@ <gregshatanipc@>gmail.com
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gmail.com&d=CwMFaQ&c=Od00qP2XTg0tXf_H69-T2w&r=AKn_gzAS4ANpCEqx2GjPwjUkqYPHaN7m0NQNyfQXAgk&m=2VntNON2N-hgYmty4_4QIqVgiZeRrHKjrgphT3EAyW4&s=UmPkKYwhHfx6pw_GQWWzAlA9kUvy2SRRKkqprAmO5BQ&e=>
>> >><mailto:gregsha
>>
>> t
>>
>> <mailto:gregshat%0b>>>>anipc at gmail.com<mailto:anipc at gmail.com
>> <anipc at gmail.com>><mailto:
>>
>> gregshatanipc at gmail.com>>>; Mueller,
>>
>> Milton L
>>
>> <milton at gatech.edu<mailto:milton at gatech.edu <milton at gatech.edu><
>> mailto:milton at gatech.ed <milton at gatech.ed>
>>
>> u% 3cmailto:milton@ <milton@>gatech.edu
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gatech.edu&d=CwMFaQ&c=Od00qP2XTg0tXf_H69-T2w&r=AKn_gzAS4ANpCEqx2GjPwjUkqYPHaN7m0NQNyfQXAgk&m=2VntNON2N-hgYmty4_4QIqVgiZeRrHKjrgphT3EAyW4&s=SPAXWQC6Dsx9-zWUlTgefSw18mVTdfNEVkBp5qftNNY&e=>
>> >><mailto:milton at gatech.edu <milton at gatech.edu><ma
>>
>> <mailto:milton at gatech.edu <milton at gatech.edu>%3cma%0b>>>>ilto:milton@
>> gatech.edu
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gatech.edu&d=CwMFaQ&c=Od00qP2XTg0tXf_H69-T2w&r=AKn_gzAS4ANpCEqx2GjPwjUkqYPHaN7m0NQNyfQXAgk&m=2VntNON2N-hgYmty4_4QIqVgiZeRrHKjrgphT3EAyW4&s=SPAXWQC6Dsx9-zWUlTgefSw18mVTdfNEVkBp5qftNNY&e=>
>> <http://gat
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gat&d=CwMFaQ&c=Od00qP2XTg0tXf_H69-T2w&r=AKn_gzAS4ANpCEqx2GjPwjUkqYPHaN7m0NQNyfQXAgk&m=2VntNON2N-hgYmty4_4QIqVgiZeRrHKjrgphT3EAyW4&s=WEOI2s3x2bkzEcuI6sDmynpBYdCfQu9Gx1c8Dm9xmCA&e=>
>>
>> ech.edu
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__ech.edu&d=CwMFaQ&c=Od00qP2XTg0tXf_H69-T2w&r=AKn_gzAS4ANpCEqx2GjPwjUkqYPHaN7m0NQNyfQXAgk&m=2VntNON2N-hgYmty4_4QIqVgiZeRrHKjrgphT3EAyW4&s=q57UP-BUi36awfkk9v0_QmW_zo-iqc1g58fkIrTD4OM&e=>
>> >>>>
>>
>> Cc:
>>
>> accountability-cross-community at icann.org<mailto:accountability-cros
>>
>> s-
>>
>> com<mailto:accountability-cross-community at icann.org
>> <accountability-cross-community at icann.org>%3cmailto:accoun <accoun>
>>
>> ta
>>
>> bility-cross-com>
>>
>> munity at icann.org><mailto:accountability-cross-comm<mailto:accountab
>>
>> il
>>
>> ity<mailto:munity at icann.org <munity at icann.org>%3e%3c
>> mailto:accountability-cross-comm%3 <accountability-cross-comm%253>
>>
>> cm
>>
>> ailto:accountability>
>>
>> -cross-comm>
>>
>> unity at icann.org<mailto:unity at icann.org <unity at icann.org>><
>> mailto:unity at icann.org <unity at icann.org>>>
>>
>> Betreff: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Recommendation 11, 2/3 board threshold,
>>
>> GAC consensus, and finishing
>>
>>
>> I have a proposal for discussion.
>>
>>
>> Start from the premise that ICANN may implement GAC Advice only
>>
>> consistent with the Bylaws, including the Mission.  What if we
>>
>> accept the 2/3rd rejection language but also provide that the GAC
>>
>> cannot act in a decision-making role with respect to an exercise of
>>
>> community power designed to challenge the Board¹s implementation of GAC
>> Advice.
>>
>> In other words, the GAC  would not be counted in the ³no more than
>>
>> two SO/ACs objecting² threshold to a community IRP challenge to the
>>
>> Board¹s implementation of GAC Advice alleged to exceed the scope of
>>
>> ICANN¹s Mission.
>>
>>
>> I think this addresses the two bites at the apple problem we might
>>
>> otherwise have, and provides a safety valve to counter balance the
>>
>> 2/3rds rejection threshold.
>>
>>
>> Just a thought -
>>
>>
>> ===
>>
>>
>> Regards
>>
>>
>> Jorge
>>
>>
>>
>> ________________________________
>>
>> Brett Schaefer
>>
>> Jay Kingham Senior Research Fellow in International Regulatory
>>
>> Affairs  Margaret Thatcher Center for Freedom Davis Institute for
>>
>> National Security and Foreign Policy  The Heritage Foundation
>>
>> 214 Massachusetts Avenue, NE
>>
>> Washington, DC 20002
>>
>> 202-608-6097
>>
>>
>> http://heritage.org
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__heritage.org&d=CwMFaQ&c=Od00qP2XTg0tXf_H69-T2w&r=AKn_gzAS4ANpCEqx2GjPwjUkqYPHaN7m0NQNyfQXAgk&m=2VntNON2N-hgYmty4_4QIqVgiZeRrHKjrgphT3EAyW4&s=GtIfwGU7uMwS_Cpqc1KP7GG4gGXTy4XFz2ep6WZzvKU&e=>
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http
>>
>> -3
>>
>> A__<http://heritage.org%3chttps:/urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__heritage.org-253chttps-3A_urldefense.proofpoint.com_v2_url-3Fu&d=CwMFaQ&c=Od00qP2XTg0tXf_H69-T2w&r=AKn_gzAS4ANpCEqx2GjPwjUkqYPHaN7m0NQNyfQXAgk&m=2VntNON2N-hgYmty4_4QIqVgiZeRrHKjrgphT3EAyW4&s=Gtc6E6VHfgb_i0XKDZwjHaHm1RkAHvgH4oUQoopUHXc&e=>
>>
>> =h
>>
>> ttp-3A__>
>>
>> heritage
>>
>> http://>>.org_&d=CwIGaQ&c=MOptNlVtIETeDALC_lULrw&r=62cJFOifzm6X_GRlaq
>>
>> 8M
>>
>> o8T<http://%3e%3e.org_&d=CwIGaQ&c=MOptNlVtIETeDALC_lULrw&r=62cJFOifzm
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__-26gt-3B-26gt-3B.org-5F-26d-3Dcwigaq-26c-3Dmoptnlvtietedalc-5Flulrw-26r-3D62cjfoifzm&d=CwMFaQ&c=Od00qP2XTg0tXf_H69-T2w&r=AKn_gzAS4ANpCEqx2GjPwjUkqYPHaN7m0NQNyfQXAgk&m=2VntNON2N-hgYmty4_4QIqVgiZeRrHKjrgphT3EAyW4&s=REtqw8XE73ZxbVu-e_HhGfX4ZGLz4PLhRG4i3BAn3uU&e=>
>>
>> 6X
>>
>> _GRlaq8Mo8T>
>>
>> jDmrxdYa
>>
>> hOP8WDDkMr4k&m=dpr1wb6efk7-2HozbeOZXYoAVUioSUB1PWwWVyBult8&s=08yolh
>>
>> J2
>>
>> mGN
>>
>> u
>>
>> 8PN0GVUckj832KfhW8hnHwzonGIi4pw&e= >
>>
>> Von: Kavouss Arasteh
>>
>> [mailto:kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com><
>> mailto:kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com><
>>
>> ma
>>
>> ilto:kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gmail.com&d=CwMFaQ&c=Od00qP2XTg0tXf_H69-T2w&r=AKn_gzAS4ANpCEqx2GjPwjUkqYPHaN7m0NQNyfQXAgk&m=2VntNON2N-hgYmty4_4QIqVgiZeRrHKjrgphT3EAyW4&s=UmPkKYwhHfx6pw_GQWWzAlA9kUvy2SRRKkqprAmO5BQ&e=>
>> %3cmailto:kavouss.arasteh@ <kavouss.arasteh@>gmail.com
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gmail.com&d=CwMFaQ&c=Od00qP2XTg0tXf_H69-T2w&r=AKn_gzAS4ANpCEqx2GjPwjUkqYPHaN7m0NQNyfQXAgk&m=2VntNON2N-hgYmty4_4QIqVgiZeRrHKjrgphT3EAyW4&s=UmPkKYwhHfx6pw_GQWWzAlA9kUvy2SRRKkqprAmO5BQ&e=>
>> >>
>>
>> ]
>>
>> Gesendet: Freitag, 5. Februar 2016 11:41
>>
>> An: Cancio Jorge BAKOM
>>
>> <Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch<mailto:Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch
>> <Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch><mailto:Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch
>> <Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch>%3cmailto:Jorge.Cancio@ <Jorge.Cancio@>
>> bakom.admin.ch
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__bakom.admin.ch&d=CwMFaQ&c=Od00qP2XTg0tXf_H69-T2w&r=AKn_gzAS4ANpCEqx2GjPwjUkqYPHaN7m0NQNyfQXAgk&m=2VntNON2N-hgYmty4_4QIqVgiZeRrHKjrgphT3EAyW4&s=u_vrHu5q3VDoLxmEdlEXBJ3qye2N0aq98rCkW39cKjM&e=>
