[ALT-Plus] [ALAC-Members] Meeting with other groups in Kobe

Marita Moll mmoll at ca.inter.net
Fri Dec 28 02:17:18 UTC 2018


Hi Maureen. Here's a possible topic for a session with GNSO. I was 
reading the International Center for Dispute Resolution case re: Afilias 
and ICANN and the following information was provided re: GNSO policy 
recommendations re: the a new gTLD program:

"The New gTLD Program has produced ICANN’s most ambitious expansion of 
the Internet’s naming system. Under the Program, any interested party 
could apply for the opportunity to operate new gTLDs that were not 
already in use in the DNS, meaning that there was no cap on the number 
of new gTLDs that could be added to the Internet. The Program was 
designed to enhance diversity, creativity and consumer choice in gTLDs, 
and to provide the benefits of innovation to consumers./The Program 
arose from policy recommendations by ICANN’s Generic Names Supporting 
Organization (“GNSO”), which were based on community input during the 
period 2005-2007. On 26 June 2008, the ICANN Board adopted the GNSO’s 
policy recommendations and directed the ICANN organization to develop an 
implementation plan for the Program, to be provided to the Board for 
approval" (italics added)
/

Given the fact that At-large is asking if there really is a need/demand 
for another round, where that demand is coming from and what is the 
benefit to end users of more gTLDs -- maybe this might be a topic that 
could be explored.

Marita
//

On 12/23/2018 9:18 PM, Maureen Hilyard wrote:
> Hi everyone
>
> Hope your plans for Xmas Day are coming along well.. 🎄🎄🎄
>
> But just before you start celebrating.. can I please ask you to give 
> some thought after Xmas, if you can remember to do so, as to what you 
> would like to ask the following groups, if we were to ask them to come 
> to an ALAC working session.
>
> *GAC *- Yrjo and Ana have been working diligently on their topics 
> based on our feedback so we can then work on the how we present these 
> together. We have a session planned with them already.
>
> *ccNSO *- Barrack and Wafa are asking the ccNSO If they want to see 
> us, or is there anything that the ALAC wants to know about or of the 
> ccNSO - I know that they have their Review coming up soon. I hope they 
> are preparing better than we did so that there are no 
> surprises 😡 Session still TBC
>
> *SSAC*? Andrei has been sending us some interesting reports.. any 
> questions?
>
> *RSSAC*?  - did anyone read theirReview Report (July 2018 
> <https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/rssac-review-final-02jul18-en.pdf>) 
> - interesting..
>
> *ASO*? have we met with the ASO before? should we? We would have to 
> bring in the 5 RIRs - would need a lot of coordinating.
>
> *GNSO* -  we haven't had a meeting with the GNSO since Heather was 
> appointed. They now have a new leader Keith Drasek.. anyone want to 
> ask Keith anything?
>
>  - and if we do ask anything of anyone, what kind of response are we 
> after? (so its not just a lecture)..
>
> Just asking....
>
> Merry Xmas 😊
> Maureen
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ALAC-Members mailing list
> ALAC-Members at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac-members
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/private/alt-plus/attachments/20181227/ab83d134/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the ALT-Plus mailing list