[CCWG-ACCT] CCWG - Recommendation 6 - Final Text with Board Compromise Language and Avri's amendment to meeting NTIA criteria
Dr. Tatiana Tropina
t.tropina at mpicc.de
Tue Feb 9 09:10:20 UTC 2016
Agree with Bruce and Alan (with the idea, the suggested wording might
need a bit of fine-tuning).
The broad/neutral language is much more suitable for the bylaw.
Whether this will be a separate group (doesn't make sense to me
personally) or a part of broader WS2 group and how it will be chartered
can be decided later.
Best regards
Tatiana
On 09/02/16 10:05, Bruce Tonkin wrote:
> I suggest replacing the text:
>
> “
> (or another Cross Community Working Group chartered for such purpose by one or more Supporting Organizations or Advisory Committees)
> “
>
> With
>
> “Or another appropriately chartered, generally/widely supported, cross community working group” as per Alan’s suggestion.
>
> Regards,
> Bruce Tonkin
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community
mailing list