>> >><mailto:
>>
>> <mailto:%0b>>> <%0b%3E%3E%3E>>Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch<
>> mailto:Jorge.Cancio at bakom.a <Jorge.Cancio at bakom.a>
>>
>> dmin.ch
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__dmin.ch&d=CwMFaQ&c=Od00qP2XTg0tXf_H69-T2w&r=AKn_gzAS4ANpCEqx2GjPwjUkqYPHaN7m0NQNyfQXAgk&m=2VntNON2N-hgYmty4_4QIqVgiZeRrHKjrgphT3EAyW4&s=saRH955v0czKVpdm6JaN9KQMEwt0QIaj_Ztce4Z8yCk&e=>
>> <mailto:Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch <Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch>%3c
>> mailto:Jorge.Cancio at bakom <Jorge.Cancio at bakom>
>>
>> .admin.ch
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__admin.ch&d=CwMFaQ&c=Od00qP2XTg0tXf_H69-T2w&r=AKn_gzAS4ANpCEqx2GjPwjUkqYPHaN7m0NQNyfQXAgk&m=2VntNON2N-hgYmty4_4QIqVgiZeRrHKjrgphT3EAyW4&s=IAeGfA5JxEo947Vu4e0to5nrOd03mNQnJzmDc4WrG6U&e=>
>> >>>>
>>
>> Cc:
>>
>> <jukacz at erst.dk<mailto:jukacz at erst.dk <jukacz at erst.dk><
>> mailto:jukacz at erst.dk <jukacz at erst.dk>%3cmailto:
>>
>> jukacz at erst.dk>><mailto:jukacz at erst.dk <jukacz at erst.dk><mailto:juka
>>
>> <mailto:jukacz at erst.dk <jukacz at erst.dk>%3cmailto:juka%0b>>>
>> <juka%0b%3E%3E%3E>>cz at erst.dk<mailto:cz at erst.d <cz at erst.d>
>>
>> k>>>>
>>
>> <jukacz at erst.dk<mailto:jukacz at erst.dk <jukacz at erst.dk><
>> mailto:jukacz at erst.dk <jukacz at erst.dk>%3cmailto:
>>
>> jukacz at erst.dk>><mailto:jukacz at erst.dk <jukacz at erst.dk><mailto:juka
>>
>> <mailto:jukacz at erst.dk <jukacz at erst.dk>%3cmailto:juka%0b>>>
>> <juka%0b%3E%3E%3E>>cz at erst.dk<mailto:cz at erst.d <cz at erst.d>
>>
>> k>>>>;
>>
>> <accountability-cross-community at icann.org<mailto:accountability-cro
>>
>> ss
>>
>> -co
>>
>> <mailto:accountability-cross-community at icann.org
>> <accountability-cross-community at icann.org>%3cmailto:accountabili
>> <accountabili>
>>
>> ty-cross-co%0b>>>>mmunity at icann.org><mailto:accountability-cross-com<m
>>
>> ailto:accountability<mailto:mmunity at icann.org <mmunity at icann.org>%3e%3c
>> mailto:accountabili <accountabili>
>>
>> ty-cross-com%3cmailto:accountability <accountability>>
>>
>> -cross-com>
>>
>> munity at icann.org<mailto:munity at icann.org <munity at icann.org>><
>> mailto:munity at icann.org <munity at icann.org>>>
>>
>> <accountability-cross-community at icann.org<mailto:accountability-cro
>>
>> ss
>>
>> -co
>>
>> <mailto:accountability-cross-community at icann.org
>> <accountability-cross-community at icann.org>%3cmailto:accountabili
>> <accountabili>
>>
>> ty-cross-co%0b>>>>mmunity at icann.org><mailto:accountability-cross-com<m
>>
>> ailto:accountability<mailto:mmunity at icann.org <mmunity at icann.org>%3e%3c
>> mailto:accountabili <accountabili>
>>
>> ty-cross-com%3cmailto:accountability <accountability>>
>>
>> -cross-com>
>>
>> munity at icann.org<mailto:munity at icann.org <munity at icann.org>><
>> mailto:munity at icann.org <munity at icann.org>>>
>>
>> ;
>>
>> Becky Burr
>>
>> <Becky.Burr at neustar.biz<mailto:Becky.Burr at neustar.biz
>> <Becky.Burr at neustar.biz><mailto:Becky.
>>
>> Bu
>>
>> rr at neustar.biz%3cmailto:Becky.Burr@ <Becky.Burr@>neustar.biz
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__neustar.biz&d=CwMFaQ&c=Od00qP2XTg0tXf_H69-T2w&r=AKn_gzAS4ANpCEqx2GjPwjUkqYPHaN7m0NQNyfQXAgk&m=2VntNON2N-hgYmty4_4QIqVgiZeRrHKjrgphT3EAyW4&s=rQRIrYHFr92nZagvPWY21acWkBCOVd7l7qpHjMxMuts&e=>
>> >><mailto:Becky.Burr
>>
>> <mailto:Becky.Burr%0b>>>>@neustar.biz
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__neustar.biz&d=CwMFaQ&c=Od00qP2XTg0tXf_H69-T2w&r=AKn_gzAS4ANpCEqx2GjPwjUkqYPHaN7m0NQNyfQXAgk&m=2VntNON2N-hgYmty4_4QIqVgiZeRrHKjrgphT3EAyW4&s=rQRIrYHFr92nZagvPWY21acWkBCOVd7l7qpHjMxMuts&e=>
>> <http://neustar.biz
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__neustar.biz&d=CwMFaQ&c=Od00qP2XTg0tXf_H69-T2w&r=AKn_gzAS4ANpCEqx2GjPwjUkqYPHaN7m0NQNyfQXAgk&m=2VntNON2N-hgYmty4_4QIqVgiZeRrHKjrgphT3EAyW4&s=rQRIrYHFr92nZagvPWY21acWkBCOVd7l7qpHjMxMuts&e=>
>> ><mailto:Becky
>>
>> .Burr at neustar.biz>>>; Thomas Rickert
>>
>> <thomas at rickert.net<mailto:thomas at rickert.net <thomas at rickert.net>
>> <mailto:thomas at rickert
>>
>> .n et%3cmailto:thomas@ <thomas@>rickert.net
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__rickert.net&d=CwMFaQ&c=Od00qP2XTg0tXf_H69-T2w&r=AKn_gzAS4ANpCEqx2GjPwjUkqYPHaN7m0NQNyfQXAgk&m=2VntNON2N-hgYmty4_4QIqVgiZeRrHKjrgphT3EAyW4&s=kiNCMtKfY_G6S-Qgf_Ze05oQGPlo7GeaNSrd6DUERI0&e=>
>> >><mailto:thomas at rickert.net <thomas at rickert.net>
>>
>> <mailto:thomas at rickert.net <thomas at rickert.net>%0b>>>><
>> mailto:thomas at rickert.net <thomas at rickert.net>>>>;
>>
>> Mathieu Weill
>>
>> <Mathieu.Weill at afnic.fr<mailto:Mathieu.Weill at afnic.fr
>> <Mathieu.Weill at afnic.fr><mailto:Mathieu.
>>
>> Weill at afnic.fr%3cmailto:Mathieu.Weill@ <Mathieu.Weill@>afnic.fr
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__afnic.fr&d=CwMFaQ&c=Od00qP2XTg0tXf_H69-T2w&r=AKn_gzAS4ANpCEqx2GjPwjUkqYPHaN7m0NQNyfQXAgk&m=2VntNON2N-hgYmty4_4QIqVgiZeRrHKjrgphT3EAyW4&s=Z8tDOMEnBfhmdWPrAzVwyG-OZ_TAZbVRCV4ezC9Uxyc&e=>
>> >><mailto:Mathieu.We
>>
>> <mailto:Mathieu.We%0b>>>>ill at afnic.fr<mailto:ill at afnic.fr <ill at afnic.fr>
>> ><mailto:Math
>>
>> ieu.Weill at afnic.fr>>>; León Felipe
>>
>> Sánchez Ambía
>>
>> <leonfelipe at sanchez.mx<mailto:leonfelipe at sanchez.mx
>> <leonfelipe at sanchez.mx><mailto:leonfeli
>>
>> pe @sanchez.mx
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__sanchez.mx&d=CwMFaQ&c=Od00qP2XTg0tXf_H69-T2w&r=AKn_gzAS4ANpCEqx2GjPwjUkqYPHaN7m0NQNyfQXAgk&m=2VntNON2N-hgYmty4_4QIqVgiZeRrHKjrgphT3EAyW4&s=AVzdOnk_czJnYtUhw89DbcYmfHS7uQHQ-p1BjUgW7PA&e=>
>> %3cmailto:leonfelipe@ <leonfelipe@>sanchez.mx
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__sanchez.mx&d=CwMFaQ&c=Od00qP2XTg0tXf_H69-T2w&r=AKn_gzAS4ANpCEqx2GjPwjUkqYPHaN7m0NQNyfQXAgk&m=2VntNON2N-hgYmty4_4QIqVgiZeRrHKjrgphT3EAyW4&s=AVzdOnk_czJnYtUhw89DbcYmfHS7uQHQ-p1BjUgW7PA&e=>
>> >><mailto:leonfelipe at s
>>
>> <mailto:leonfelipe at s%0b>>>>anchez.mx
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__anchez.mx&d=CwMFaQ&c=Od00qP2XTg0tXf_H69-T2w&r=AKn_gzAS4ANpCEqx2GjPwjUkqYPHaN7m0NQNyfQXAgk&m=2VntNON2N-hgYmty4_4QIqVgiZeRrHKjrgphT3EAyW4&s=NHTGsZd_7Xs1knHZEjWWVoNCz9LNKxl-WD1PNGOj4s4&e=>
>> <http://anchez.mx
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__anchez.mx&d=CwMFaQ&c=Od00qP2XTg0tXf_H69-T2w&r=AKn_gzAS4ANpCEqx2GjPwjUkqYPHaN7m0NQNyfQXAgk&m=2VntNON2N-hgYmty4_4QIqVgiZeRrHKjrgphT3EAyW4&s=NHTGsZd_7Xs1knHZEjWWVoNCz9LNKxl-WD1PNGOj4s4&e=>
>> ><mailto:leonfeli
>>
>> pe at sanchez.mx>>>;
>>
>> Schneider Thomas BAKOM
>>
>> <Thomas.Schneider at bakom.admin.ch<mailto:Thomas.Schneider at bakom.admin
>> <Thomas.Schneider at bakom.admin>.
