[CCWG-ACCT] CCWG-Accountability-WS2 - 27-28 September Plenary Agenda and Materials - 1 of 2 - FoI text proposal to bridge divergences

[avri doria]

Hi,

I disagree.  It is one of the factors that makes certain parts of the
Guidelines less appropriate for ICANN than for GE.  One of the things
several of us attempted during the long course of the subgroup, before
the matter was referred to the plenary, was to get Ruggie to to produce
an explanatory version specific for Not-for-profit as he has done for
other groups.

So my two recommended edits, i.e inclusion of the "not-for-profit"
modifier and the phrase "as appropriate" were in recognition of this
being the case.

avri



On 29-Sep-17 03:23, Nigel Roberts wrote:
>
>
> On 29/09/17 07:23, Greg Shatan wrote:
>> Whether ICANN is non-profit or not is beside the point.  That is not
>> the issue.
> Agreed. It is entirely beside the point and has no place in any
> statement as if it did.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community