[ALT-Plus] [ALAC-Members] CCEGIG

[Seun Ojedeji]

Hello Maureen,

Can you share reference to the CCEGIG charter?

Thanks

Sent from my mobile
Kindly excuse brevity and typos

On Mon, 7 Jan 2019, 22:57 Maureen Hilyard <maureen.hilyard at gmail.com wrote:

> Dear ALAC and ALT+ members
>
> You may remember, way back in 2018, Olivier raised the issue of the ccNSO
> and GNSO pulling out of the CCWG IG so that we were the remaining charter
> group of what was to be renamed the Cross Community Engagement Group on
> Internet Governance. (CCEGIG).
>
> Olivier is still awaiting what our decision is, in relation to the options
> that he gave (but with no priority or recommendation)..
>
> 1. The ALAC proposes to all SOs and ACs except the ccNSO, that they join a
> CCEG IG according to the proposed CCEG Charter
> 2. The ALAC proposes to the GNSO Constituencies in both houses as well as
> any other SOs and ACs, except the ccNSO, that they join a CCEG IG according
> to the proposed CCEG Charter
> 3. The ALAC proposes to the GNSO Constituencies in both houses, that they
> join a CCEG IG according to the proposed CCEG Charter, bearing in mind the
> original creation of the CCWG was between the ALAC and the NCSG.
> 4. The ALAC creates a working group on Internet Governance which is open
> to all, thus being able to accept members of other SOs/ACs/Cs, including
> GAC and SSAC members
> 5. The ALAC asks the Board to create a working group on Internet
> Governance and asks to be part of that working group
> 6. The ALAC does nothing and thus the topic of community-led ICANN-wide
> Internet Governance  discussion ends.
>
> I have mentioned to Olivier that At-Large already has a very strong
> alliance with things IG, and it would not be out of line for us to
> establish an IG Engagement Group to discuss IG issues as they relate to
> ICANN.  Then it would be easy for other constituencies to easily slip into
> the group because its charter (developed by us would encourage this)>
>
> For me personally I would select #4. But I am happy to hear others' views
> on any of the other options that they see as more practical for us to
> support.
>
> I know that Olivier has already been waiting over a year now for a
> response from us, but I'd like an answer to be returned to him as soon as
> possible. By 11 Jan?
>
> Regards
> Maureen
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ALAC-Members mailing list
> ALAC-Members at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac-members
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/private/alt-plus/attachments/20190107/081f0711/attachment-0001.html>