>>
>> ch<mailto:Thomas.Schneider at bakom.admin.ch
>> <Thomas.Schneider at bakom.admin.ch>%3cmailto:Thomas.Schneider
>> <Thomas.Schneider>
>>
>> @b
>>
>> akom.admin.ch
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__akom.admin.ch&d=CwMFaQ&c=Od00qP2XTg0tXf_H69-T2w&r=AKn_gzAS4ANpCEqx2GjPwjUkqYPHaN7m0NQNyfQXAgk&m=2VntNON2N-hgYmty4_4QIqVgiZeRrHKjrgphT3EAyW4&s=5m1Wu4_QF6gCTq1iMMVb_273bS7EFLGYD9CyaejWu-E&e=>
>> >>
>>
>> <mailto:Thomas.Schneider at bakom.admin.ch <Thomas.Schneider at bakom.admin.ch>
>> <mailto:Thomas.Schneider at bak
>>
>> om
>>
>> .ad
>>
>> <mailto:Thomas.Schneider at bakom.admin.ch <Thomas.Schneider at bakom.admin.ch>
>> %3cmailto:Thomas.Schneider at bako <Thomas.Schneider at bako>
>>
>> m.ad%0b>>>>min.ch
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__min.ch&d=CwMFaQ&c=Od00qP2XTg0tXf_H69-T2w&r=AKn_gzAS4ANpCEqx2GjPwjUkqYPHaN7m0NQNyfQXAgk&m=2VntNON2N-hgYmty4_4QIqVgiZeRrHKjrgphT3EAyW4&s=jjfmbIWBm7Ffx6QzdROvG_rTO66AgO3JjqjFneu7scI&e=>
>> <http://min.ch
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__min.ch&d=CwMFaQ&c=Od00qP2XTg0tXf_H69-T2w&r=AKn_gzAS4ANpCEqx2GjPwjUkqYPHaN7m0NQNyfQXAgk&m=2VntNON2N-hgYmty4_4QIqVgiZeRrHKjrgphT3EAyW4&s=jjfmbIWBm7Ffx6QzdROvG_rTO66AgO3JjqjFneu7scI&e=>
>> >>>>
>>
>> Betreff: Re: AW: [CCWG-ACCT] Aresteh proposal to resolve
>>
>> Recommendation
>>
>> 1 and 11 issues
>>
>>
>> Dear Beckie,
>>
>> Pls note several concerns and questions raised by some GAC member
>>
>> requesting to replace your text in the "package" with your initial
>>
>> Text . This may help GAC colleagues to favourably review the"page
>>
>> deal" if includes your original text.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Kavouss
>>
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>>
>> On 5 Feb 2016, at 11:26,
>>
>> <Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch<mailto:Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch
>> <Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch><mailto:Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch
>> <Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch>%3cmailto:Jorge.Cancio@ <Jorge.Cancio@>
>> bakom.admin.ch
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__bakom.admin.ch&d=CwMFaQ&c=Od00qP2XTg0tXf_H69-T2w&r=AKn_gzAS4ANpCEqx2GjPwjUkqYPHaN7m0NQNyfQXAgk&m=2VntNON2N-hgYmty4_4QIqVgiZeRrHKjrgphT3EAyW4&s=u_vrHu5q3VDoLxmEdlEXBJ3qye2N0aq98rCkW39cKjM&e=>
>> >><mailto:
>>
>> <mailto:%0b>>> <%0b%3E%3E%3E>>Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch<
>> mailto:Jorge.Cancio at bakom.a <Jorge.Cancio at bakom.a>
>>
>> dmin.ch
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__dmin.ch&d=CwMFaQ&c=Od00qP2XTg0tXf_H69-T2w&r=AKn_gzAS4ANpCEqx2GjPwjUkqYPHaN7m0NQNyfQXAgk&m=2VntNON2N-hgYmty4_4QIqVgiZeRrHKjrgphT3EAyW4&s=saRH955v0czKVpdm6JaN9KQMEwt0QIaj_Ztce4Z8yCk&e=>
>> <mailto:Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch <Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch>%3c
>> mailto:Jorge.Cancio at bakom <Jorge.Cancio at bakom>
>>
>> .admin.ch
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__admin.ch&d=CwMFaQ&c=Od00qP2XTg0tXf_H69-T2w&r=AKn_gzAS4ANpCEqx2GjPwjUkqYPHaN7m0NQNyfQXAgk&m=2VntNON2N-hgYmty4_4QIqVgiZeRrHKjrgphT3EAyW4&s=IAeGfA5JxEo947Vu4e0to5nrOd03mNQnJzmDc4WrG6U&e=>
>> >>>>
>>
>> <Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch<mailto:Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch
>> <Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch><mailto:Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch
>> <Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch>%3cmailto:Jorge.Cancio@ <Jorge.Cancio@>
>> bakom.admin.ch
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__bakom.admin.ch&d=CwMFaQ&c=Od00qP2XTg0tXf_H69-T2w&r=AKn_gzAS4ANpCEqx2GjPwjUkqYPHaN7m0NQNyfQXAgk&m=2VntNON2N-hgYmty4_4QIqVgiZeRrHKjrgphT3EAyW4&s=u_vrHu5q3VDoLxmEdlEXBJ3qye2N0aq98rCkW39cKjM&e=>
>> >><mailto:
>>
>> <mailto:%0b>>> <%0b%3E%3E%3E>>Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch<
>> mailto:Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch <Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch><
>> mailto:Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch <Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch>%3c
>> mailto:Jorge.Cancio@ <Jorge.Cancio@>bakom.admin.ch
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__bakom.admin.ch&d=CwMFaQ&c=Od00qP2XTg0tXf_H69-T2w&r=AKn_gzAS4ANpCEqx2GjPwjUkqYPHaN7m0NQNyfQXAgk&m=2VntNON2N-hgYmty4_4QIqVgiZeRrHKjrgphT3EAyW4&s=u_vrHu5q3VDoLxmEdlEXBJ3qye2N0aq98rCkW39cKjM&e=>>>>>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Dear Kavouss
>>
>>
>> In fact, that (constraining the carve-out to the exercise of
>>
>> community
>>
>> IRP) would be a very sensible starting point and would avoid many
>>
>> concerns which are being raised (at least) in my national consultations.
>>
>>
>> Regards
>>
>>
>> Jorge
>>
>>
>> Von: Kavouss Arasteh
>>
>> [mailto:kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com><
>> mailto:kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com><
>>
>> ma
>>
>> ilto:kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gmail.com&d=CwMFaQ&c=Od00qP2XTg0tXf_H69-T2w&r=AKn_gzAS4ANpCEqx2GjPwjUkqYPHaN7m0NQNyfQXAgk&m=2VntNON2N-hgYmty4_4QIqVgiZeRrHKjrgphT3EAyW4&s=UmPkKYwhHfx6pw_GQWWzAlA9kUvy2SRRKkqprAmO5BQ&e=>
>> %3cmailto:kavouss.arasteh@ <kavouss.arasteh@>gmail.com
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gmail.com&d=CwMFaQ&c=Od00qP2XTg0tXf_H69-T2w&r=AKn_gzAS4ANpCEqx2GjPwjUkqYPHaN7m0NQNyfQXAgk&m=2VntNON2N-hgYmty4_4QIqVgiZeRrHKjrgphT3EAyW4&s=UmPkKYwhHfx6pw_GQWWzAlA9kUvy2SRRKkqprAmO5BQ&e=>
>> >>
>>
>> ]
>>
>> Gesendet: Freitag, 5. Februar 2016 11:25
>>
>> An: Cancio Jorge BAKOM
>>
>> <Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch<mailto:Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch
>> <Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch><mailto:Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch
>> <Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch>%3cmailto:Jorge.Cancio@ <Jorge.Cancio@>
>> bakom.admin.ch
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__bakom.admin.ch&d=CwMFaQ&c=Od00qP2XTg0tXf_H69-T2w&r=AKn_gzAS4ANpCEqx2GjPwjUkqYPHaN7m0NQNyfQXAgk&m=2VntNON2N-hgYmty4_4QIqVgiZeRrHKjrgphT3EAyW4&s=u_vrHu5q3VDoLxmEdlEXBJ3qye2N0aq98rCkW39cKjM&e=>
>> >><mailto:
>>
>> <mailto:%0b>>> <%0b%3E%3E%3E>>Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch<
>> mailto:Jorge.Cancio at bakom.a <Jorge.Cancio at bakom.a>
>>
>> dmin.ch
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__dmin.ch&d=CwMFaQ&c=Od00qP2XTg0tXf_H69-T2w&r=AKn_gzAS4ANpCEqx2GjPwjUkqYPHaN7m0NQNyfQXAgk&m=2VntNON2N-hgYmty4_4QIqVgiZeRrHKjrgphT3EAyW4&s=saRH955v0czKVpdm6JaN9KQMEwt0QIaj_Ztce4Z8yCk&e=>
>> <mailto:Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch <Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch>%3c
>> mailto:Jorge.Cancio at bakom <Jorge.Cancio at bakom>
>>
>> .admin.ch
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__admin.ch&d=CwMFaQ&c=Od00qP2XTg0tXf_H69-T2w&r=AKn_gzAS4ANpCEqx2GjPwjUkqYPHaN7m0NQNyfQXAgk&m=2VntNON2N-hgYmty4_4QIqVgiZeRrHKjrgphT3EAyW4&s=IAeGfA5JxEo947Vu4e0to5nrOd03mNQnJzmDc4WrG6U&e=>
>> >>>>
>>
>> Cc:
>>
>> <jukacz at erst.dk<mailto:jukacz at erst.dk <jukacz at erst.dk><
>> mailto:jukacz at erst.dk <jukacz at erst.dk>%3cmailto:
>>
>> jukacz at erst.dk>><mailto:jukacz at erst.dk <jukacz at erst.dk><mailto:juka
>>
>> <mailto:jukacz at erst.dk <jukacz at erst.dk>%3cmailto:juka%0b>>>
>> <juka%0b%3E%3E%3E>>cz at erst.dk<mailto:cz at erst.d <cz at erst.d>
>>
>> k>>>>
>>
>> <jukacz at erst.dk<mailto:jukacz at erst.dk <jukacz at erst.dk><
>> mailto:jukacz at erst.dk <jukacz at erst.dk>%3cmailto:
>>
>> jukacz at erst.dk>><mailto:jukacz at erst.dk <jukacz at erst.dk><mailto:juka
>>
>> <mailto:jukacz at erst.dk <jukacz at erst.dk>%3cmailto:juka%0b>>>
>> <juka%0b%3E%3E%3E>>cz at erst.dk<mailto:cz at erst.d <cz at erst.d>
>>
>> k>>>>;
>>
>> <accountability-cross-community at icann.org<mailto:accountability-cro
>>
>> ss
>>
>> -co
>>
>> <mailto:accountability-cross-community at icann.org
>> <accountability-cross-community at icann.org>%3cmailto:accountabili
>> <accountabili>
>>
>> ty-cross-co%0b>>>>mmunity at icann.org><mailto:accountability-cross-com<m
>>
>> ailto:accountability<mailto:mmunity at icann.org <mmunity at icann.org>%3e%3c
>> mailto:accountabili <accountabili>
>>
>> ty-cross-com%3cmailto:accountability <accountability>>
>>
>> -cross-com>
>>
>> munity at icann.org<mailto:munity at icann.org <munity at icann.org>><
>> mailto:munity at icann.org <munity at icann.org>>>
>>
>> <accountability-cross-community at icann.org<mailto:accountability-cro
>>
>> ss
>>
>> -co
>>
>> <mailto:accountability-cross-community at icann.org
>> <accountability-cross-community at icann.org>%3cmailto:accountabili
>> <accountabili>
>>
>> ty-cross-co%0b>>>>mmunity at icann.org><mailto:accountability-cross-com<m
>>
>> ailto:accountability<mailto:mmunity at icann.org <mmunity at icann.org>%3e%3c
>> mailto:accountabili <accountabili>
>>
>> ty-cross-com%3cmailto:accountability <accountability>>
>>
>> -cross-com>
>>
>> munity at icann.org<mailto:munity at icann.org <munity at icann.org>><
>> mailto:munity at icann.org <munity at icann.org>>>
>>
>> Betreff: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Aresteh proposal to resolve Recommendation
>>
>> 1 and 11 issues
>>
>>
>> Dear All,
>>
>> Why Not taking initial Beckie,s
>>
>> Proposal , as I mentioned in the call and do not  get into other
>>
>> questions resulted from het revised text.
