[ALT-Plus] [ALAC-Members] Questions for the Board, etc

[Seun Ojedeji]

Hello Maureen,

One question came to me as I was reading a mail of an ICANN staff, the
question is; "Does the Board foresee any risk in the continued
institutionalisation of certain activity in her personnel."

My reason for this question is that it seem as activity is coming up more
job titles are being created to match such activity which IMO may make it
difficult to retire such activity in future.

Some of us have noted in the past about that significant number of reviews
within ICANN I saw there is a title called "senior reviews coordinator"
since there is a "senior" there is perhaps "reviews coordinator(s)" that in
itself could continue to bloat the personnel base of the organisation.

I know some believes raising concern about ICANN personnel may impact upon
atlarge but I don't think this should be the case. While I know this issue
is not entirely of the Board since it's the community that requests the
review, I think there may be a need to introduce a staff analysis phase
that will help the community really understand the cost implication of what
is being proposed before discussions get to approval level.

Regards
Sent from my mobile
Kindly excuse brevity and typos

On Mon, 11 Feb 2019, 18:47 Maureen Hilyard <maureen.hilyard at gmail.com wrote:

> Hi everyone
>
> Thanks to everyone especially Marita and Bastiaan who have led the
> Strategic Plan statement and the team that has been working on the FBSC
> document, it is work well done - as per usual when the teams come
> together.  The ATLAS teams have started some great work as well.
>
> Another more urgent task - If you have had a look at the Questions for
> ICANN64 meetings
> <https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Questions+for+ICANN64>,
> you will see that the GAC session is the only one that is fully organised.
>
> But by Feb 18, we also have to come up with some brilliantly innovative
> ways for the Board, ICANN Org and the community to implement their
> strategic plan and all their other goals for the next few years , as well
> as provide some advice on how the Board could work more collaboratively and
> productively with their partners to achieve ICANN goals.
>
> We should be able to do this because ADVICE is what we do. Therefore, I
> would appreciate some suggestions to be provided on the page that we can
> discuss in Kobe or before, or they are going to be short meetings.
> Everyone should have access to the page.
>
> Bullet points would be good that we can expand on in our session in Kobe
> on Sunday, over lunch.
>
> M
> _______________________________________________
> ALAC-Members mailing list
> ALAC-Members at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac-members
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/private/alt-plus/attachments/20190213/87a7bef9/attachment.html>