>>
>> Julia realised this and raised it before our devoted call  Regards
>>
>> Kavousd
>>
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>>
>> On 5 Feb 2016, at 10:58,
>>
>> <Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch<mailto:Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch
>> <Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch><mailto:Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch
>> <Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch>%3cmailto:Jorge.Cancio@ <Jorge.Cancio@>
>> bakom.admin.ch
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__bakom.admin.ch&d=CwMFaQ&c=Od00qP2XTg0tXf_H69-T2w&r=AKn_gzAS4ANpCEqx2GjPwjUkqYPHaN7m0NQNyfQXAgk&m=2VntNON2N-hgYmty4_4QIqVgiZeRrHKjrgphT3EAyW4&s=u_vrHu5q3VDoLxmEdlEXBJ3qye2N0aq98rCkW39cKjM&e=>
>> >><mailto:
>>
>> <mailto:%0b>>> <%0b%3E%3E%3E>>Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch<
>> mailto:Jorge.Cancio at bakom.a <Jorge.Cancio at bakom.a>
>>
>> dmin.ch
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__dmin.ch&d=CwMFaQ&c=Od00qP2XTg0tXf_H69-T2w&r=AKn_gzAS4ANpCEqx2GjPwjUkqYPHaN7m0NQNyfQXAgk&m=2VntNON2N-hgYmty4_4QIqVgiZeRrHKjrgphT3EAyW4&s=saRH955v0czKVpdm6JaN9KQMEwt0QIaj_Ztce4Z8yCk&e=>
>> <mailto:Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch <Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch>%3c
>> mailto:Jorge.Cancio at bakom <Jorge.Cancio at bakom>
>>
>> .admin.ch
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__admin.ch&d=CwMFaQ&c=Od00qP2XTg0tXf_H69-T2w&r=AKn_gzAS4ANpCEqx2GjPwjUkqYPHaN7m0NQNyfQXAgk&m=2VntNON2N-hgYmty4_4QIqVgiZeRrHKjrgphT3EAyW4&s=IAeGfA5JxEo947Vu4e0to5nrOd03mNQnJzmDc4WrG6U&e=>
>> >>>>
>>
>> <Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch<mailto:Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch
>> <Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch><mailto:Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch
>> <Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch>%3cmailto:Jorge.Cancio@ <Jorge.Cancio@>
>> bakom.admin.ch
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__bakom.admin.ch&d=CwMFaQ&c=Od00qP2XTg0tXf_H69-T2w&r=AKn_gzAS4ANpCEqx2GjPwjUkqYPHaN7m0NQNyfQXAgk&m=2VntNON2N-hgYmty4_4QIqVgiZeRrHKjrgphT3EAyW4&s=u_vrHu5q3VDoLxmEdlEXBJ3qye2N0aq98rCkW39cKjM&e=>
>> >><mailto:
>>
>> <mailto:%0b>>> <%0b%3E%3E%3E>>Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch<
>> mailto:Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch <Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch><
>> mailto:Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch <Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch>%3c
>> mailto:Jorge.Cancio@ <Jorge.Cancio@>bakom.admin.ch
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__bakom.admin.ch&d=CwMFaQ&c=Od00qP2XTg0tXf_H69-T2w&r=AKn_gzAS4ANpCEqx2GjPwjUkqYPHaN7m0NQNyfQXAgk&m=2VntNON2N-hgYmty4_4QIqVgiZeRrHKjrgphT3EAyW4&s=u_vrHu5q3VDoLxmEdlEXBJ3qye2N0aq98rCkW39cKjM&e=>>>>>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Dear all
>>
>>
>> I agree that Julia raises a very significant point here, which
>>
>> probably did not get enough attention due to the other discussions
>>
>> we were having yesterday.
>>
>>
>> A carve-out that excludes the GAC from the exercise of any
>>
>> community decisions related to Board implementation seems overbroad
>>
>> and mean a complete exclusion of the GAC from any community
>>
>> decisions which are relevant to it.
>>
>>
>> This change in Becky¹s initial proposal (where the carve-out was
>>
>> directly linked to the community IRP) is very significant.
>>
>>
>> Regards
>>
>>
>> Jorge
>>
>>
>> Von:
>>
>> accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org<mailto:accountabil
>>
>> it
>>
>> y-c<mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org
>> <accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org>%3cmailto:
>>
>> accountability-c>
>>
>> ross-community-bounces at icann.org><mailto:accountability-cr<mailto:a
>>
>> cc
>>
>> oun<mailto:ross-community-bounces at icann.org
>> <ross-community-bounces at icann.org>%3e%3cmailto:accountabil <accountabil>
>>
>> it
>>
>> y-cr%3cmailto:accoun <accoun>>
>>
>> tability-cr>
>>
>> oss-community-bounces at icann.org<mailto:oss-community-bounces at icann.
>>
>> or
>>
>> g<mailto:oss-community-bounces at icann.org
>> <oss-community-bounces at icann.org>%3cmailto:oss-community-bou
>> <oss-community-bou>
>>
>> nc
>>
>> es at icann.org>>>
>>
>> [mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org
>> <accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org><mailto:acc
>>
>> ou
>>
>> nta
>>
>> bility-cross-community-bounces at icann.org><mailto:accountability-cro
>>
>> ss
>>
>> -community-bounces at icann.org%3cmailto:accounta%0b%3e%3e%3ebility-cr
>> <accounta%0b%3e%3e%3ebility-cr>
>>
>> os s-community-bounces at icann.org%3e>] Im Auftrag von Julia Katja
>>
>> Wolman
>>
>> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 4. Februar 2016 10:34
>>
>> An: 'CCWG Accountability'
>>
>> <accountability-cross-community at icann.org<mailto:accountability-cro
>>
>> ss
>>
>> -co
>>
>> <mailto:accountability-cross-community at icann.org
>> <accountability-cross-community at icann.org>%3cmailto:accountabili
>> <accountabili>
>>
>> ty-cross-co%0b>>>>mmunity at icann.org><mailto:accountability-cross-com<m
>>
>> ailto:accountability<mailto:mmunity at icann.org <mmunity at icann.org>%3e%3c
>> mailto:accountabili <accountabili>
>>
>> ty-cross-com%3cmailto:accountability <accountability>>
>>
>> -cross-com>
>>
>> munity at icann.org<mailto:munity at icann.org <munity at icann.org>><
>> mailto:munity at icann.org <munity at icann.org>>>
>>
>> Betreff: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Aresteh proposal to resolve Recommendation
>>
>> 1 and 11 issues
>>
>>
>> Dear Co-Chairs, Kavouss, Becky, all
>>
>>
>> Thank you for putting together the different pieces of text in
>>
>> order to develop a compromise. It is our understanding that the
>>
>> proposed text for modification of rec 1 was the one proposed by
>>
>> Becky (email of 2
>>
>> February) and is the text, which has been the focus of our discussion:
>>
>>
>> ³
>>
>> Burr Proposal:
>>
>>
>>
>> ?         Modify Rec #1/Annex 1:  Add the following to the end of
>>
>> Paragraph 23.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> The GAC may not, however, participate as a decision maker in the
>>
>> Empowered Community¹s consideration of the exercise a community
>>
>> power for the purpose of challenging or blocking the Board¹s
>>
>> implementation of GAC Advice in a manner alleged to violate the
>>
>> Bylaws. In such cases, the GAC remains free to participate in
>>
>> community deliberations in an advisory capacity, but its views will
>>
>> not count towards or against otherwise agreed thresholds needed to
>>
>> initiate a conference call, convene a Community Forum, or exercise
>>
>> a specific Community Power.  This carve out preserves the ICANN
>>
>> Board¹s unique obligation to work with the GAC try to find a
>>
>> mutually acceptable solution to implementation of GAC Advice
>>
>> supported by consensus (as defined in Rec. #11) while protecting
>>
>> the community¹s power to challenge Board decisions that would cause
>>
>> ICANN to violate its Bylaws.²
>>
>>
>> However, the latest text proposal in the email below uses the text
>>
>> suggested by Brett  (email of 2 February). Our understanding is
>>
>> that the above initial text from Becky refers to a Board decision
>>
>> based on GAC advice, which would violate ICANN¹s Bylaws and that it
>>
>> refers to the community IRP to challenge such a Board decision
>>
>> based on GAC advice. As such, Becky¹s initial text proposal (above)
>>
>> should be the text to be considered at today¹s call.
>>
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>>
>>
>> Finn and Julia
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Julia Katja Wolman
>>
>>
>> DANISH BUSINESS AUTHORITY
>>
>>
>> Dahlerups Pakhus
>>
>> Langelinie Allé 17
>>
>> DK-2100 København Ø
>>
>> Telephone: +45 3529 1000
>>
>> Direct: +45 35291308
>>
>> E-mail:
>>
>> jukacz at erst.dk<mailto:jukacz at erst.dk <jukacz at erst.dk>><
>> mailto:jukacz at erst.dk <jukacz at erst.dk>><mailto
>>
>> :j
>>
>> ukacz at erst.dk<mailto:jukac
>>
>> z at erst.dk<mailto:z at erst.dk <z at erst.dk>>>>
>>
>>
>> http://www.erhvervsstyrelsen.dk
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.erhvervsstyrelsen.dk&d=CwMFaQ&c=Od00qP2XTg0tXf_H69-T2w&r=AKn_gzAS4ANpCEqx2GjPwjUkqYPHaN7m0NQNyfQXAgk&m=2VntNON2N-hgYmty4_4QIqVgiZeRrHKjrgphT3EAyW4&s=UmB3s21IfuNbh13VrL_P3pm-s8gzWnm-3M6j6nI_348&e=>
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v
>>
>> 2/
>>
>> url<http://www.erhvervsstyrelsen.dk%3chttps:/urldefense.proofpoint
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.erhvervsstyrelsen.dk-253chttps-3A_urldefense.proofpoint&d=CwMFaQ&c=Od00qP2XTg0tXf_H69-T2w&r=AKn_gzAS4ANpCEqx2GjPwjUkqYPHaN7m0NQNyfQXAgk&m=2VntNON2N-hgYmty4_4QIqVgiZeRrHKjrgphT3EAyW4&s=Ijs5G7Ftbj3C-WUg-8E5J-aeUiLlyHyrAA9dgrbn_kg&e=>
>> .
>>
>> co
>>
>> m/v2/url>
>>
>> ?u=http-
>>
>> 3A__www.erhvervsstyrelsen.dk<http://3A__www.erhvervsstyrelsen.dk
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__3a-5F-5Fwww.erhvervsstyrelsen.dk&d=CwMFaQ&c=Od00qP2XTg0tXf_H69-T2w&r=AKn_gzAS4ANpCEqx2GjPwjUkqYPHaN7m0NQNyfQXAgk&m=2VntNON2N-hgYmty4_4QIqVgiZeRrHKjrgphT3EAyW4&s=WEbCbAM7VuGbzjgvfUiwjCbGrx9N0Rf_XbVUUhaPeeY&e=>
>> >&d
>>
>> =C wIG aQ&c=MOptNlVtIETeDALC_lULrw&r=62cJFOif
>>
>> zm6X_GRlaq8Mo8TjDmrxdYahOP8WDDkMr4k&m=dpr1wb6efk7-2HozbeOZXYoAVUioS
>>
>> UB
>>
>> 1PW
>>
>> w
>>
>> WVyBult8&s=EjeWDl2T5TA3BJzYGL6fNcerDy-BOaHwVO2GfVt0NJE&e= >
>>
>>
>> MINISTRY FOR BUSINESS AND GROWTH
>>
>>
>> P Please consider the environment before printing this email.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Fra:
>>
>> accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org<mailto:accountabil
>>
>> it
>>
>> y-c<mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org
>> <accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org>%3cmailto:
>>
>> accountability-c>
>>
>> ross-community-bounces at icann.org><mailto:accountability-cr<mailto:a
>>
>> cc
>>
>> oun<mailto:ross-community-bounces at icann.org
>> <ross-community-bounces at icann.org>%3e%3cmailto:accountabil <accountabil>
>>
>> it
>>
>> y-cr%3cmailto:accoun <accoun>>
>>
>> tability-cr>
>>
>> oss-community-bounces at icann.org<mailto:oss-community-bounces at icann.
>>
>> or
>>
>> g<mailto:oss-community-bounces at icann.org
>> <oss-community-bounces at icann.org>%3cmailto:oss-community-bou
>> <oss-community-bou>
>>
>> nc
>>
>> es at icann.org>>>
>>
>> [mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org
>> <accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org><mailto:acc
>>
>> ou
>>
>> nta
>>
>> bility-cross-community-bounces at icann.org><mailto:accountability-cro
>>
>> ss
>>
>> -community-bounces at icann.org%3cmailto:accounta%0b%3e%3e%3ebility-cr
>> <accounta%0b%3e%3e%3ebility-cr>
>>
>> os s-community-bounces at icann.org%3e>] På vegne af Burr, Becky
>>
>> Sendt: 4. februar 2016 00:19
>>
>> Til: Kavouss Arasteh;
>>
>> accountability-cross-community at icann.org<mailto:accountability-cros
>>
>> s-
>>
>> com<mailto:accountability-cross-community at icann.org
>> <accountability-cross-community at icann.org>%3cmailto:accoun <accoun>
>>
>> ta
>>
>> bility-cross-com>
>>
>> munity at icann.org><mailto:accountability-cross-comm<mailto:accountab
>>
>> il
>>
>> ity<mailto:munity at icann.org <munity at icann.org>%3e%3c
>> mailto:accountability-cross-comm%3 <accountability-cross-comm%253>
>>
>> cm
>>
>> ailto:accountability>
>>
>> -cross-comm>
>>
>> unity at icann.org<mailto:unity at icann.org <unity at icann.org>><
>> mailto:unity at icann.org <unity at icann.org>>>;
>>
>> Mathieu Weill; Thomas Rickert; León Felipe Sánchez Ambía
>>
>> Emne: [CCWG-ACCT] Aresteh proposal to resolve Recommendation 1 and
>>
>> 11 issues
>>
>>
>> Thank you Kavouss for this suggested approach.  We have all been
>>
>> working very hard and in good faith for over a year to develop a
>>
>> consensus proposal.  My understanding is that this is designed to
>>
>> resolve all open issues in Recommendation 1 and 11.  I am
>>
>> supportive of this package deal, as described below (the
>>
>> description below was also included in Kavouss¹ email).  I
>>
>> appreciate the collaborative spirit we have brought to the table
>>
>> and hope we can use our Dedicated Rec. 11 call tomorrow to reach
>> consensus!
>>
>>
>>
>> 1. Modify Rec #1/Annex 1 and Rec #2/Annex 2
>>
>> ·      Add the following to the end of Paragraph 23 in Rec #1/Annex 1:
>>
>>
>> The GAC may not, however, participate as a decision maker in the
>>
>> Empowered Community¹s consideration of the exercise a community
>>
>> power for the purpose of challenging or blocking the Board¹s
>>
>> implementation of GAC Advice. In such cases, the GAC remains free
>>
>> to participate in community deliberations in an advisory capacity,
>>
>> but its views will not count towards or against otherwise agreed
>>
>> thresholds needed to initiate a conference call, convene a
>>
>> Community Forum, or exercise a specific Community Power.  This
>>
>> carve out preserves the ICANN Board¹s unique obligation to work
>>
>> with the GAC try to find a mutually acceptable solution to
>>
>> implementation of GAC Advice supported by consensus (as defined in
>>
>> Rec. #11) while protecting the community¹s power to challenge such Board
>> decisions.
>>
>> ·      Modify the Table in Rec. #2/Annex 2 to reflect this carve out
>>
>> and add the following language to cover situations that would
>>
>> otherwise require the support of four SOs or ACs:
>>
>>
>> The CCWG-Accountability also recommends that in a situation where
>>
>> the GAC may not participate as a Decisional AC because the
>>
>> community power is proposed to be used to challenge the Board¹s
>>
>> implementation of GAC Advice and the threshold is set at four in
>>
>> support, the power will still be validly exercised if three are in
>>
>> support and no more than one objects.
>>
>> 2.   Modify Recommendation 11 to reflect 60% threshold for rejection of
>>
>> GAC advice by Board, with note to drafters that supermajority
>>
>> requirement is not intended to create any presumption or modify the
>>
>> standard applied by the Board in reviewing GAC Advice.
>>
>>  3. During dedicated Recommendation 11 meetings (4 February and 8
>>
>> February)
>>
>>
>> *    Discuss and accept Recommendation 1 with change described above
>>
>> as first final reading;
>>
>> *    Discuss and accept Recommendation 2 with change described above
>>
>> as first final reading; and
>>
>> *   Discuss and accept Recommendation 11 with changes described above
>>
>> as first final reading.
>>
>> 4.   Submit the package deal to the CCWG for final consideration (2nd
>>
>> final reading) at its conference call scheduled for 9 February,
>>
>> noting delicate balance requiring compromise on all sides to reach
>>
>> consensus and recommending adoption ³as is² (assuming consensus on
>>
>> Dedicated Recommendation 11 calls).
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> J. Beckwith Burr
>>
>> Neustar, Inc. / Deputy General Counsel & Chief Privacy Officer
>>
>> 1775 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington D.C. 20006
>>
>> Office: +1.202.533.2932  Mobile: +1.202.352.6367 /
>>
>> neustar.biz
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__neustar.biz&d=CwMFaQ&c=Od00qP2XTg0tXf_H69-T2w&r=AKn_gzAS4ANpCEqx2GjPwjUkqYPHaN7m0NQNyfQXAgk&m=2VntNON2N-hgYmty4_4QIqVgiZeRrHKjrgphT3EAyW4&s=rQRIrYHFr92nZagvPWY21acWkBCOVd7l7qpHjMxMuts&e=>
>> <http://neustar.biz
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__neustar.biz&d=CwMFaQ&c=Od00qP2XTg0tXf_H69-T2w&r=AKn_gzAS4ANpCEqx2GjPwjUkqYPHaN7m0NQNyfQXAgk&m=2VntNON2N-hgYmty4_4QIqVgiZeRrHKjrgphT3EAyW4&s=rQRIrYHFr92nZagvPWY21acWkBCOVd7l7qpHjMxMuts&e=>
>> ><http://neustar.biz
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__neustar.biz&d=CwMFaQ&c=Od00qP2XTg0tXf_H69-T2w&r=AKn_gzAS4ANpCEqx2GjPwjUkqYPHaN7m0NQNyfQXAgk&m=2VntNON2N-hgYmty4_4QIqVgiZeRrHKjrgphT3EAyW4&s=rQRIrYHFr92nZagvPWY21acWkBCOVd7l7qpHjMxMuts&e=>
>> ><http://www.neus
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.neus&d=CwMFaQ&c=Od00qP2XTg0tXf_H69-T2w&r=AKn_gzAS4ANpCEqx2GjPwjUkqYPHaN7m0NQNyfQXAgk&m=2VntNON2N-hgYmty4_4QIqVgiZeRrHKjrgphT3EAyW4&s=2PUd-2B5kmyJjzfZM90Pim0LySYCYfR8ID6S63UrXus&e=>
>>
>> ta r.biz
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__r.biz&d=CwMFaQ&c=Od00qP2XTg0tXf_H69-T2w&r=AKn_gzAS4ANpCEqx2GjPwjUkqYPHaN7m0NQNyfQXAgk&m=2VntNON2N-hgYmty4_4QIqVgiZeRrHKjrgphT3EAyW4&s=ENjjcG0Hicj2PD0T3Zsbg22ppEoqQxmwliklHtZlPSI&e=>
>> <http://neustar.biz%3e%3chttp:/www.neustar.biz
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__neustar.biz-253e-253chttp-3A_www.neustar.biz&d=CwMFaQ&c=Od00qP2XTg0tXf_H69-T2w&r=AKn_gzAS4ANpCEqx2GjPwjUkqYPHaN7m0NQNyfQXAgk&m=2VntNON2N-hgYmty4_4QIqVgiZeRrHKjrgphT3EAyW4&s=iTpR0rMW7n5cpCjw_ksnW_E7ByuJeJSZk243T0P7V7c&e=>
>> >>
>>
>>
>> From: Kavouss Arasteh
>>
>> <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com<mailto:kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com
>> <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com><mailto:
>>
>> ka
>>
>> vouss.arasteh at gmail.com%3cmailto:kavouss.arasteh@ <kavouss.arasteh@>
>> gmail.com
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gmail.com&d=CwMFaQ&c=Od00qP2XTg0tXf_H69-T2w&r=AKn_gzAS4ANpCEqx2GjPwjUkqYPHaN7m0NQNyfQXAgk&m=2VntNON2N-hgYmty4_4QIqVgiZeRrHKjrgphT3EAyW4&s=UmPkKYwhHfx6pw_GQWWzAlA9kUvy2SRRKkqprAmO5BQ&e=>
>> >><mailto
>>
>> :k
>>
>> avo
>>
>> <mailto:kavo%0b>>>>uss.arasteh at gmail.com<mailto:kavouss.arasteh at gmail.
>>
>> com<mailto:uss.arasteh at gmail.com <uss.arasteh at gmail.com>%3c
>> mailto:kavouss.arasteh@ <kavouss.arasteh@>gmail.com
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gmail.com&d=CwMFaQ&c=Od00qP2XTg0tXf_H69-T2w&r=AKn_gzAS4ANpCEqx2GjPwjUkqYPHaN7m0NQNyfQXAgk&m=2VntNON2N-hgYmty4_4QIqVgiZeRrHKjrgphT3EAyW4&s=UmPkKYwhHfx6pw_GQWWzAlA9kUvy2SRRKkqprAmO5BQ&e=>
>> >>>
>>
>>
>> Date: Wednesday, February 3, 2016 at 4:56 PM
>>
>> To: Accountability Community
>>
>> <accountability-cross-community at icann.org<mailto:accountability-cro
>>
>> ss
>>
>> -co
>>
>> <mailto:accountability-cross-community at icann.org
>> <accountability-cross-community at icann.org>%3cmailto:accountabili
>> <accountabili>
>>
>> ty-cross-co%0b>>>>mmunity at icann.org><mailto:accountability-cross-com<m
>>
>> ailto:accountability<mailto:mmunity at icann.org <mmunity at icann.org>%3e%3c
>> mailto:accountabili <accountabili>
>>
>> ty-cross-com%3cmailto:accountability <accountability>>
>>
>> -cross-com>
>>
>> munity at icann.org<mailto:munity at icann.org <munity at icann.org>><
>> mailto:munity at icann.org <munity at icann.org>>>
>>
>> ,
>>
>> Becky Burr
>>
>> <becky.burr at neustar.biz<mailto:becky.burr at neustar.biz
>> <becky.burr at neustar.biz><mailto:becky.
>>
>> bu
>>
>> rr at neustar.biz%3cmailto:becky.burr@ <becky.burr@>neustar.biz
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__neustar.biz&d=CwMFaQ&c=Od00qP2XTg0tXf_H69-T2w&r=AKn_gzAS4ANpCEqx2GjPwjUkqYPHaN7m0NQNyfQXAgk&m=2VntNON2N-hgYmty4_4QIqVgiZeRrHKjrgphT3EAyW4&s=rQRIrYHFr92nZagvPWY21acWkBCOVd7l7qpHjMxMuts&e=>
>> >><mailto:becky.burr
>>
>> <mailto:becky.burr%0b>>>>@neustar.biz
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__neustar.biz&d=CwMFaQ&c=Od00qP2XTg0tXf_H69-T2w&r=AKn_gzAS4ANpCEqx2GjPwjUkqYPHaN7m0NQNyfQXAgk&m=2VntNON2N-hgYmty4_4QIqVgiZeRrHKjrgphT3EAyW4&s=rQRIrYHFr92nZagvPWY21acWkBCOVd7l7qpHjMxMuts&e=>
>> <http://neustar.biz
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__neustar.biz&d=CwMFaQ&c=Od00qP2XTg0tXf_H69-T2w&r=AKn_gzAS4ANpCEqx2GjPwjUkqYPHaN7m0NQNyfQXAgk&m=2VntNON2N-hgYmty4_4QIqVgiZeRrHKjrgphT3EAyW4&s=rQRIrYHFr92nZagvPWY21acWkBCOVd7l7qpHjMxMuts&e=>
>> ><mailto:becky
>>
>> .burr at neustar.biz>>>, Mathieu Weill
>>
>> <Mathieu.Weill at afnic.fr<mailto:Mathieu.Weill at afnic.fr
>> <Mathieu.Weill at afnic.fr><mailto:Mathieu.
>>
>> Weill at afnic.fr%3cmailto:Mathieu.Weill@ <Mathieu.Weill@>afnic.fr
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__afnic.fr&d=CwMFaQ&c=Od00qP2XTg0tXf_H69-T2w&r=AKn_gzAS4ANpCEqx2GjPwjUkqYPHaN7m0NQNyfQXAgk&m=2VntNON2N-hgYmty4_4QIqVgiZeRrHKjrgphT3EAyW4&s=Z8tDOMEnBfhmdWPrAzVwyG-OZ_TAZbVRCV4ezC9Uxyc&e=>
>> >><mailto:Mathieu.We
>>
>> <mailto:Mathieu.We%0b>>>>ill at afnic.fr<mailto:ill at afnic.fr <ill at afnic.fr>
>> ><mailto:Math
>>
>> ieu.Weill at afnic.fr>>>, Thomas Rickert
>>
>> <thomas at rickert.net<mailto:thomas at rickert.net <thomas at rickert.net>
>> <mailto:thomas at rickert
>>
>> .n et%3cmailto:thomas@ <thomas@>rickert.net
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__rickert.net&d=CwMFaQ&c=Od00qP2XTg0tXf_H69-T2w&r=AKn_gzAS4ANpCEqx2GjPwjUkqYPHaN7m0NQNyfQXAgk&m=2VntNON2N-hgYmty4_4QIqVgiZeRrHKjrgphT3EAyW4&s=kiNCMtKfY_G6S-Qgf_Ze05oQGPlo7GeaNSrd6DUERI0&e=>
>> >><mailto:thomas at rickert.net <thomas at rickert.net>
>>
>> <mailto:thomas at rickert.net <thomas at rickert.net>%0b>>>><
>> mailto:thomas at rickert.net <thomas at rickert.net>>>>, León
>>
>> Felipe Sánchez
>>
>> Ambía
>>
>> <leonfelipe at sanchez.mx<mailto:leonfelipe at sanchez.mx
>> <leonfelipe at sanchez.mx><mailto:leonfeli
>>
>> pe @sanchez.mx
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__sanchez.mx&d=CwMFaQ&c=Od00qP2XTg0tXf_H69-T2w&r=AKn_gzAS4ANpCEqx2GjPwjUkqYPHaN7m0NQNyfQXAgk&m=2VntNON2N-hgYmty4_4QIqVgiZeRrHKjrgphT3EAyW4&s=AVzdOnk_czJnYtUhw89DbcYmfHS7uQHQ-p1BjUgW7PA&e=>
>> %3cmailto:leonfelipe@ <leonfelipe@>sanchez.mx
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__sanchez.mx&d=CwMFaQ&c=Od00qP2XTg0tXf_H69-T2w&r=AKn_gzAS4ANpCEqx2GjPwjUkqYPHaN7m0NQNyfQXAgk&m=2VntNON2N-hgYmty4_4QIqVgiZeRrHKjrgphT3EAyW4&s=AVzdOnk_czJnYtUhw89DbcYmfHS7uQHQ-p1BjUgW7PA&e=>
>> >><mailto:leonfelipe at s
>>
>> <mailto:leonfelipe at s%0b>>>>anchez.mx
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__anchez.mx&d=CwMFaQ&c=Od00qP2XTg0tXf_H69-T2w&r=AKn_gzAS4ANpCEqx2GjPwjUkqYPHaN7m0NQNyfQXAgk&m=2VntNON2N-hgYmty4_4QIqVgiZeRrHKjrgphT3EAyW4&s=NHTGsZd_7Xs1knHZEjWWVoNCz9LNKxl-WD1PNGOj4s4&e=>
>> <http://anchez.mx
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__anchez.mx&d=CwMFaQ&c=Od00qP2XTg0tXf_H69-T2w&r=AKn_gzAS4ANpCEqx2GjPwjUkqYPHaN7m0NQNyfQXAgk&m=2VntNON2N-hgYmty4_4QIqVgiZeRrHKjrgphT3EAyW4&s=NHTGsZd_7Xs1knHZEjWWVoNCz9LNKxl-WD1PNGOj4s4&e=>
>> ><mailto:leonfeli
>>
>> pe at sanchez.mx>>>
>>
>> Subject: <no subject>
>>
>>
>>
>> Dear Esteemed and respectful  CCWG Colleagues
>>
>>
>> First of all, allow me to share the following thought with you:
>>
>> We are in a crucial time for the CCWG requiring to act in a
>>
>> coordinated  manner  on the upcoming Devoted Calls with the aim of
>>
>> assisting the CCWG  in finalizing Recommendation 11,including some
>>
>> adjustments in Recommendation 1  which enable CCWG to assemble the
>>
>> Supplementary Report. This Report needs to be  issued  well in
>>
>> advance of the Marrakech meeting if the overall timeline for IANA
>>
>> stewardship transition is to be maintained. Given that the CCWG is
>>
>> working hard to agree a compromise in the current round of virtual
>>
>> meetings,
>>
>>
>> I wish to reiterate what I mentioned at various occasions that we
>>
>> need to be pragmatic and tolerable, to be more open to any possible
>>
>> set of solution with a view to find a compromise and not merely
>>
>> insist on the wishes, requirements and expectations of every single
>>
>> SO and AC but on the contrary make utmost efforts to satisfy ,to
>>
>> the extent practiceable and possible  the entire community.
>>
>>
>> We are aware of the sensitive elements of Recommendation 1 as well
>>
>> as those of Recommendation 11
>>
>>
>> We have made considerable progress to almost bring the views of the
>>
>> interested parties together.
>>
>>
>> However, there are some more bits to be done. In ICT network
>>
>> connection, the Last kilometer or perhaps last hundred meters of
>>
>> the connection  are sometimes more complex to  compared with the
>>
>> entire network to provide an overall inclusive connection.
>>
>>
>> We have succeeded to find workable solutions for many of these last
>>
>> kilometers in various area .It remains to finish that last
>>
>> kilometer which located in a rocky and mountainous area
>>
>>
>> We need to also make out utmost effort to move forward from our
>>
>> current position which is different from each other and not rule
>>
>> out compromise as a backward step. Our role  is to make concession
>>
>> towards each other position  .We need to take every possible
>>
>> initiative to move forward to timely complete this proposal on enhanced
>> accountability.
>>
>>
>> Frankly speaking and from a professional view point, and as a
>>
>> participant of CCWG and Liaison of ICG to CCWG, I think we should
>>
>> really be more open, constructively, objectively and efficiently
>>
>>
>> To this effect , I wish to suggest a package deal which needs to be
>>
>> accepted or rejected as a whole without being disintegrated/
>>
>> decomposed .
>>
>>
>> The Pack Deal is simple straightforward and practical
>>
>>
>> 1.  Modify Recommendation 1 to add the language as proposed  by
>>
>> Beckie 2.  Maintain the rest of Recommendation 1 Unchanged 3.
>>
>> Accept the 60% threshold for GAC advice ,if to be rejected by the
>>
>> Board 4.  Maintain the rest of Recommendation  11 Unchanged 5.  No
>>
>> other  discussion ,what so ever, on these two Recommendation 6.
>>
>> Submit the Package Deal to the forthcoming CCWG scheduled to be
>>
>> held on 09 February with a note from Beckie indicating that this is
>>
>> a delicate balance ,a sensitive compromise and recommend to the
>>
>> CCWG to take it as it is
>>
>>
>> I have no intention of being presumptuous about this, and you are
>>
>> of course entirely free to reject my suggestions.  Please note that
>>
>> my proposal requires a change to Recommendation 1 and a conforming
>>
>> change to Recommendation 2.  To be consistent with our standard
>>
>> procedures, I suggest we conduct 1rst final readings of the
>>
>> compromise during our Dedicated Rec 11 calls (scheduled for 4 Feb
>>
>> and
>>
>> 8 Feb) and the 2nd final reading during our regular call on 9 Feb.
>>
>> Please note that I have also included Malcolm¹s requested
>>
>> clarification regarding no changes with respect to presumptions or
>>
>> standard of review.  I do not believe that this text is strictly
>>
>> necessary, but in the interests of getting everyone on board I think it
>> makes sense to include it.
>>
>>
>> Package Deal
>>
>>
>> 1. Modify Rec #1/Annex 1 and Rec #2/Annex 2
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ·      Add the following to the end of Paragraph 23 in Rec #1/Annex 1:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> The GAC may not, however, participate as a decision maker in the
>>
>> Empowered Community¹s consideration of the exercise a community
>>
>> power for the purpose of challenging or blocking the Board¹s
>>
>> implementation of GAC Advice. In such cases, the GAC remains free
>>
>> to participate in community deliberations in an advisory capacity,
>>
>> but its views will not count towards or against otherwise agreed
>>
>> thresholds needed to initiate a conference call, convene a
>>
>> Community Forum, or exercise a specific Community Power.  This
>>
>> carve out preserves the ICANN Board¹s unique obligation to work
>>
>> with the GAC try to find a mutually acceptable solution to
>>
>> implementation of GAC Advice supported by consensus (as defined in
>>
>> Rec. #11) while protecting the community¹s power to challenge such Board
>> decisions.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ·      Modify the Table in Rec. #2/Annex 2 to reflect this carve out
>>
>> and add the following language to cover situations that would
>>
>> otherwise require the support of four SOs or ACs:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> The CCWG-Accountability also recommends that in a situation where
>>
>> the GAC may not participate as a Decisional AC because the
>>
>> community power is proposed to be used to challenge the Board¹s
>>
>> implementation of GAC Advice and the threshold is set at four in
>>
>> support, the power will still be validly exercised if three are in
>>
>> support and no more than one objects.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 2.   Modify Recommendation 11 to reflect 60% threshold for rejection of
>>
>> GAC advice by Board, with note to drafters that supermajority
>>
>> requirement is not intended to create any presumption or modify the
>>
>> standard applied by the Board in reviewing GAC Advice.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 3. During dedicated Recommendation 11 meetings (4 February and 8
>>
>> February)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ·      Discuss and accept Recommendation 1 with change described above
>>
>> as first final reading;
>>
>>
>> ·      Discuss and accept Recommendation 2 with change described above
>>
>> as first final reading; and
>>
>>
>> ·      Discuss and accept Recommendation 11 with changes described
>>
>> above as first final reading.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 4.   Submit the package deal to the CCWG for final consideration (2nd
>>
>> final reading) at its conference call scheduled for 9 February,
>>
>> noting delicate balance requiring compromise on all sides to reach
>>
>> consensus and recommending adoption ³as is² (assuming consensus on
>>
>> Dedicated Recommendation 11 calls).
>>
>>
>> Kavouss
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>>
>>
>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org<mailto:Accountability-Cros
>>
>> s-
>>
>> Com<mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>> <Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org>%3cmailto:Accoun <Accoun>
>>
>> ta
>>
>> bility-Cross-Com>
>>
>> munity at icann.org><mailto:Accountability-Cross-Comm<mailto:Accountab
>>
>> il
>>
>> ity<mailto:munity at icann.org <munity at icann.org>%3e%3c
>> mailto:Accountability-Cross-Comm%3 <Accountability-Cross-Comm%253>
>>
>> cm
>>
>> ailto:Accountability>
>>
>> -Cross-Comm>
>>
>> unity at icann.org<mailto:unity at icann.org <unity at icann.org>><
>> mailto:unity at icann.org <unity at icann.org>>>
>>
>>
>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mm.icann.org_m
>>
>> ai
>>
>> lma
>>
>> n
>>
>> _listinfo_accountability-2Dcross-2Dcommunity&d=CwIGaQ&c=MOptNlVtIET
>>
>> eD
>>
>> ALC
>>
>> _
>>
>> lULrw&r=62cJFOifzm6X_GRlaq8Mo8TjDmrxdYahOP8WDDkMr4k&m=dpr1wb6efk7-2
>>
>> Ho
>>
>> zbe
>>
>> O
>>
>> ZXYoAVUioSUB1PWwWVyBult8&s=gnMQACbj2P2Z3vpkeKbIgyRri1DCeZcVIu6D5X-w
>>
>> C7
>>
>> M&e
>>
>> =
>>
>>
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mm.icann.org_
>>
>> ma
>>
>> ilm
>>
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mm.icann.org_mai
>>
>> lm%0b>>>>a
>>
>> n_listinfo_accountability-2Dcross-2Dcommunity&d=CwIGaQ&c=MOptNlVtIE
>>
>> Te
>>
>> DAL
>>
>> C
>>
>> _lULrw&r=62cJFOifzm6X_GRlaq8Mo8TjDmrxdYahOP8WDDkMr4k&m=dpr1wb6efk7-
>>
>> 2H
>>
>> ozb
>>
>> e
>>
>> OZXYoAVUioSUB1PWwWVyBult8&s=gnMQACbj2P2Z3vpkeKbIgyRri1DCeZcVIu6D5X-
>>
>> wC
>>
>> 7M&
>>
>> e
>>
>> = >
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>>
>>
>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org<mailto:Accountability-Cros
>>
>> s-
>>
>> Com<mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>> <Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org>%3cmailto:Accoun <Accoun>
>>
>> ta
>>
>> bility-Cross-Com>
>>
>> munity at icann.org><mailto:Accountability-Cross-Comm<mailto:Accountab
>>
>> il
>>
>> ity<mailto:munity at icann.org <munity at icann.org>%3e%3c
>> mailto:Accountability-Cross-Comm%3 <Accountability-Cross-Comm%253>
>>
>> cm
>>
>> ailto:Accountability>
>>
>> -Cross-Comm>
>>
>> unity at icann.org<mailto:unity at icann.org <unity at icann.org>><
>> mailto:unity at icann.org <unity at icann.org>>>
>>
>>
>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mm.icann.org_m
>>
>> ai
>>
>> lma
>>
>> n
>>
>> _listinfo_accountability-2Dcross-2Dcommunity&d=CwIGaQ&c=MOptNlVtIET
>>
>> eD
>>
>> ALC
>>
>> _
>>
>> lULrw&r=62cJFOifzm6X_GRlaq8Mo8TjDmrxdYahOP8WDDkMr4k&m=dpr1wb6efk7-2
>>
>> Ho
>>
>> zbe
>>
>> O
>>
>> ZXYoAVUioSUB1PWwWVyBult8&s=gnMQACbj2P2Z3vpkeKbIgyRri1DCeZcVIu6D5X-w
>>
>> C7
>>
>> M&e
>>
>> =
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>>
>>
>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org<mailto:Accountability-Cros
>>
>> s-
>>
>> Com<mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>> <Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org>%3cmailto:Accoun <Accoun>
>>
>> ta
>>
>> bility-Cross-Com> munity at icann.org<mailto:munity at icann.org
>> <munity at icann.org>>>
>>
>>
>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mm.icann.org_m
>>
>> ai
>>
>> lma
>>
>> n
>>
>> _listinfo_accountability-2Dcross-2Dcommunity&d=CwIGaQ&c=MOptNlVtIET
>>
>> eD
>>
>> ALC
>>
>> _
>>
>> lULrw&r=62cJFOifzm6X_GRlaq8Mo8TjDmrxdYahOP8WDDkMr4k&m=dpr1wb6efk7-2
>>
>> Ho
>>
>> zbe
>>
>> O
>>
>> ZXYoAVUioSUB1PWwWVyBult8&s=gnMQACbj2P2Z3vpkeKbIgyRri1DCeZcVIu6D5X-w
>>
>> C7
>>
>> M&e
>>
>> =
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>>
>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org<mailto:Accountability-Cross
>>
>> -C
>>
>> omm<mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>> <Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org>%3cmailto:Account <Account>
>>
>> ab
>>
>> ility-Cross-Comm> unity at icann.org<mailto:unity at icann.org
>> <unity at icann.org>>>
>>
>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mm.icann.org_ma
>>
>> il
>>
>> man
>>
>> _
>>
>> listinfo_accountability-2Dcross-2Dcommunity&d=CwIGaQ&c=MOptNlVtIETeD
>>
>> AL
>>
>> C_l
>>
>> U
>>
>> Lrw&r=62cJFOifzm6X_GRlaq8Mo8TjDmrxdYahOP8WDDkMr4k&m=dpr1wb6efk7-2Hoz
>>
>> be
>>
>> OZX
>>
>> Y
>>
>> oAVUioSUB1PWwWVyBult8&s=gnMQACbj2P2Z3vpkeKbIgyRri1DCeZcVIu6D5X-wC7M&
>>
>> e=
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>>
>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org<mailto:Accountability-Cross-
>>
>> Co
>>
>> mmu<mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>> <Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org>%3cmailto:Accounta <Accounta>
>>
>> bi
>>
>> lity-Cross-Commu>
>>
>> nity at icann.org<mailto:nity at icann.org <nity at icann.org>>>
>>
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mm.icann.org_mailman_listinfo_accountability-2Dcross-2Dcommunity&d=CwMFaQ&c=Od00qP2XTg0tXf_H69-T2w&r=AKn_gzAS4ANpCEqx2GjPwjUkqYPHaN7m0NQNyfQXAgk&m=2VntNON2N-hgYmty4_4QIqVgiZeRrHKjrgphT3EAyW4&s=fcfdcYu9QNPfDJOD8vtvJdZa5Rd7sqW87pw849B10HU&e=>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>>
>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org<mailto:Accountability-Cross-
>>
>> Co
>>
>> mmu<mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>> <Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org>%3cmailto:Accounta <Accounta>
>>
>> bi
>>
>> lity-Cross-Commu>
>>
>> nity at icann.org<mailto:nity at icann.org <nity at icann.org>>>
>>
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mm.icann.org_mailman_listinfo_accountability-2Dcross-2Dcommunity&d=CwMFaQ&c=Od00qP2XTg0tXf_H69-T2w&r=AKn_gzAS4ANpCEqx2GjPwjUkqYPHaN7m0NQNyfQXAgk&m=2VntNON2N-hgYmty4_4QIqVgiZeRrHKjrgphT3EAyW4&s=fcfdcYu9QNPfDJOD8vtvJdZa5Rd7sqW87pw849B10HU&e=>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>>
>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org<mailto:Accountability-Cross-
>>
>> Co
>>
>> mmu<mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>> <Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org>%3cmailto:Accounta <Accounta>
>>
>> bi
>>
>> lity-Cross-Commu>
>>
>> nity at icann.org<mailto:nity at icann.org <nity at icann.org>>>
>>
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mm.icann.org_mailman_listinfo_accountability-2Dcross-2Dcommunity&d=CwMFaQ&c=Od00qP2XTg0tXf_H69-T2w&r=AKn_gzAS4ANpCEqx2GjPwjUkqYPHaN7m0NQNyfQXAgk&m=2VntNON2N-hgYmty4_4QIqVgiZeRrHKjrgphT3EAyW4&s=fcfdcYu9QNPfDJOD8vtvJdZa5Rd7sqW87pw849B10HU&e=>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>>
>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org<mailto:Accountability-Cross-
>>
>> Co
>>
>> mmu<mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>> <Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org>%3cmailto:Accounta <Accounta>
>>
>> bi
>>
>> lity-Cross-Commu>
>>
>> nity at icann.org<mailto:nity at icann.org <nity at icann.org>>>
>>
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mm.icann.org_mailman_listinfo_accountability-2Dcross-2Dcommunity&d=CwMFaQ&c=Od00qP2XTg0tXf_H69-T2w&r=AKn_gzAS4ANpCEqx2GjPwjUkqYPHaN7m0NQNyfQXAgk&m=2VntNON2N-hgYmty4_4QIqVgiZeRrHKjrgphT3EAyW4&s=fcfdcYu9QNPfDJOD8vtvJdZa5Rd7sqW87pw849B10HU&e=>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>>
>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org<mailto:Accountability-Cross-
>>
>> Co
>>
>> mmunity at icann.org>
>>
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mm.icann.org_mailman_listinfo_accountability-2Dcross-2Dcommunity&d=CwMFaQ&c=Od00qP2XTg0tXf_H69-T2w&r=AKn_gzAS4ANpCEqx2GjPwjUkqYPHaN7m0NQNyfQXAgk&m=2VntNON2N-hgYmty4_4QIqVgiZeRrHKjrgphT3EAyW4&s=fcfdcYu9QNPfDJOD8vtvJdZa5Rd7sqW87pw849B10HU&e=>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>>
>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org<mailto:Accountability-Cross-C
>>
>> ommunity at icann.org>
>>
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mm.icann.org_mailman_listinfo_accountability-2Dcross-2Dcommunity&d=CwMFaQ&c=Od00qP2XTg0tXf_H69-T2w&r=AKn_gzAS4ANpCEqx2GjPwjUkqYPHaN7m0NQNyfQXAgk&m=2VntNON2N-hgYmty4_4QIqVgiZeRrHKjrgphT3EAyW4&s=fcfdcYu9QNPfDJOD8vtvJdZa5Rd7sqW87pw849B10HU&e=>
>>
>> <GNSO Council Response to CCWG-Accountability - FINAL - 22 January
>> 2016.pdf>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>>
>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>>
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mm.icann.org_mailman_listinfo_accountability-2Dcross-2Dcommunity&d=CwMFaQ&c=Od00qP2XTg0tXf_H69-T2w&r=AKn_gzAS4ANpCEqx2GjPwjUkqYPHaN7m0NQNyfQXAgk&m=2VntNON2N-hgYmty4_4QIqVgiZeRrHKjrgphT3EAyW4&s=fcfdcYu9QNPfDJOD8vtvJdZa5Rd7sqW87pw849B10HU&e=>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mm.icann.org_mailman_listinfo_accountability-2Dcross-2Dcommunity&d=CwMFaQ&c=Od00qP2XTg0tXf_H69-T2w&r=AKn_gzAS4ANpCEqx2GjPwjUkqYPHaN7m0NQNyfQXAgk&m=2VntNON2N-hgYmty4_4QIqVgiZeRrHKjrgphT3EAyW4&s=fcfdcYu9QNPfDJOD8vtvJdZa5Rd7sqW87pw849B10HU&e=>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ****************************************************************************************************
>> This e-mail is sent by a law firm and may contain information that is
>> privileged or confidential.
>> If you are not the intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and any
>> attachments and notify us
>> immediately.
>>
>>
>> ****************************************************************************************************
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20160207/ded735fc/attachment-0001.html>